Author
Listed:
- Elanor Colleoni
(Department of Business, Law, Economics and Consumer Behavior, IULM University, 20100 Milan, Italy)
- Stefania Romenti
(Department of Business, Law, Economics and Consumer Behavior, IULM University, 20100 Milan, Italy)
- Chiara Valentini
(School of Business & Economics, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland)
- Mark Badham
(School of Business & Economics, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland)
- Sung In Choi
(Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)
- Sungsu Kim
(School of Communication, Kookmin University, Seoul 02707, Korea)
- Yan Jin
(Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has brought several challenges to businesses and societies. In response, many corporations have supported local communities and authorities in the management of the pandemic. Although these initiatives, which can be considered forms of corporate social responsibility (CSR), were highly coupled with explicit CSR communication campaigns, little is known about whether these campaigns were effective. Previous research indicates that culture can shape people’s perceptions of CSR initiatives and communications, suggesting that businesses pay attention to careful consideration of cultural norms for effective CSR communication. However, the COVID-19 pandemic as a new CSR setting may challenge earlier findings. This study empirically investigates whether three cultural factors (individualism/collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, and power distance) affect public perceptions measured as recall of and favorability towards corporate COVID-19 response initiatives across six countries. Findings from a representative survey of adults across these countries show that respondents in individualistic and collectivistic countries recall these CSR communication campaigns about these corporate COVID-19 response initiatives quite differently, and these are related to differences in power distance and uncertainty avoidance. However, no difference was found in overall corporate favorability, indicating that cultural factors did not affect levels of favorability towards such initiatives. This, we argue, can be explained by the global dimension of the COVID-19 pandemic, which is the context of these CSR initiatives. This study contributes to CSR communication literature with empirical findings from a global pandemic setting. It offers businesses and managers empirical grounds to understand the communicative impact of COVID-19 response initiatives, which can inform future CSR actions.
Suggested Citation
Elanor Colleoni & Stefania Romenti & Chiara Valentini & Mark Badham & Sung In Choi & Sungsu Kim & Yan Jin, 2022.
"Does Culture Matter? Measuring Cross-Country Perceptions of CSR Communication Campaigns about COVID-19,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:889-:d:723967
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:889-:d:723967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.