Author
Listed:
- Chen Xu
(College of Landscape Architecture and Tourism, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China)
- Xianliang Zhang
(College of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China)
- Rocío Hernandez-Clemente
(Department of Geography, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK)
- Wei Lu
(College of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding 071001, China)
- Rubén D. Manzanedo
(Department of Environmental Systems Science, Institute of Integrative Biology, D-USYS, ETH-Zürich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland)
Abstract
Forest types are generally identified using vegetation or land-use types. However, vegetation classifications less frequently consider the actual forest attributes within each type. To address this in an objective way across different regions and to link forest attributes with their climate, we aimed to improve the distribution of forest types to be more realistic and useful for biodiversity preservation, forest management, and ecological and forestry research. The forest types were classified using an unsupervised cluster analysis method by combining climate variables with normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) data. Unforested regions were masked out to constrict our study to forest type distributions, using a 20% tree cover threshold. Descriptive names were given to the defined forest types based on annual temperature, precipitation, and NDVI values. Forest types had distinct climate and vegetation characteristics. Regions with similar NDVI values, but with different climate characteristics, which would be merged in previous classifications, could be clearly distinguished. However, small-range forest types, such as montane forests, were challenging to differentiate. At macroscale, the resulting forest types are largely consistent with land-cover types or vegetation types defined in previous studies. However, considering both potential and current vegetation data allowed us to create a more realistic type distribution that differentiates actual vegetation types and thus can be more informative for forest managers, conservationists, and forest ecologists. The newly generated forest type distribution is freely available to download and use for non-commercial purposes as a GeoTIFF file via doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19197.90082).
Suggested Citation
Chen Xu & Xianliang Zhang & Rocío Hernandez-Clemente & Wei Lu & Rubén D. Manzanedo, 2022.
"Global Forest Types Based on Climatic and Vegetation Data,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, January.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:634-:d:719454
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:634-:d:719454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.