Author
Listed:
- William O. Taylor
(Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
Eversource Energy Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA)
- Peter L. Watson
(Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
Eversource Energy Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA)
- Diego Cerrai
(Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
Eversource Energy Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA)
- Emmanouil Anagnostou
(Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
Eversource Energy Center, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA)
Abstract
This paper develops a statistical framework to analyze the effectiveness of vegetation management at reducing power outages during storms of varying severity levels. The framework was applied on the Eversource Energy distribution grid in Connecticut, USA based on 173 rain and wind events from 2005–2020, including Hurricane Irene, Hurricane Sandy, and Tropical Storm Isaias. The data were binned by storm severity (high/low) and vegetation management levels, where a maximum applicable length of vegetation management for each circuit was determined, and the data were divided into four bins based on the actual length of vegetation management performed divided by the maximum applicable value (0–25%, 25–50%, 50–75%, and 75–100%). Then, weather and overhead line length normalized outage statistics were taken for each group. The statistics were used to determine the effectiveness of vegetation management and its dependence on storm severity. The results demonstrate a higher reduction in damages for lower-severity storms, with a reduction in normalized outages between 45.8% and 63.8%. For high-severity events, there is a large increase in effectiveness between the highest level of vegetation management and the two lower levels, with 75–100% vegetation management leading to a 37.3% reduction in trouble spots. Yet, when evaluating system reliability, it is important to look at all storms combined, and the results of this study provide useful information on total annual trouble spots and allow for analysis of how various vegetation management scenarios would impact trouble spots in the electric grid. This framework can also be used to better understand how more rigorous vegetation management standards (applying ETT) help reduce outages at an individual event level. In future work, a similar framework may be used to evaluate other resilience improvements.
Suggested Citation
William O. Taylor & Peter L. Watson & Diego Cerrai & Emmanouil Anagnostou, 2022.
"A Statistical Framework for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Vegetation Management in Reducing Power Outages Caused during Storms in Distribution Networks,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-18, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:904-:d:724242
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Hughes, William & Watson, Peter L. & Cerrai, Diego & Zhang, Xinxuan & Bagtzoglou, Amvrossios & Zhang, Wei & Anagnostou, Emmanouil, 2024.
"Assessing grid hardening strategies to improve power system performance during storms using a hybrid mechanistic-machine learning outage prediction model,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
- Hughes, William & Zhang, Wei & Cerrai, Diego & Bagtzoglou, Amvrossios & Wanik, David & Anagnostou, Emmanouil, 2022.
"A Hybrid Physics-Based and Data-Driven Model for Power Distribution System Infrastructure Hardening and Outage Simulation,"
Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:904-:d:724242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.