IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1352-d733350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiscapes and Urbanisation: The Case for Spatial Agroecology

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Morris

    (Department of Agricultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7674, New Zealand
    Centre of Excellence Designing Future Productive Landscapes, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7674, New Zealand)

  • Shannon Davis

    (Centre of Excellence Designing Future Productive Landscapes, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7674, New Zealand
    School of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Environment, Society and Design, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7674, New Zealand)

  • Gwen-Aëlle Grelet

    (Manaaki Whenua—Landcare Research, 54 Gerald Street, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand)

  • Pablo Gregorini

    (Department of Agricultural Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7674, New Zealand
    Centre of Excellence Designing Future Productive Landscapes, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7674, New Zealand)

Abstract

The two most significant signatures of the Anthropocene—agriculture and urbanisation—have yet to be studied synoptically. The term periurban is used to describe territory where the urbanising trend of the planet extends into multiscapes. A periurban praxis is required that spatially reconciles urbanisation and agriculture, simultaneously permitting urban growth and the enhancement of critical ecosystem services provided by agricultural hinterlands. This paper presents a synthesis of four fields of ecological research that converge on periurban multiscapes—ecological urbanism, landscape ecology, ecosystem services science and agroecology. By applying an ecosystem services approach, a diagram is developed that connects these fields as a holistic praxis for spatially optimising periurban multiscapes for ecosystem services performance. Two spatial qualities of agroecology—‘ES Density’ and ‘ES Plasticity’—potentiate recent areas of research in each of the other three fields—ecology for the city from ecological urbanism, landscape metrics from landscape ecology (particularly the potential application of fractals and surface metrics) and ecosystem services supply and demand mapping and ‘ES Space’ theory from ecosystems services science. While the multifunctional value of agroecological systems is becoming widely accepted, this paper focuses on agroecology’s specific spatial value and its unique capacity to supply ecosystem services specifically tailored to the critical ecosystemic demands of periurban multiscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Morris & Shannon Davis & Gwen-Aëlle Grelet & Pablo Gregorini, 2022. "Multiscapes and Urbanisation: The Case for Spatial Agroecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1352-:d:733350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1352/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1352/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongwei Guo & Ji Han & Lili Qian & Xinxin Long & Xiaoyin Sun, 2022. "Assessing the Potential Impacts of Urban Expansion on Hydrological Ecosystem Services in a Rapidly Urbanizing Lake Basin in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1352-:d:733350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.