IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p871-d723528.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Circular Economy in Construction and Demolition Waste Management in the Western Balkans: A Sustainability Assessment Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Nadazdi

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Zorana Naunovic

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Nenad Ivanisevic

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

Population growth, consumerism and linear (take-make-dispose) economy models have been piling up waste for decades. The construction industry is also based primarily on linear economy models, but the good news is that most of the waste can be re-used or recycled. So far, numerous models for managing construction and demolition waste in a sustainable way have been developed, but only a few models have included circular economy approaches. The main objective of this study is to propose an integrated framework for the sustainability assessment of CDW management. Apart from the economic, environmental and social aspects of sustainability, this model also includes circular economy principles. The proposed framework is based on the integration of existing methods: bottom-up materials stock approximation; cost–benefit analysis for criteria calculation; and scenario and multi-criteria decision-making analysis for sustainability. It is suggested that the European average recovery rates should be used for future scenario development. With higher re-use and recycling rates, the potential for the circularity of the recovered waste grows. In an effort to increase circularity in the region, particular attention was devoted to customize the framework and examine its potential for use in the Western Balkan countries. The framework may also be useful in countries with immature construction and demolition waste management.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Nadazdi & Zorana Naunovic & Nenad Ivanisevic, 2022. "Circular Economy in Construction and Demolition Waste Management in the Western Balkans: A Sustainability Assessment Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:871-:d:723528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/871/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/871/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Florin-Constantin Mihai, 2019. "Construction and Demolition Waste in Romania: The Route from Illegal Dumping to Building Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nuri Cihan Kayaçetin & Chiara Piccardo & Alexis Versele, 2022. "Social Impact Assessment of Circular Construction: Case of Living Lab Ghent," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Georgios F. Banias & Christos Karkanias & Maria Batsioula & Lefteris D. Melas & Apostolos E. Malamakis & Dimitris Geroliolios & Stamatia Skoutida & Xenofon Spiliotis, 2022. "Environmental Assessment of Alternative Strategies for the Management of Construction and Demolition Waste: A Life Cycle Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Cyrine Mrad & Luís Frölén Ribeiro, 2022. "A Review of Europe’s Circular Economy in the Building Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florin-Constantin Mihai & Ionut Minea, 2021. "Sustainable Alternative Routes versus Linear Economy and Resources Degradation in Eastern Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Liang Qiao & Doudou Liu & Xueliang Yuan & Qingsong Wang & Qiao Ma, 2020. "Generation and Prediction of Construction and Demolition Waste Using Exponential Smoothing Method: A Case Study of Shandong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-12, June.
    3. Florin-Constantin Mihai & Adrian Grozavu, 2019. "Role of Waste Collection Efficiency in Providing a Cleaner Rural Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Zhikun Ding & Mengjie Shi & Chen Lu & Zezhou Wu & Dan Chong & Wenyan Gong, 2019. "Predicting Renovation Waste Generation Based on Grey System Theory: A Case Study of Shenzhen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-13, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:871-:d:723528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.