IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i3p1338-d733173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of Design and Construction of Transit Facilities in Rural Areas in USA

Author

Listed:
  • Sharareh Kermanshachi

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA)

  • Elnaz Safapour

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA)

  • Apurva Pamidimukkala

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA)

Abstract

The United States rural transit facilities have a considerable impact on annual transportation expenditures as there are many of them and they are geographically dispersed. It is challenging to estimate the design and construction costs of the facilities, as the historical and documented cost database is insufficient; therefore, the ultimate aim of this study was to establish a baseline estimate for design and construction costs. Additionally, the key information associated with the different aspects of rural transit facility projects was also provided in this study. Interviews were conducted with professional managers of different departments of transportation (DOTs) who were involved in rural transit projects. A structured survey was then developed and distributed to various DOT representatives, and 26 of them were completed and returned. Two regression models were generated by utilizing the survey data to predict the design and construction costs of rural transit facilities, based on the size of the projects. Furthermore, the results revealed that issues arising from soil conditions and unexpected underground conditions are frequently risk factors for construction of transit facilities. It was also concluded that the popular approach to estimating the cost of the design and construction phases associated with transit facility projects is to use the data from similar projects. These findings support the need for additional literature to provide a baseline estimate for design and construction costs and key information of different important aspects of rural transit facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharareh Kermanshachi & Elnaz Safapour & Apurva Pamidimukkala, 2022. "Study of Design and Construction of Transit Facilities in Rural Areas in USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1338-:d:733173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1338/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/3/1338/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Chialin & Achtari, Guyves & Majkut, Kevin & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2017. "Balancing equity and cost in rural transportation management with multi-objective utility analysis and data envelopment analysis: A case of Quinte West," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 148-165.
    2. Queiroz, Cesar & Gautam, Surhid, 1992. "Road infrastructure and economic development : some diagnostic indicators," Policy Research Working Paper Series 921, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leopoldo Laborda & Daniel Sotelsek, 2019. "Effects of Road Infrastructure on Employment, Productivity and Growth: An Empirical Analysis at Country Level," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 11(1-2), pages 81-120, June.
    2. Yining Lu & Tao Wang & Zhuangzhuang Wang & Chaoyang Li & Yi Zhang, 2022. "Modeling the Dynamic Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Based on Transportation Equity and Cost Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Chen, Jingxu & Wang, Shuaian & Liu, Zhiyuan & Guo, Yanyong, 2018. "Network-based optimization modeling of manhole setting for pipeline transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 38-55.
    4. Jimenez, Emmanuel & DEC, 1994. "Human and physical infrastructure : public investment and pricing policies in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1281, The World Bank.
    5. Mahmoudi, Reza & Emrouznejad, Ali & Shetab-Boushehri, Seyyed-Nader & Hejazi, Seyed Reza, 2020. "The origins, development and future directions of data envelopment analysis approach in transportation systems," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Xie, Cong & Xie, Lunyu & Xu, Jintao & Yi, Yuanyuan, 2022. "The Impact of the Three-North Shelter Forest Program on Rural Income: Evidence from Inner Mongolia in China," EfD Discussion Paper 22-2, Environment for Development, University of Gothenburg.
    7. Masárová Jana & Ivanová Eva, 2016. "Road infrastructure in the regions of the Slovak Republic and Poland," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 33(33), pages 79-90, September.
    8. Gros, Daniel & Suhrcke, Marc, 2000. "Ten years after: What is special about transition countries?," HWWA Discussion Papers 86, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).
    9. Xuemei Zhou & Jiahui Liang & Xiangfeng Ji & Caitlin D. Cottrill, 2019. "The Influence of Information Services on Public Transport Behavior of Urban and Rural Residents," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, October.
    10. Escobal, Javier, 2005. "The Role of Public Infraestructure in Market Development in Rural Peru," MPRA Paper 727, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Liu, Zhi & Zheng, Xiao-Xue & Li, Deng-Feng & Liao, Chen-Nan & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2021. "A novel cooperative game-based method to coordinate a sustainable supply chain under psychological uncertainty in fairness concerns," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    12. Sinem Kilic Celik & M. Ayhan Kose & Franziska Ohnsorge, 2023. "Potential Growth Prospects: Risks, Rewards and Policies," CAMA Working Papers 2023-19, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    13. Ng, Choy Peng & Law, Teik Hua & Wong, Shaw Voon & Kulanthayan, S., 2017. "Relative improvements in road mobility as compared to improvements in road accessibility and economic growth: A cross-country analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 24-33.
    14. Yuan, Dandan & Zhao, Pengjun & Yu, Zhao & Liu, Qiyang, 2023. "Villagers' travel burden and the built environment in rural China: Evidence from a national level survey," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    15. Marie-Ange VEGANZONES-VAROUDAKIS, 2000. "Infrastructures, investissement et croissance : un bilan de dix années de recherches," Working Papers 200007, CERDI.
    16. Yalcin, Ahmet Selcuk & Kilic, Huseyin Selcuk & Delen, Dursun, 2022. "The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in business analytics: A comprehensive literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    17. Anastasios Mouratidis & Fotini Kehagia, 2014. "On the Track of Road Evolution," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, June.
    18. Sedef Akgũngōr & Yesim Kustepeli & Yaprak Gūlcan, 2014. "The Impact of Road Network on External Trade," Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(4), pages 190-198, December.
    19. Zhao, Pengjun & Yu, Zhao, 2020. "Investigating mobility in rural areas of China: Features, equity, and factors," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 66-77.
    20. Mukul GUPTA & Rahul BUDHADEV & Varun CHOTIA & N V Muralidhar RAO, 2016. "Integrating the issue of infrastructural investment with economic growth: The case of India," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(3(608), A), pages 141-162, Autumn.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1338-:d:733173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.