IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1906-d744073.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Landslide Induced Displacement and Relocation Options: A Case Study of Owner Driven Settings in Sri Lanka

Author

Listed:
  • Anuradha Senanayake

    (Department of Sociology, University of Colombo, Colombo 999011, Sri Lanka)

  • Nishara Fernando

    (Department of Sociology, University of Colombo, Colombo 999011, Sri Lanka)

  • Maduri Wasana

    (Social Policy Analysis and Research Centre, Colombo 999011, Sri Lanka)

  • Dilanthi Amaratunga

    (Global Disaster Resilience Centre, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK)

  • Richard Haigh

    (Global Disaster Resilience Centre, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK)

  • Chamindi Malalgoda

    (Global Disaster Resilience Centre, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK)

  • Chathuranganee Jayakody

    (Global Disaster Resilience Centre, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, UK)

Abstract

Disaster induced displacement is one of the most frequent phenomena occurring in the contemporary world and has been aggravated by factors such as climate change. With the systematic interpretation of disaster risks, planned relocation has been recognized as a durable solution for post-disaster reconstruction and disaster mitigation. Planned relocation initiatives that have been executed as post-disaster reconstruction initiatives in Sri Lanka have mainly followed donor driven and owner driven approaches. This study is a comparative analysis of the status quo of owner driven relocation options that were implemented after the landslide which took place in 2016 in the X District of Sri Lanka. Two research fields were selected based on the two owner driven options as part of the selected case study: Government Resettlement Sites and Individual Resettlement Sites. This exploratory study utilizes both secondary and primary data. A purposive sample of ten households was selected from each setting to conduct in-depth interviews. Furthermore, five structured interviews with key informants were conducted using an expert sample. Secondary data were collected based on the concepts of relocation and satisfaction of housing. The findings suggest that the respondents were satisfied with the housing units in both settings despite concerns in relation to the suggested plans of the housing units. Furthermore, common concerns were raised in terms of delays and issues in fund management in construction of houses. However, there was a drastic disparity in terms of other infrastructural, public, and neighborhood facilities in the two settings. Hence, this study suggests the need for an overall management and monitoring strategy for all owner driven relocation options.

Suggested Citation

  • Anuradha Senanayake & Nishara Fernando & Maduri Wasana & Dilanthi Amaratunga & Richard Haigh & Chamindi Malalgoda & Chathuranganee Jayakody, 2022. "Landslide Induced Displacement and Relocation Options: A Case Study of Owner Driven Settings in Sri Lanka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1906-:d:744073
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1906/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1906/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jae-Hyeon Park & Seong-Gyun Park & Hyun Kim, 2022. "Applicability Evaluation of Landslide Vulnerability Criteria for Decision on Landcreep-Vulnerable Areas in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. S. M. Amin Hosseini & Rama Ghalambordezfooly & Albert de la Fuente, 2022. "Sustainability Model to Select Optimal Site Location for Temporary Housing Units: Combining GIS and the MIVES–Knapsack Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1906-:d:744073. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.