IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1920-d744378.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Analysis for Life Cycle Assessment of Bio-Cementitious Materials Production and Sustainable Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Adel Ali Al-Gheethi

    (Eco Hydrology Technology Research Centre (Eco-Hytech), Faculty of Civil Engineering & Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat 86400, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Zubair Ahmed Memon

    (Department of Engineering Management, College of Engineering, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh 11586, Saudi Arabia)

  • Ali Tighnavard Balasbaneh

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat 86400, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Walid A. Al-Kutti

    (Department of Civil & Construction Engineering, College of Engineering, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam 34212, Saudi Arabia)

  • Norfaniza Mokhtar

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat 86400, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Norzila Othman

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat 86400, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Mohd Irwan Juki

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat 86400, Johor, Malaysia)

  • Efaq Ali Noman

    (Department of Applied Microbiology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Taiz University, Taiz 6803, Yemen)

  • Hassan Amer Algaifi

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Batu Pahat 86400, Johor, Malaysia)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to study the life cycle assessment of biocementitious materials production in comparison to traditional cement materials production. The environmental impact of production processes over the life cycle was evaluated on the basis of global warming and ozone depletion, human health, land, freshwater, marine ecotoxicity, and natural water system eutrophication. LCA uses endpoint methods (ECO indicators) and SimaPro 8 software to assess the health and environmental impact of raw materials used in the production process, including cement, Ca(NO 3 ) 2 ·4H 2 O, urea, molasses, and electricity. The results showed that cement materials made 82.88% of the world’s warming in all raw materials used in production processes, 87.24% of the world’s health, 89.54% of the deforestation of freshwater, and 30.48% to marine eutrophication. Ca(NO 3 ) 2 ·4H 2 O contributes by 58.88% to ozone depletion, 15.37 to human carcinogenic toxicity, 3.19% to freshwater eutrophication, and 11.76% to marine eutrophication. In contrast, urea contributes 38.15% to marine eutrophication and 5.25% to freshwater eutrophication. Molasses contribute by 13.77% to marine eutrophication. Cement contributes 74.27% to human health damage, 79.36% to ecosystem damage; Ca(NO 3 ) 2 ·4H 2 O contributes 13.54% to human health damage and 9.99% to ecosystem damage; while urea contributes 6.5% to human health damage and 5.91% to ecosystem damage. Bio-cementitious wastewater should undergo a treatment process to remove urea and molasses residues, as well as nitrates, before final disposal into the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Adel Ali Al-Gheethi & Zubair Ahmed Memon & Ali Tighnavard Balasbaneh & Walid A. Al-Kutti & Norfaniza Mokhtar & Norzila Othman & Mohd Irwan Juki & Efaq Ali Noman & Hassan Amer Algaifi, 2022. "Critical Analysis for Life Cycle Assessment of Bio-Cementitious Materials Production and Sustainable Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1920-:d:744378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1920/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1920/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moreno-Garcia, L. & Adjallé, K. & Barnabé, S. & Raghavan, G.S.V., 2017. "Microalgae biomass production for a biorefinery system: Recent advances and the way towards sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 493-506.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goh, Brandon Han Hoe & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Cheah, Mei Yee & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Yu, Kai Ling & Mahlia, Teuku Meurah Indra, 2019. "Sustainability of direct biodiesel synthesis from microalgae biomass: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 59-74.
    2. Lim, Juin Yau & Teng, Sin Yong & How, Bing Shen & Nam, KiJeon & Heo, SungKu & Máša, Vítězslav & Stehlík, Petr & Yoo, Chang Kyoo, 2022. "From microalgae to bioenergy: Identifying optimally integrated biorefinery pathways and harvest scheduling under uncertainties in predicted climate," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    3. Chang, Wenjuan & Li, Yanpeng & Qu, Yanhui & Liu, Yi & Zhang, Gaoshan & Zhao, Yan & Liu, Siyu, 2022. "Mixotrophic cultivation of microalgae to enhance the biomass and lipid production with synergistic effect of red light and phytohormone IAA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 819-828.
    4. Patel, Anil Kumar & Singhania, Reeta Rani & Dong, Cheng-Di & Obulisami, Parthiba Karthikeyan & Sim, Sang Jun, 2021. "Mixotrophic biorefinery: A promising algal platform for sustainable biofuels and high value coproducts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Zabed, Hossain M. & Akter, Suely & Yun, Junhua & Zhang, Guoyan & Zhang, Yufei & Qi, Xianghui, 2020. "Biogas from microalgae: Technologies, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Abreu, Ana P. & Morais, Rui C. & Teixeira, José A. & Nunes, João, 2022. "A comparison between microalgal autotrophic growth and metabolite accumulation with heterotrophic, mixotrophic and photoheterotrophic cultivation modes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    7. Senem Onen Cinar & Zhi Kai Chong & Mehmet Ali Kucuker & Nils Wieczorek & Ugur Cengiz & Kerstin Kuchta, 2020. "Bioplastic Production from Microalgae: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Hamnas, Amina & Unnikrishnan, G., 2023. "Bio-lubricants from vegetable oils: Characterization, modifications, applications and challenges – Review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    9. Ferreira, G.F. & Ríos Pinto, L.F. & Maciel Filho, R. & Fregolente, L.V., 2019. "A review on lipid production from microalgae: Association between cultivation using waste streams and fatty acid profiles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 448-466.
    10. Makoto M. Watanabe & Andreas Isdepsky, 2021. "Biocrude Oil Production by Integrating Microalgae Polyculture and Wastewater Treatment: Novel Proposal on the Use of Deep Water-Depth Polyculture of Mixotrophic Microalgae," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-29, October.
    11. Ali, Hamdy Elsayed Ahmed & El-fayoumy, Eman A. & Soliman, Ramadan M. & Elkhatat, Ahmed & Al-Meer, Saeed & Elsaid, Khaled & Hussein, Hanaa Ali & Zul Helmi Rozaini, Mohd & Azmuddin Abdullah, Mohd, 2024. "Nanoparticle applications in Algal-biorefinery for biofuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    12. Agnieszka Szmagara, 2024. "Blue in Food and Beverages—A Review of Socio-Cultural, Economic, and Environmental Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-44, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1920-:d:744378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.