IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1656-d739402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementation Evaluation and Sustainable Development of China’s Religious Charity Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaojie Shi

    (Department of Social Work, School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)

  • Zhenxiao Fan

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60629 Frankfurt, Germany)

  • Jianguo Gao

    (Department of Social Work, School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China
    The Center for Judaic and Inter-Religious Studies, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)

Abstract

This paper discusses the comprehensiveness of religious policy content, the feasibility of implementation, and factors that affect the impact of policy implementation. Since the reform and opening up in 1978, China’s religious charities have been in a period of organizational reconstruction, and the government exercises legal administration over religious affairs, forming a dual administrative management model: the central and local government and the civil affairs department and religious department, forming the preliminary implementation framework of religious policy. Currently, government policy implementation regarding religious charity activities adopts a "policy-centered, top-down" approach in an attempt to create a clear path toward policy implementation. Using the Smith policy implementation process model, combined with field research in three cities in the Shandong province, this study finds multiple limitations deterring religious charity policy execution, including: (a) government policy texts that are not comprehensive; (b) unclear responsibilities of government departments; and (c) sensitive political and social environments. There is still a long way to ensure the smooth implementation of religious charity policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaojie Shi & Zhenxiao Fan & Jianguo Gao, 2022. "Implementation Evaluation and Sustainable Development of China’s Religious Charity Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1656-:d:739402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1656/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1656/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yanzhi Liu & Rong Cao & Zheng Wang, 2023. "Does Help-Seeking Message Content Impact Online Charitable Behavior? A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on 40 Waterdrop Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1656-:d:739402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.