Author
Listed:
- Mohammad Syuhaimi Ab-Rahman
(Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bandar Baru Bangi 43600, Malaysia)
- I-Shyan Hwang
(Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Yuan-Ze University, Chung-Li 32003, Taiwan)
- Abdul Rahman Mohd Yusoff
(Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bandar Baru Bangi 43600, Malaysia)
- Abdul Wahab Mohamad
(Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bandar Baru Bangi 43600, Malaysia)
- Ahmad Kamal Ariffin Mohd Ihsan
(Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bandar Baru Bangi 43600, Malaysia)
- Juwairiyyah Abdul Rahman
(Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Selangor (UNISEL), Batang Berjuntai 45600, Malaysia)
- Mohd Jailani Mohd Nor
(Fakulti Kejuruteraan Mekanikal, Universiti Teknikal Malaysia (UTeM), Durian Tunggal 76100, Malaysia)
- Iszan Hana Kaharudin
(Centre for Liberal Studies (CITRA), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bandar Baru Bangi 43600, Malaysia)
Abstract
Outstanding academic achievement in the field of higher education is a source of pride for the university. The success of the university is measured not only by academic performance but also by the quality of graduates produced. In Malaysia, three major categories in higher learning are identified: public, private, and foreign-branch universities. All engineering programs follow the requirements set by the Engineering Accreditation Council (EAC) on behalf of the Board of Engineers Malaysia (BEM). The programme educational objectives (PEOs) make up one of the elements that needs assessment for ensuring its continuity in line with the university’s mission and vision. A PEO comparative study on selected reputable electrical and electronic (EE)-engineering department universities was carried out based on the mapping of PEO attribute keywords. These attributes were then classified into either cluster, sharing, or uniqueness groups. The study compared the relevancy of each PEO statement suggested by stakeholders and other interested parties. The results from the PEO comparative study suggested that attributes on competency, ethics, professionalism, and leadership are given high priorities. However, the increase in demand for entrepreneurship-, multidisciplinary-, and soft skills should also be considered when reviewing the institution’s engineering curriculum. The uniqueness of such attributes will distinguish the EE-engineering graduates’ profession, marketability, and employability. PEO statements reflect the credibility and sustainability of a well-balanced graduate equipped with the right knowledge, skills, and values.
Suggested Citation
Mohammad Syuhaimi Ab-Rahman & I-Shyan Hwang & Abdul Rahman Mohd Yusoff & Abdul Wahab Mohamad & Ahmad Kamal Ariffin Mohd Ihsan & Juwairiyyah Abdul Rahman & Mohd Jailani Mohd Nor & Iszan Hana Kaharudin, 2022.
"A Global Program-Educational-Objectives Comparative Study for Malaysian Electrical and Electronic Engineering Graduates,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-29, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1280-:d:731878
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Aleah Maris U. Domingo & Jenny Lou B. Palao & Genelyn R. Baluyos & Mhie B. Daniel, 2025.
"Students’ Awareness, Practices, and Engagement in the Institution’s Philosophy, Vision, Mission, Goals, Objectives and Core Values,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 2379-2399, January.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:3:p:1280-:d:731878. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.