IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i24p16499-d998569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quintuple Helix Innovation Model for the European Union Defense Industry—An Empirical Research

Author

Listed:
  • João Reis

    (Industrial Engineering and Management, Faculty of Engineering, Lusofona University and EIGeS, Campo Grande, 1749-024 Lisbon, Portugal
    Research and Development Center, Instituto Universitário Militar, Rua de Pedrouços, 1449-027 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • David Pascoal Rosado

    (Center for Research, Development, and Innovation (CINAMIL), Academia Militar, Rua Gomes de Freire 203, 1169-203 Lisboa, Portugal
    Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Tecnologia (FCST), Universidade Europeia, Estrada da Correia, 53, 1500-210 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Diogo Freitas Ribeiro

    (Center for Research, Development, and Innovation (CINAMIL), Academia Militar, Rua Gomes de Freire 203, 1169-203 Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Nuno Melão

    (CISeD–Research Centre in Digital Services, Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, Campus Politécnico, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal)

Abstract

The European defense industry is undergoing profound upheavals, and traditional innovation models may no longer be adequate. For this reason, further investigation is needed to know if the triple helix (TH) is suitable for one of the most influential industries in the world. If not suitable, it is necessary to identify which type of n-helices are appropriate. This article follows an embedded case study research strategy that uses several sources of data collection such as interviews with active-duty military personnel, scholars, the defense industry, and interagency professionals. Field notes and official documentation were also collected for corroboration and triangulation purposes. The results showed that the defense industry is increasingly globalized, leaving the national sphere and weakening the action and participation of European Union governments. This research resulted in the design of a quintuple helix innovation model for the defense industry, which was based on a TH combined with technology and the natural environment. We concluded that the traditional TH may not be adequate for the entry of new supranational players and that political contributions are subject to a further response by the European states. Scientific research is also needed, especially in Asian and American countries, which have national defense policies different from those of Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • João Reis & David Pascoal Rosado & Diogo Freitas Ribeiro & Nuno Melão, 2022. "Quintuple Helix Innovation Model for the European Union Defense Industry—An Empirical Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16499-:d:998569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16499/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/24/16499/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chunyan Zhou & Henry Etzkowitz, 2021. "Triple Helix Twins: A Framework for Achieving Innovation and UN Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Bruno Martinho & João Reis, 2022. "United Nations (UN) Disaster Risk Reduction Framework: Case Study of the Portuguese Army on UN Challenges in the Context of Sustainable Risk Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Langlois, Jonathan & BenMahmoud-Jouini, Sihem & Servajean-Hilst, Romaric, 2023. "Practicing secrecy in open innovation – The case of a military firm," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    4. Sharma, Abhijit & Sousa, Cristina & Woodward, Richard, 2022. "Determinants of innovation outcomes: The role of institutional quality," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. João Reis & David Pascoal Rosado & Yuval Cohen & César Pousa & Adriane Cavalieri, 2022. "Green Defense Industries in the European Union: The Case of the Battle Dress Uniform for Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Christos Kollias, 2008. "A Preliminary Investigation Of The Burden Sharing Aspects Of A European Union Common Defence Policy," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 253-263.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Othmani, Abdelhafidh & Ben Yedder, Nadia & Bakari, Sayef, 2023. "The Cointegration Relationship between Patent, Domestic Investment and Economic Growth in United States of America," MPRA Paper 118245, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. BOWERS Dominique & MATLALA Ntswaki & BERHADIEN Moegamat & UMETOR Henry & GONGXEKA Thabo, 2024. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management And Disruptive Theory: A Bibliometric Review," Management of Sustainable Development, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 16(1), pages 11-23, June.
    3. Otioma, Chuks & Nsanzumuhire, Silas U. & Grillitsch, Markus & Jirström, Magnus, 2023. "Seeking for the shift towards challenge-oriented innovation policies: Tracing digitalization policies over two decades in Africa," Papers in Innovation Studies 2023/9, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    4. Victor Ginsburgh & Juan D. Moreno‐Ternero, 2022. "Brexit and multilingualism in the European Union," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 708-731, May.
    5. B. Senakumari Arunnima & Dharmaseelan Bijulal & R. Sudhir Kumar, 2023. "Open Innovation Intellectual Property Risk Maturity Model: An Approach to Measure Intellectual Property Risks of Software Firms Engaged in Open Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Xiaoqing Ai & Hongda Zhang & Keyu Guo & Fubin Shi, 2022. "Does Regional Innovation Environment Have an Impact on the Gathering of Technological Talent? An Empirical Study Based on 31 Provinces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Fedorenko, Ivan & Berthon, Pierre & Edelman, Linda, 2023. "Top secret: Integrating 20 years of research on secrecy," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    8. Justin George & Todd Sandler, 2021. "EU Demand for Defense, 1990–2019: A Strategic Spatial Approach," Games, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Wen, Jun & Zhao, Xin-Xin & Fu, Qiang & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2023. "The impact of extreme weather events on green innovation: Which ones bring to the most harm?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    10. Reiter, Andreas & Stonig, Joachim & Frankenberger, Karolin, 2024. "Managing multi-tiered innovation ecosystems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    11. Danta, Subal & Rath, Badri Narayan, 2024. "Do institutional quality and human capital matter for innovation in case of Asian region?," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(3).
    12. Tang, Jinghua & Liu, Qigui, 2024. "R&D tax incentive policy, intellectual property right protection, and corporate innovation in an emerging market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    13. Marti, Luisa & Puertas, Rosa, 2023. "Analysis of European competitiveness based on its innovative capacity and digitalization level," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Bogers Marion & Beeres Robert, 2013. "Mission Afghanistan: Who Bears the Heaviest Burden," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 32-55, April.
    15. Donis, Silvia & Gómez, Jaime & Salazar, Idana, 2023. "Economic complexity, property rights and the judicial system as drivers of eco-innovations: An analysis of OECD countries," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    16. Barbara Bigliardi & Serena Filippelli, 2022. "Sustainability and Open Innovation: Main Themes and Research Trajectories," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    17. Matteo Trane & Luisa Marelli & Alice Siragusa & Riccardo Pollo & Patrizia Lombardi, 2023. "Progress by Research to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals in the EU: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-37, April.
    18. Dogan Kesap & Ali Riza Sandalcilar, 2024. "Panel Causality Analysis of the Relationship among the Rule of Law, Technological Advances, Competitiveness, and Value-Added," Istanbul Journal of Economics-Istanbul Iktisat Dergisi, Istanbul University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 73(74-1), pages 159-191., June.
    19. Ilenia Spadaro & Francesca Pirlone & Fabrizio Bruno & Gianluca Saba & Barbara Poggio & Sabrina Bruzzone, 2023. "Stakeholder Participation in Planning of a Sustainable and Competitive Tourism Destination: The Genoa Integrated Action Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-30, March.
    20. Alma Mačiulytė-Šniukienė & Mindaugas Butkus & Renata Macaitienė & Vida Davidavičienė, 2022. "Infrastructure and EU Regional Convergence: What Policy Implications Does Non-Linearity Bring?," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:24:p:16499-:d:998569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.