IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15395-d977695.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods for Calculation of Stormwater Treatment Required for Meeting Receiving Waters Quality: Application in a Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Larm

    (StormTac Corporation, SE-116 40 Stockholm, Sweden)

  • Anna Wahlsten

    (StormTac Corporation, SE-116 40 Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

There is a need for tools relating stormwater effluent quality data to the ambient water quality guidelines listed, e.g., in the EU Water Framework Directive. We conducted a literature study and identified four methods to calculate the annual required treatment loads (kg/year) to satisfy the guidelines: (1) StormTac Web, (2) the Vollenweider OECD load model, (3) the model developed by the Swedish Water Authorities and SMHI, and (4) the method using effluent concentration criteria. In this paper, we compile and derive new equations based on these methods to enable calculation of annual acceptable load (kg/year) and annual required treatment load (kg/year) for different types of receiving waters and substances, i.e., not only nutrients but also priority chemicals listed in the Water Framework Directive. Obligatory input data consist of calculated or measured annual flow (runoff and baseflow), actual concentrations and criteria concentrations in the receiving water, or criteria concentration for discharge to the receiving waters. The four methods were applied to address total phosphorus in the urban watercourse of Bällstaån, Sweden. Results showed agreement of the calculated required treatment removals with measured phosphorus concentrations in the receiving water when Methods 1–2 were used but more varied results for Methods 3–4, which neglect the receiving waters concentrations and criteria. Based on these results, we recommend Methods 1–2 for use and further evaluation in projects related to improvements in the quality of receiving waters, as they are based on water quality criteria in the receiving waters themselves. Further investigations regarding input data, complementary measurements, and an evaluation of the validity for substances other than nutrients are recommended to improve the accuracy of calculations.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Larm & Anna Wahlsten, 2022. "Methods for Calculation of Stormwater Treatment Required for Meeting Receiving Waters Quality: Application in a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15395-:d:977695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15395/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15395/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ditte M. R. Jensen & Anja T. H. Thomsen & Torben Larsen & Sara Egemose & Peter S. Mikkelsen, 2020. "From EU Directives to Local Stormwater Discharge Permits: A Study of Regulatory Uncertainty and Practice Gaps in Denmark," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-34, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhe Huang & Esther Laurentine Nya & Mohammad Azizur Rahman & Tulinave Burton Mwamila & Viet Cao & Willis Gwenzi & Chicgoua Noubactep, 2021. "Integrated Water Resource Management: Rethinking the Contribution of Rainwater Harvesting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-9, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15395-:d:977695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.