IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15557-d981287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recycling of Post-Use Bioprocessing Plastic Containers—Mechanical Recycling Technical Feasibility

Author

Listed:
  • Duc-Nam Luu

    (Arts et Métiers Institute of Technology, LCPI, HESAM Université, 151 boulevard de l’Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
    Sanofi, 82, Avenue Raspail, 94250 Gentilly, France)

  • Magali Barbaroux

    (Sartorius, ZI des Paluds, Avenue de Jouques, 13400 Aubagne, France)

  • Gaelle Dorez

    (Veolia Recherche & Innovation, Zone Portuaire, 291 Avenue Dreyfous Ducas, 78520 Limay, France)

  • Katell Mignot

    (Sartorius, ZI des Paluds, Avenue de Jouques, 13400 Aubagne, France)

  • Estelle Doger

    (Sanofi Pasteur Lyon Carteret, 14 Espace Henry Vallée, 69007 Lyon, France)

  • Achille Laurent

    (Sanofi, 82, Avenue Raspail, 94250 Gentilly, France)

  • Jean-Michel Brossard

    (Veolia Recherche & Innovation, Zone Portuaire, 291 Avenue Dreyfous Ducas, 78520 Limay, France)

  • Claus-Jürgen Maier

    (Sanofi, Industriepark Höchst, 65926 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Abstract

Most of the plastic-based solutions used in bio-manufacturing are today incinerated after use, even the not “bio-contaminated”. Bioprocessing bags used for media and buffer preparation and storage represent the largest amount today. The aim of this work was to technically assess the feasibility of the mechanical recycling of bioprocessing bags. Materials from different sorting and recycling strategies have been characterized, for their suitability of further use. Quantitative physical and mechanical tests and analysis (FTIR, DSC, TGA, density, MFI, color, tensile, flexural, and Charpy choc) were performed. The data show that these recycled plastics could be oriented towards second use requiring physical properties similar to equivalent virgin materials. A comparative life cycle assessment, based on a theoretical framework, shows that mechanical recycling for end of life presents the advantage of keeping material in the loop, without showing a significant statistical difference compared to incineration with regards to the climate change indicator.

Suggested Citation

  • Duc-Nam Luu & Magali Barbaroux & Gaelle Dorez & Katell Mignot & Estelle Doger & Achille Laurent & Jean-Michel Brossard & Claus-Jürgen Maier, 2022. "Recycling of Post-Use Bioprocessing Plastic Containers—Mechanical Recycling Technical Feasibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15557-:d:981287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15557/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15557/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joshua K Abbott & U Rashid Sumaila, 2019. "Reducing Marine Plastic Pollution: Policy Insights from Economics," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 13(2), pages 327-336.
    2. Bethanie Carney Almroth & Håkan Eggert, 2019. "Marine Plastic Pollution: Sources, Impacts, and Policy Issues," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 13(2), pages 317-326.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grilli, Gaetano & Andrews, Barnaby & Ferrini, Silvia & Luisetti, Tiziana, 2022. "Could a mix of short- and long-term policies be the solution to tackle marine litter? Insights from a choice experiment in England and Ireland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    2. Xiaowei Ni & Yongbo Quan, 2023. "Measuring the Sustainable Development of Marine Economy Based on the Entropy Value Method: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Delta, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Rumana Hossain & Md Tasbirul Islam & Riya Shanker & Debishree Khan & Katherine Elizabeth Sarah Locock & Anirban Ghose & Heinz Schandl & Rita Dhodapkar & Veena Sahajwalla, 2022. "Plastic Waste Management in India: Challenges, Opportunities, and Roadmap for Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-34, April.
    4. Tobias Börger & Nick Hanley & Robert J. Johnston & Keila Meginnis & Tom Ndebele & Ghamz E. Ali Siyal & Frans de Vries, 2024. "Equity preferences and abatement cost sharing in international environmental agreements," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(1), pages 416-441, January.
    5. Zhuxuan Yan & Juliann Cortese, 2023. "I Can Feel Your Pain: Investigating the Role of Empathy and Guilt on Sustainable Behavioral Intentions to Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle Plastic Bags among College Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Hirotaka Kumamaru & Kenji Takeuchi, 2023. "The recycled content of plastic products: estimating the impact of a recycling law on the input mix," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 25(3), pages 355-376, July.
    7. Victor Virimai Mugobo & Herbert Ntuli, 2022. "Consumer Preference for Attributes of Single-Use and Multi-Use Plastic Shopping Bags in Cape Town: A Choice Experiment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    8. Mohammad Izadi & Mahmood Parsamanesh & Waleed Adel, 2022. "Numerical and Stability Investigations of the Waste Plastic Management Model in the Ocean System," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-26, December.
    9. Adriana Abril Ortiz & Dolores Sucozhañay & Paul Vanegas & Andrés Martínez-Moscoso, 2020. "A Regional Response to a Global Problem: Single Use Plastics Regulation in the Countries of the Pacific Alliance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15557-:d:981287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.