IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p630-d719319.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Travel Mode Preference of External Trips for Smart City Transportation Planning: Sejong, Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Jin-Ki Eom

    (Railroad Policy Research Department, Korea Railroad Research Institute, Seoul 16105, Korea)

  • Kwang-Sub Lee

    (Railroad Policy Research Department, Korea Railroad Research Institute, Seoul 16105, Korea)

  • Sangpil Ko

    (Railroad Policy Research Department, Korea Railroad Research Institute, Seoul 16105, Korea)

  • Jun Lee

    (Railroad Policy Research Department, Korea Railroad Research Institute, Seoul 16105, Korea)

Abstract

In the face of growing concerns about urban problems, smart cities have emerged as a promising solution to address the challenges, for future sustainable societies in cities. Since the early 2000s, 67 local governments in Korea have been participating in smart city projects, as of 2019. The Sejong 5-1 Living Area smart city was selected as one of two pilot national demonstration smart cities. The main objectives of this study are to introduce the Sejong 5-1 Living Area smart city project that is currently in the planning stage, present travel and mode preferences focusing on external trips in a smart city context to be built, and analyze a mode choice model according to the socioeconomic characteristics of individual travelers. One of the distinguishing features of the Sejong smart city is its transportation design concept of designating a sharing car-only district within the city to limit private vehicle ownership to about one-third of residents, while bus rapid transit (BRT) plays a central role in mobility for external trips among four transport modes including private cars, BRT, carsharing, and ridesharing. This study was analyzed using the stated preference survey data under hypothetical conditions by reflecting the unique characteristics of the Sejong smart city transportation policy. Approximately two-thirds of respondents in the survey preferred to spend less than 1.25 USD, traveling less than 35 min on BRT trips. On the basis of the survey data, we developed a mixed logit mode choice model and found the overall model estimates to be statistically significant and reasonable. All people-specific variables examined in this study were associated with mode choices for external commuting trips, including age, income, household size, major mode, driving ability, and presence of preschoolers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin-Ki Eom & Kwang-Sub Lee & Sangpil Ko & Jun Lee, 2022. "Exploring Travel Mode Preference of External Trips for Smart City Transportation Planning: Sejong, Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:630-:d:719319
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/630/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/630/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tinessa, Fiore & Román Garcia, Concepción & Simonelli, Fulvio & Papola, Andrea & Pagliara, Francesca, 2024. "How public transport users would react to different pandemic alert scenarios in the post-vaccine era? An analysis of preferences and attitudes of the users in the metropolitan area of Naples (Italy)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:630-:d:719319. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.