IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16318-d995555.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Fuzzy Inference System Based Rapid Visual Screening Method for Seismic Assessment of Buildings Presented on a Case Study of URM Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Nurullah Bektaş

    (Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary)

  • Ferenc Lilik

    (Department of Telecommunications, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary)

  • Orsolya Kegyes-Brassai

    (Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Széchenyi István University, 9026 Győr, Hungary)

Abstract

Many conventional rapid visual screening (RVS) methods for the seismic assessment of existing structures have been designed over the past three decades, tailored to site-specific building features. The objective of implementing RVS is to identify the buildings most susceptible to earthquake-induced damage. RVS methods are utilized to classify buildings according to their risk level to prioritize the buildings at high seismic risk. The conventional RVS methods are employed to determine the damage after an earthquake or to make safety assessments in order to predict the damage that may occur in a building before an impending earthquake. Due to the subjectivity of the screener based on visual examination, previous research has shown that these conventional methods can lead to vagueness and uncertainty. Additionally, because RVS methods were found to be conservative and to be partially accurate, as well as the fact that some expert opinion based developed RVS techniques do not have the capability of further enhancement, it was recommended that RVS methods be developed. Therefore, this paper discusses a fuzzy logic based RVS method development to produce an accurate building features responsive examination method for unreinforced masonry (URM) structures, as well as a way of revising existing RVS methods. In this context, RVS parameters are used in a fuzzy-inference system hierarchical computational pattern to develop the RVS method. The fuzzy inference system based RVS method was developed considering post-earthquake building screening data of 40 URM structures located in Albania following the earthquake in 2019 as a case study. In addition, FEMA P-154, a conventional RVS method, was employed to screen considered buildings to comparatively demonstrate the efficiency of the developed RVS method in this study. The findings of the study revealed that the proposed method with an accuracy of 67.5% strongly outperformed the conventional RVS method by 42.5%.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurullah Bektaş & Ferenc Lilik & Orsolya Kegyes-Brassai, 2022. "Development of a Fuzzy Inference System Based Rapid Visual Screening Method for Seismic Assessment of Buildings Presented on a Case Study of URM Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16318-:d:995555
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16318/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16318/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luca Sbrogiò & Ylenia Saretta & Francesco Molinari & Maria Rosa Valluzzi, 2022. "Multilevel Assessment of Seismic Damage and Vulnerability of Masonry Buildings (MUSE-DV) in Historical Centers: Development of a Mobile Android Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Nurullah Bektaş & Orsolya Kegyes-Brassai, 2022. "Conventional RVS Methods for Seismic Risk Assessment for Estimating the Current Situation of Existing Buildings: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-40, February.
    3. N. Alam & M. Alam & S. Tesfamariam, 2012. "Buildings’ seismic vulnerability assessment methods: a comparative study," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 62(2), pages 405-424, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Rosa Valluzzi & Veronica Follador & Luca Sbrogiò, 2023. "Vulnus Web: A Web-Based Procedure for the Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Masonry Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Weiyi & Zhang, Limao, 2021. "Resilience assessment of regional areas against earthquakes using multi-source information fusion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Md. Mashrur Rahman & Uttama Barua & Farzana Khatun & Ishrat Islam & Rezwana Rafiq, 2018. "Participatory Vulnerability Reduction (PVR): an urban community-based approach for earthquake management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 93(3), pages 1479-1505, September.
    3. Navdeep Agrawal & Laxmi Gupta & Jagabandhu Dixit, 2021. "Assessment of the Socioeconomic Vulnerability to Seismic Hazards in the National Capital Region of India Using Factor Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Guangyun Gao & Shaofeng Yao & Yujun Cui & Qingsheng Chen & Xianlin Zhang & Kewen Wang, 2018. "Zoning of confined aquifers inrush and quicksand in Shanghai region," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(3), pages 1341-1363, April.
    5. Maria Rosa Valluzzi & Veronica Follador & Luca Sbrogiò, 2023. "Vulnus Web: A Web-Based Procedure for the Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Masonry Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, April.
    6. Nurullah Bektaş & Orsolya Kegyes-Brassai, 2022. "Conventional RVS Methods for Seismic Risk Assessment for Estimating the Current Situation of Existing Buildings: A State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-40, February.
    7. Alexandru Banica & Lucian Rosu & Ionel Muntele & Adrian Grozavu, 2017. "Towards Urban Resilience: A Multi-Criteria Analysis of Seismic Vulnerability in Iasi City (Romania)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16318-:d:995555. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.