IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p15185-d974269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comfort Assessment and Optimization Based on FE Simulation for High-Speed Train Seats: Comparison with Different Design Parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Shufang Huang

    (School of Business, Hunan Industry Polytechnic, Changsha 410208, China)

  • Dayan Sun

    (School of Architectural Technology, Liuzhou Railway Vocational Technical College, Liuzhou 545616, China
    Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track of Ministry of Education, School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Joint International Research Laboratory of Key Technology for Rail Traffic Safety, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Liang Zhang

    (Chongqing Key Laboratory of Vehicle Crash/Bio-Impact and Traffic Safety, Institute for Traffic Medicine, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China)

  • Jiahao Zhou

    (Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track of Ministry of Education, School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
    Joint International Research Laboratory of Key Technology for Rail Traffic Safety, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China)

  • Zhihui Wang

    (School of Business, Hunan Industry Polytechnic, Changsha 410208, China)

Abstract

Nowadays, riding comfort is more significant than before for evaluating the quality of high–speed railways and sitting is the most common posture for its passengers. This study aimed to analyze and optimize the pressure distribution and sitting comfort of second–class seats with different design parameters. Firstly, 21 pressure features were calculated after the field sitting tests conducted on a CRH Train. The subjective comfort was quantified as a linear combination of 6 pressure features in 21, which were selected using stepwise regression analysis ( R 2 = 0.684). A seat-human finite element model was established using THUMS for a human body and MAT_57 for the seat foam. Finally, this study analyzed the effects of foam and seat angles on interface pressure distribution and comfort ratings. The set of design parameters with the highest comfort was selected from 12 free combinations. The results show that the seat foam with less stiffness may not improve sitting comfort due to the asymmetry of the seat frame. Moreover, appropriately increasing the stiffness of the cushion and backrest will not lead to a decrease in subjective feelings and the pressure distribution becomes more reasonable as the inclination angle increases within 10 degrees. The final optimization increases the computational comfort of the seat-human model by 6.5 in a −50 to 50 scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Shufang Huang & Dayan Sun & Liang Zhang & Jiahao Zhou & Zhihui Wang, 2022. "Comfort Assessment and Optimization Based on FE Simulation for High-Speed Train Seats: Comparison with Different Design Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15185-:d:974269
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15185/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/15185/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weitan Yin & Juyue Ding & Yi Qiu, 2021. "Nonlinear Dynamic Modelling of a Suspension Seat for Predicting the Vertical Seat Transmissibility," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-10, December.
    2. Corina Nüesch & Jan-Niklas Kreppke & Annegret Mündermann & Lars Donath, 2018. "Effects of a Dynamic Chair on Chair Seat Motion and Trunk Muscle Activity during Office Tasks and Task Transitions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Long Wang & Hao Fan & Jianjie Chu & Dengkai Chen & Suihuai Yu, 2021. "Effect of Personal Space Invasion on Passenger Comfort and Comfort Design of an Aircraft Cabin," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:15185-:d:974269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.