IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1420-d734780.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Female Role Models Leading a Group Mentoring Program to Promote STEM Vocations among Young Girls

Author

Listed:
  • Mariluz Guenaga

    (Engineering Faculty, University of Deusto, 48007 Bilbao, Spain)

  • Andoni Eguíluz

    (Engineering Faculty, University of Deusto, 48007 Bilbao, Spain)

  • Pablo Garaizar

    (Engineering Faculty, University of Deusto, 48007 Bilbao, Spain)

  • Ander Mimenza

    (EDE Foundation, 48010 Bilbo, Spain)

Abstract

From an early age, girls disregard studies related to science, technology, engineering, or mathematics (STEM), and this means that a gender gap begins during secondary education and continues to increase over time. Multiple causes have been identified for this phenomenon in the literature, and numerous initiatives are being carried out to reverse this situation. In this paper, we analyze the impact that a group mentoring initiative led by a female STEM role model had on the young people who participated and whether the impact was different based on their sex. We analyzed how these mentoring sessions affected their attitudes towards technology, mathematical self-efficacy, gender stereotypes, science and technology references, and career vocations. To this end, 303 students between the ages of 10 and 12 years old from 10 schools in Spain participated in the six sessions comprising the program and completed a series of questionnaires before and after participating. The results show that the program had an impact on the students’ attitudes towards technology, increased the number of female STEM references they knew, and improved their opinions of vocations and professions related to science and technology. The impact was greater among girls, although in aspects such as attitudes towards technology, the female participants still demonstrated lower values than boys. The program did not improve the stereotypes that the young participants had about mathematical self-efficacy, which was also always lower among girls. We conclude that the lack of STEM vocations among girls is rooted in multiple social, educational, and personal aspects that need to be addressed from a very early age and that should involve multiple agents.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariluz Guenaga & Andoni Eguíluz & Pablo Garaizar & Ander Mimenza, 2022. "The Impact of Female Role Models Leading a Group Mentoring Program to Promote STEM Vocations among Young Girls," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1420-:d:734780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1420/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1420/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. María-Paz Zorzano, 2020. "Gender Balance in Mars Exploration: Lessons Learned from the Mars Science Laboratory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olusiji Adebola Lasekan & Margot Teresa Godoy Pena & Adeyinka John Odebode & Alfredo Pedro Mabica & Raul Abílio Mabasso & Oluwatosin Mogbadunade, 2024. "Fostering Sustainable Female Participation in STEM Through Ecological Systems Theory: A Comparative Study in Three African Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Addissie Melak & Seema Singh, 2021. "Women’s Participation and Factors Affecting Their Academic Performance in Engineering and Technology Education: A Study of Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1420-:d:734780. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.