IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p16157-d992439.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Derivatives-Directed International Supervision Laws and Regulations and Carbon Market Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Yao Cheng

    (Law School, Liaoning University, Shenyang 110036, China)

Abstract

With the global acknowledgment of the Kyoto Protocol came the carbon derivatives such as carbon futures, options, and swap contracts. The innovative carbon derivatives are complex in design and contain risks that are difficult to predict and avoid. The global Carbon Market should have higher requirements in the supervision laws and regulations. To this end, the financial system theories and the financial characteristics of carbon derivatives are expounded. The three-dimensional structural modeling technique of systems engineering is introduced to construct the Carbon Market framework. The proposed framework factors for the organization, product, and policy dimensions of the Carbon Market are also described. Additionally, this model explains the market organization, the instruments and media connecting market supply and demand, and government regulation measures. In particular, the supervision and management aspects of the policy dimension are introduced in detail. The Carbon Market and relevant law systems in the United States, the European Union, and India are mainly studied and compared. Based on the comparison results, the necessity of market supervision is explained. Finally, the Big Vector Autoregression model is used to study the relationship between the Carbon Market, energy market, and financial market. After the introduction of the National Carbon Market, the correlation between the energy market and the financial market has become relatively complex but also presents a certain degree of asymmetry. According to the above results, the paper proposes to use the “regulatory sandbox” mechanism to improve the regulation of the subject and object of the carbon financial and legal relationship and try to carry out regulatory innovation for the risks of the entire carbon market.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao Cheng, 2022. "Carbon Derivatives-Directed International Supervision Laws and Regulations and Carbon Market Mechanism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16157-:d:992439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16157/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/16157/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Kambhu & Til Schuermann & Kevin J. Stiroh, 2007. "Hedge funds, financial intermediation, and systemic risk," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 13(Dec), pages 1-18.
    2. Tiziano Squartini & Guido Caldarelli & Giulio Cimini & Andrea Gabrielli & Diego Garlaschelli, 2018. "Reconstruction methods for networks: the case of economic and financial systems," Papers 1806.06941, arXiv.org.
    3. Hodgson, Geoffrey M. & Ménard, Claude & Shirley, Mary M. & Wang, Ning, 2015. "Introduction to the Ronald H. Coase memorial issue," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 213-219, June.
    4. Gareth Bryant, 2018. "Nature as Accumulation Strategy? Finance, Nature, and Value in Carbon Markets," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(3), pages 605-619, May.
    5. Lannoo, Karel & Thomadakis, Apostolos, 2020. "Derivatives in Sustainable Finance," ECMI Papers 29791, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    6. Rui Zhu & Liyu Long & Yinghua Gong, 2022. "Emission Trading System, Carbon Market Efficiency, and Corporate Innovations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Maamoun, Nada, 2019. "The Kyoto protocol: Empirical evidence of a hidden success," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 227-256.
    8. Darryll Hendricks & John Kambhu & Patricia C. Mosser, 2007. "Appendix B: Systemic risk and the financial system (background paper)," Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, vol. 13(Nov), pages 65-80.
    9. Carlos Hervés-Beloso & Emma Moreno-García, 2022. "Revisiting the Coase theorem," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 73(2), pages 421-438, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crimmel, Jeremy & Elyasiani, Elyas, 2021. "The association between financial market volatility and banking market structure," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 335-349.
    2. William R. Morgan, 2023. "Finance Must Be Defended: Cybernetics, Neoliberalism and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Xu, Hai-Chuan & Wang, Zhi-Yuan & Jawadi, Fredj & Zhou, Wei-Xing, 2023. "Reconstruction of international energy trade networks with given marginal data: A comparative analysis," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    4. Ramadiah, Amanah & Caccioli, Fabio & Fricke, Daniel, 2020. "Reconstructing and stress testing credit networks," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Alessandro Ferracci & Giulio Cimini, 2021. "Systemic risk in interbank networks: disentangling balance sheets and network effects," Papers 2109.14360, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    6. Małgorzata Janicka & Aleksandra Pieloch-Babiarz & Artur Sajnóg, 2020. "Does Short-Termism Influence the Market Value of Companies? Evidence from EU Countries," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, November.
    7. Kurt Dew, 2008. "The Definition of Bank and the Subprime Mortgage Crisis: Tying Bank Regulation to Banks’ Risk-Return Trade-offs in the 21st Century," NFI Working Papers 2007-WP-17B, Indiana State University, Scott College of Business, Networks Financial Institute.
    8. Oet, Mikhail V. & Bianco, Timothy & Gramlich, Dieter & Ong, Stephen J., 2013. "SAFE: An early warning system for systemic banking risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 4510-4533.
    9. Hwang, Inchang & Xu, Simon & In, Francis & Kim, Tong Suk, 2017. "Systemic risk and cross-sectional hedge fund returns," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 109-130.
    10. Pata, Ugur Korkut & Ertugrul, Hasan Murat, 2023. "Do the Kyoto Protocol, geopolitical risks, human capital and natural resources affect the sustainability limit? A new environmental approach based on the LCC hypothesis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Cary, Michael, 2023. "Climate policy boosts trade competitiveness: Evidence from timber trade networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    12. Bernal, Oscar & Gnabo, Jean-Yves & Guilmin, Grégory, 2014. "Assessing the contribution of banks, insurance and other financial services to systemic risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 270-287.
    13. Lee, Yan-Li & Zhou, Tao, 2021. "Collaborative filtering approach to link prediction," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 578(C).
    14. Yang Lv & Xinhua Bi & Quanxi Li & Haowei Zhang, 2022. "Research on Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision Making and Recycling Channel Selection under Carbon Allowance and Carbon Trading," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Tinevimbo Santu Chokuda & Njabulo Nkomazana & Wilford Mawanza, 2017. "A Bank Failure Prediction Model for Zimbabwe: A Corporate Governance Perspective," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 9(1), pages 207-216.
    16. Franck Martin & Mai lan Nguyen, 2015. "Asymmetric dynamics in the correlations of hedge fund strategy indices: what lessons about financial contagion ?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(4), pages 2110-2125.
    17. Lewis C. King & Jeroen C. J. M. Bergh, 2021. "Potential carbon leakage under the Paris Agreement," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(3), pages 1-19, April.
    18. Thomadakis, Apostolos, 2021. "2020 ECMI Statistical Package: key findings," ECMI Papers 32242, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    19. Diana Zigraiova & Petr Jakubik, 2014. "Systemic Event Prediction by Early Warning System," Working Papers IES 2014/01, Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, Institute of Economic Studies, revised Jan 2014.
    20. Shaolong Zeng & Qinyi Fu & Danni Yang & Yihua Tian & Yang Yu, 2023. "The Influencing Factors of the Carbon Trading Price: A Case of China against a “Double Carbon” Background," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:16157-:d:992439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.