IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1755-d741528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Internal Control on Green Innovation: Corporate Environmental Investment as a Mediator

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang Ma

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48547, Korea
    School of Mathematics and Information Science, Nanchang Normal University, Nanchang 330032, China)

  • Young-Seok Ock

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48547, Korea)

  • Fengpei Wu

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48547, Korea)

  • Zhenyang Zhang

    (Graduate School of Management of Technology, Pukyong National University, Busan 48547, Korea)

Abstract

The increasing focus on environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) has led to a growing interest in how firms’ internal behaviors affect their contributions in promoting sustainable economic development and fulfilling social responsibility. While previous studies have often explored the impact of internal controls on corporate investment decisions, little attention has been paid to the impact of internal controls on corporate green innovation. To this end, we explored the relationship between internal control, environmental investment, and green innovation using data from 2014–2019 for A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China. The regression results show that there is a significant positive relationship between internal control and corporate green innovation. The improvement of internal control has a significant positive impact on firms’ active adoption of environmental protection investment. Environmental investment plays a partially mediating role in the process of internal control’s influence on green innovation. This implies that the effect of internal control on green innovation further affects green innovation through the indirect effect of environmental investment, in addition to the direct effect. Moreover, through further research, we find that the above influence relationship is significantly present in both heavily polluting and non-heavily polluting enterprises, as well as in state-owned and private enterprises, but is more significant in heavily polluting firms and private firms. Finally, this study responds to the debate on whether internal controls inhibit or promote enterprise innovation. We advocate further research on this issue in the future in terms of the differences in the accountability systems and customs of firms’ decision-making in different countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang Ma & Young-Seok Ock & Fengpei Wu & Zhenyang Zhang, 2022. "The Effect of Internal Control on Green Innovation: Corporate Environmental Investment as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1755-:d:741528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1755/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1755/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chenxi Zhang & Shanyue Jin, 2022. "How Does an Environmental Information Disclosure of a Buyer’s Enterprise Affect Green Technological Innovations of Sellers’ Enterprise?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-25, November.
    2. Zhiliang Xu & Changxin Xu & Yun Li, 2023. "Green Credit Policy, Environmental Investment, and Green Innovation: Quasi-Natural Experimental Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Dan Yu & Kewei Hu & Yugui Hao, 2023. "The Effect of Local Government Environmental Concern on Corporate Environmental Investment: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Jinying Liu & Yiping Wu & Haiwei Xu, 2022. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: The relationship between internal control and sustainable development of enterprises by mediating roles of exploratory innovation and exploitative innovation," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 913-924, December.
    5. Han Long & Gen-Fu Feng & Chun-Ping Chang, 2023. "How does ESG performance promote corporate green innovation?," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2889-2913, August.
    6. Naila Nureen & Da Liu & Muhammad Irfan & Maida Malik & Usama Awan, 2023. "Nexuses among Green Supply Chain Management, Green Human Capital, Managerial Environmental Knowledge, and Firm Performance: Evidence from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Lu, Juan & Li, He, 2024. "Can digital technology innovation promote total factor energy efficiency? Firm-level evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    8. Debora Kobayashi Mendes de Oliveira & Joshua Onome Imoniana & Valmor Slomski & Luciane Reginato & Vilma Geni Slomski, 2022. "How do Internal Control Environments Connect to Sustainable Development to Curb Fraud in Brazil?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Shanshan Gao & Wenqi Li & Jiayi Meng & Jianfeng Shi & Jianhua Zhu, 2023. "A Study on the Impact Mechanism of Digitalization on Corporate Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Jianfei Zhao & Anan Pongtornkulpanich & Wenjin Cheng, 2022. "The Impact of Board Size on Green Innovation in China’s Heavily Polluting Enterprises: The Mediating Role of Innovation Openness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Yongxiang Jiao & Fen Xu & Wenjing Ma & Hongen Yang, 2023. "Can Urban Greening Construction Improve the Corporate Preventive Environmental Investment? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Shiyong Zheng & Xinsen Ye & Weili Guan & Yuping Yang & Jiaying Li & Biqing Li, 2022. "Assessing the Influence of Green Innovation on the Market Performance of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1755-:d:741528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.