IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1540-d736925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To See, or Not to See, That Is the Question: Studying Dutch Experimentalist Energy Transition Governance through an Evolutionary Lens

Author

Listed:
  • Martijn Gerritsen

    (Center for Urban and Regional Research, Department of Geography, Planning & Environment, Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

  • Henk-Jan Kooij

    (Center for Urban and Regional Research, Department of Geography, Planning & Environment, Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

  • Martijn Groenleer

    (Tilburg Center for Regional Law and Governance, Department of Public Law and Governance, Tilburg Law School, Tilburg University, 5037 AB Tilburg, The Netherlands)

  • Erwin van der Krabben

    (Center for Urban and Regional Research, Department of Geography, Planning & Environment, Nijmegen School of Management, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Experimentalist forms of governance have burgeoned across policy areas and institutional contexts in recent years. Recognizing that experimentalist forms of governance can evolve along a plethora of distinct pathways, this paper inquires how the evolutionary nature of experimentalism can be explored in greater depth. Linking the framework of experimentalist governance to that of Evolutionary Governance Theory (EGT), the paper identifies three driving mechanisms of contingency in experimentalism: governance being (1) self-referential, (2) rooted in observation, and (3) steered by dependencies. The paper then refers to recent efforts in the realm of energy transition governance in the Netherlands to illustrate how these contingency mechanisms can help to interrogate the variegated evolutionary pathways that experimentalist governance may have in practice. Building on this Dutch empirical context, the paper puts forward evolutionary path- and context-mapping as a fruitful tool for identifying and disentangling the myriad of pathways along which experimentalism may manifest itself.

Suggested Citation

  • Martijn Gerritsen & Henk-Jan Kooij & Martijn Groenleer & Erwin van der Krabben, 2022. "To See, or Not to See, That Is the Question: Studying Dutch Experimentalist Energy Transition Governance through an Evolutionary Lens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1540-:d:736925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1540/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1540/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kristof van Assche & Raoul Beunen & Martijn Duineveld, 2014. "Evolutionary Governance Theory," SpringerBriefs in Economics, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-319-00984-1, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristof Van Assche & Monica Gruezmacher & Raoul Beunen, 2022. "Why Governance Is Never Perfect: Co-Evolution in Environmental Policy and Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-7, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hiska Ubels & Bettina Bock & Tialda Haartsen, 2019. "An evolutionary perspective on experimental local governance arrangements with local governments and residents in Dutch rural areas of depopulation," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(7), pages 1277-1295, November.
    2. Jauernig, Johanna & Uhl, Matthias & Valentinov, Vladislav, 2021. "The ethics of corporate hypocrisy: An experimental approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 131.
    3. Kristof Van Assche & Raoul Beunen & Stefan Verweij, 2020. "Learning from Other Places and Their Plans: Comparative Learning in and for Planning Systems," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 1-5.
    4. Rodrigo Alves Rolo & Kristof Van Assche & Martijn Duineveld, 2021. "Strategy and Steering in Governance: The Changing Fates of the Argentine Planning Council," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 415-427.
    5. Kylie Ching Mun Wang & Khai Ern Lee & Mazlin Mokhtar, 2021. "Solid Waste Management in Small Tourism Islands: An Evolutionary Governance Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Gaby Umbach & Igor Tkalec, 2021. "Social Investment Policies in the EU: Actively Concrete or Passively Abstract?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 403-414.
    7. Van Assche, Kristof & Gruezmacher, Monica & Summers, Bob & Culling, Joshua & Gajjar, Shaival & Granzow, Michael & Lowerre, Andrew & Deacon, Leith & Candlish, Jared & Jamwal, Abhimanyu, 2022. "Land use policy and community strategy. Factors enabling and hampering integrated local strategy in Alberta, Canada," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    8. Pérez-Sindín, Xaquín S. & Van Assche, Kristof, 2021. "“Coal [from Colombia] is our life”. Bourdieu, the miners (after they are miners) and resistance in As Pontes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Wilde, Kerstin & Hermans, Frans, 2021. "Deconstructing the attractiveness of biocluster imaginaries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(2), pages 227-242.
    10. Lochner Marais & Verna Nel & Kholisa Rani & Deidré van Rooyen & Kentse Sesele & Phia van der Watt & Lyndon du Plessis, 2021. "Economic Transitions in South Africa’s Secondary Cities: Governing Mine Closures," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 381-392.
    11. Utkur Djanibekov & Grace B. Villamor & Klara Dzhakypbekova & James Chamberlain & Jianchu Xu, 2016. "Adoption of Sustainable Land Uses in Post-Soviet Central Asia: The Case for Agroforestry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Patrick Huntjens & René Kemp, 2022. "The Importance of a Natural Social Contract and Co-Evolutionary Governance for Sustainability Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, March.
    13. Marc Mölders, 2021. "Irritation Design: Updating Steering Theory in the Age of Governance," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 393-402.
    14. de Vries, Jasper R. & Aarts, Noelle & Lokhorst, Anne Marike & Beunen, Raoul & Munnink, Josefien Oude, 2015. "Trust related dynamics in contested land use," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 302-310.
    15. Xenia I. Loizidou & Demetra L. Orthodoxou & Michael I. Loizides & Yannis N. Krestenitis, 2021. "A community-based approach for site-specific policies and solutions on marine litter: the example of Paphos, Cyprus," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 33-44, March.
    16. Matebesi, Sethulego & Marais, Lochner, 2018. "Social licensing and mining in South Africa: Reflections from community protests at a mining site," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 371-378.
    17. Nate Kauffman & Kristina Hill, 2021. "Climate Change, Adaptation Planning and Institutional Integration: A Literature Review and Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-28, September.
    18. Russell C. Weaver & Jason Knight, 2014. "Evolutionary Mismatch as a General Framework for Land Use Policy and Politics," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Gailing, Ludger & Röhring, Andreas, 2016. "Is it all about collaborative governance? Alternative ways of understanding the success of energy regions," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 237-245.
    20. Raoul Beunen & Kristof Van Assche, 2021. "Steering in Governance: Evolutionary Perspectives," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 365-368.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1540-:d:736925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.