IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15822-d986692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of Chinese Rapeseed Production Efficiency Based on Three-Stage DEA and Malmquist Index

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Li

    (School of management, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China)

  • Cong Wang

    (School of management, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China)

Abstract

As a widely grown oil crop in China, rapeseed accounts for 38.6% of China’s total oil crop production. In order to ensure the sustainable and healthy development of the rapeseed industry, this essay uses the input-output panel data of 15 central rapeseed-producing provinces (cities) in China from 2011 to 2019. The reasons for the change of the index were further studied using three-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the Malmquist method. The three-stage DEA results show that the scale efficiency of rapeseed production increases in other provinces, except in Qinghai Province and Gansu Province, and that scale efficiency can be improved through additional investment. Planting enterprises can improve their efficiency by improving the efficiency of scientific and technological progress. On the other hand, government expenditure has a positive impact on rapeseed production efficiency. The Malmquist index shows that the technical progress efficiency index has the most significant impact during this period and the rapeseed total factor productivity can be improved by improving technological progress efficiency. In addition, according to the measured results, corresponding suggestions are put forward.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Li & Cong Wang, 2022. "An Evaluation of Chinese Rapeseed Production Efficiency Based on Three-Stage DEA and Malmquist Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15822-:d:986692
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15822/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15822/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H. Fried & C. Lovell & S. Schmidt & S. Yaisawarng, 2002. "Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 157-174, January.
    2. Jondrow, James & Knox Lovell, C. A. & Materov, Ivan S. & Schmidt, Peter, 1982. "On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 19(2-3), pages 233-238, August.
    3. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parkhomets, Mykola & Uniiat, Liudmyla & Chornyi, Roman & Chorna, Nelia & Hradovyi, Vasyl, 2023. "Efficiency of production and processing of rapeseed for biodiesel in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(2), June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angela Stefania Bergantino & Enrico Musso, 2011. "A Multi-step Approach to Model the Relative Efficiency of European Ports: The Role of Regulation and Other Non-discretionary Factors," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.), International Handbook of Maritime Economics, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Avkiran, Necmi K. & Rowlands, Terry, 2008. "How to better identify the true managerial performance: State of the art using DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 317-324, April.
    3. Wang, Zhaohua & Li, Yi & Wang, Ke & Huang, Zhimin, 2017. "Environment-adjusted operational performance evaluation of solar photovoltaic power plants: A three stage efficiency analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1153-1162.
    4. Haoran Zhao & Huiru Zhao & Sen Guo, 2018. "Operational Efficiency of Chinese Provincial Electricity Grid Enterprises: An Evaluation Employing a Three-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Geng Peng & Xiaodan Zhang & Fang Liu & Lijuan Ruan & Kaiyou Tian, 2021. "Spatial–temporal evolution and regional difference decomposition of urban environmental governance efficiency in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 8974-8990, June.
    6. Qi Yang & Zhonggen Sun & Hubiao Zhang, 2022. "Assessment of Urban Green Development Efficiency Based on Three-Stage DEA: A Case Study from China’s Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Huang, Tai-Hsin & Chiang, Dien-Lin & Lin, Chung-I, 2017. "A new approach to estimating a profit frontier using the censored stochastic frontier model," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 68-77.
    8. Zhao, Haoran & Guo, Sen & Zhao, Huiru, 2019. "Provincial energy efficiency of China quantified by three-stage data envelopment analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 96-107.
    9. Jie Wu & Ganggang Zhang & Qingyuan Zhu & Zhixiang Zhou, 2020. "An efficiency analysis of higher education institutions in China from a regional perspective considering the external environmental impact," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 57-70, January.
    10. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2015. "Efficiency of the banking system in Vietnam under financial liberalization," OSF Preprints qsf6d, Center for Open Science.
    11. Jinkai Li & Jingjing Ma & Wei Wei, 2020. "Analysis and Evaluation of the Regional Characteristics of Carbon Emission Efficiency for China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Zeng, Shihong & Jiang, Chunxia & Ma, Chen & Su, Bin, 2018. "Investment efficiency of the new energy industry in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 536-544.
    13. Mingli Song & Guangshe Jia & Puwei Zhang, 2020. "An Evaluation of Air Transport Sector Operational Efficiency in China based on a Three-Stage DEA Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Zhong Fang & Hua Bai & Yuriy Bilan, 2019. "Evaluation Research of Green Innovation Efficiency in China’s Heavy Polluting Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    15. Huang, Daohan & Li, Guijun & Chang, Yuan & Sun, Chengshuang, 2023. "Water, energy, and food nexus efficiency in China: A provincial assessment using a three-stage data envelopment analysis model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    16. Xiao Gong & Jianing Mi & Chunyan Wei & Ruitao Yang, 2019. "Measuring Environmental and Economic Performance of Air Pollution Control for Province-Level Areas in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-19, April.
    17. Liu, Fangmei & Li, Li & Ye, Bin & Qin, Quande, 2023. "A novel stochastic semi-parametric frontier-based three-stage DEA window model to evaluate China's industrial green economic efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    18. Bin Lu & Ke Wang & Zhiqiang Xu, 2016. "China's regional energy efficiency: Results based on three-stage DEA model," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 89, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    19. Jingqi Sun & Nuermaimaiti Ruze & Jianjun Zhang & Haoran Zhao & Boyang Shen, 2019. "Evaluating the Investment Efficiency of China’s Provincial Power Grid Enterprises under New Electricity Market Reform: Empirical Evidence Based on Three-Stage DEA Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Franz R. Hahn, 2007. "Determinants of Bank Efficiency in Europe. Assessing Bank Performance Across Markets," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 31499.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15822-:d:986692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.