Author
Listed:
- Rachel Pasternack
(The Nature Conservancy, 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100, Arlington, VA 22203, USA)
- Mark Wishnie
(BTG Pactual Timberland Investment Group, 1180 Peachtree Street NE Suite #1810, Atlanta, GA 30309, USA)
- Caitlin Clarke
(The Nature Conservancy, 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100, Arlington, VA 22203, USA)
- Yangyang Wang
(The Nature Conservancy, 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100, Arlington, VA 22203, USA)
- Ethan Belair
(The Nature Conservancy, 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100, Arlington, VA 22203, USA)
- Steve Marshall
(Mass Timber Strategy, LLC, Washington, DC 20016, USA)
- Hongmei Gu
(USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 53726, USA)
- Prakash Nepal
(USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 53726, USA)
- Franz Dolezal
(IBO—Austrian Institute for Building and Ecology, 1090 Vienna, Austria)
- Guy Lomax
(Global Systems Institute, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PY, UK)
- Craig Johnston
(Independent Researcher, Ottawa, ON K2G 0V1, Canada)
- Gabriel Felmer
(Instituto de la Vivienda, Facultad de Arquitectura y Urbanismo, Universidad de Chile, Santiago 8331051, Chile)
- Rodrigo Morales-Vera
(Centro de Biotecnología de Los Recursos Naturales (CENBIO), Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias y Forestales, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca 3480112, Chile)
- Maureen Puettmann
(CORRIM—Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials, Corvallis, OR 97339, USA)
- Robyn Van den Huevel
(Dalberg Catalyst, Johannesburg 2196, South Africa)
Abstract
As the need to address climate change grows more urgent, policymakers, businesses, and others are seeking innovative approaches to remove carbon dioxide emissions from the atmosphere and decarbonize hard-to-abate sectors. Forests can play a role in reducing atmospheric carbon. However, there is disagreement over whether forests are most effective in reducing carbon emissions when left alone versus managed for sustainable harvesting and wood product production. Cross-laminated timber is at the forefront of the mass timber movement, which is enabling designers, engineers, and other stakeholders to build taller wood buildings. Several recent studies have shown that substituting mass timber for steel and concrete in mid-rise buildings can reduce the emissions associated with manufacturing, transporting, and installing building materials by 13%-26.5%. However, the prospect of increased utilization of wood products as a climate solution also raises questions about the impact of increased demand for wood on forest carbon stocks, on forest condition, and on the provision of the many other critical social and environmental benefits that healthy forests can provide. A holistic assessment of the total climate impact of forest product demand across product substitution, carbon storage in materials, current and future forest carbon stock, and forest area and condition is challenging, but it is important to understand the impact of increased mass timber utilization on forests and climate, and therefore also on which safeguards might be necessary to ensure positive outcomes. To thus assess the potential impacts, both positive and negative, of greater mass timber utilization on forests ecosystems and emissions associated with the built environment, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) initiated a global mass timber impact assessment (GMTIA), a five-part, highly collaborative research program focused on understanding the potential benefits and risks of increased demand for mass timber products on forests and identifying appropriate safeguards to ensure positive outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Rachel Pasternack & Mark Wishnie & Caitlin Clarke & Yangyang Wang & Ethan Belair & Steve Marshall & Hongmei Gu & Prakash Nepal & Franz Dolezal & Guy Lomax & Craig Johnston & Gabriel Felmer & Rodrigo M, 2022.
"What Is the Impact of Mass Timber Utilization on Climate and Forests?,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-8, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:758-:d:721939
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Tran, Huy & Juno, Edie & Arunachalam, Saravanan, 2023.
"Emissions of wood pelletization and bioenergy use in the United States,"
Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
- Joseph Abed & Scott Rayburg & John Rodwell & Melissa Neave, 2022.
"A Review of the Performance and Benefits of Mass Timber as an Alternative to Concrete and Steel for Improving the Sustainability of Structures,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, May.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:758-:d:721939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.