IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14603-d965189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Three Automated Identification Methods for Ground Object Based on UAV Imagery

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Zhang

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Graduate School of Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan)

  • Sarvesh Maskey

    (Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan)

  • Hiromu Okazawa

    (Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan)

  • Kiichiro Hayashi

    (Institute of Material and Systems for Sustainable, Nagoya University, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan)

  • Tamano Hayashi

    (Faculty of Advanced Science and Technology of Regional Environment Science, Ryukoku University, Kyoto 612-8577, Japan)

  • Ayako Sekiyama

    (Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan)

  • Sawahiko Shimada

    (Faculty of Regional Environment Science, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo 156-8502, Japan)

  • Lameck Fiwa

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe P.O. Box 219, Malawi)

Abstract

Identification and monitoring of diverse resources or wastes on the ground is important for integrated resource management. The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), with its high resolution and facility, is the optimal tool for monitoring ground objects accurately and efficiently. However, previous studies have focused on applying classification methodology on land use and agronomy, and few studies have compared different classification methods using UAV imagery. It is necessary to fully utilize the high resolution of UAV by applying the classification methodology to ground object identification. This study compared three classification methods: A. NDVI threshold, B. RGB image-based machine learning, and C. object-based image analysis (OBIA). Method A was the least time-consuming and could identify vegetation and soil with high accuracy (user’s accuracy > 0.80), but had poor performance at classifying dead vegetation, plastic, and metal (user’s accuracy < 0.50). Both Methods B and C were time- and labor-consuming, but had very high accuracy in separating vegetation, soil, plastic, and metal (user’s accuracy ≥ 0.70 for all classes). Method B showed a good performance in identifying objects with bright colors, whereas Method C showed a high ability in separating objects with similar visual appearances. Scientifically, this study has verified the possibility of using the existing classification methods on identifying small ground objects with a size of less than 1 m, and has discussed the reasons for the different accuracy of the three methods. Practically, these results help users from different fields to choose an appropriate method that suits their target, so that different wastes or multiple resources can be monitored at the same time by combining different methods, which contributes to an improved integrated resource management system.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Zhang & Sarvesh Maskey & Hiromu Okazawa & Kiichiro Hayashi & Tamano Hayashi & Ayako Sekiyama & Sawahiko Shimada & Lameck Fiwa, 2022. "Assessment of Three Automated Identification Methods for Ground Object Based on UAV Imagery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14603-:d:965189
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14603/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14603/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noudeng Vongdala & Hoang-Dung Tran & Tran Dang Xuan & Rolf Teschke & Tran Dang Khanh, 2018. "Heavy Metal Accumulation in Water, Soil, and Plants of Municipal Solid Waste Landfill in Vientiane, Laos," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Navarro Ferronato & Vincenzo Torretta, 2019. "Waste Mismanagement in Developing Countries: A Review of Global Issues," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martha María Mayes-Ramírez & Francisco Jesús Gálvez-Sánchez & Ángel Fermín Ramos-Ridao & Valentín Molina-Moreno, 2023. "Urban Waste: Visualizing the Academic Literature through Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Leslier Valenzuela-Fernández & Manuel Escobar-Farfán, 2022. "Zero-Waste Management and Sustainable Consumption: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Asif Iqbal & Abdullah Yasar & Abdul-Sattar Nizami & Rafia Haider & Faiza Sharif & Imran Ali Sultan & Amtul Bari Tabinda & Aman Anwer Kedwaii & Muhammad Murtaza Chaudhary, 2022. "Municipal Solid Waste Collection and Haulage Modeling Design for Lahore, Pakistan: Transition toward Sustainability and Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-39, December.
    4. Giovanni Vinti & Valerie Bauza & Thomas Clasen & Kate Medlicott & Terry Tudor & Christian Zurbrügg & Mentore Vaccari, 2021. "Municipal Solid Waste Management and Adverse Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-26, April.
    5. Ashfaq, Asma & Khan, Zafar Iqbal & Ahmad, Kafeel & Ashraf, Muhammad Arslan & Hussain, Muhammad Iftikhar & Elghareeb, Eman M., 2022. "Hazard of selenium metal contamination in vegetables grown in municipal solid waste amended soil: Assessment of the potential sources and systemic health effects," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    6. Jatau Ramond Yohanna, 2023. "Effluent Pollution in Custodial Centres and its Environs in Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(2), pages 1341-1352, February.
    7. Victor Fredrick & Vandu Umaru Lazarus & Ishaku Yahaya & Ibrahim Hyedma Bwala & Ajanson, Samuel Sule & Buhari Isa Uba, 2023. "Impact of Public Solid Waste Disposal Dump Sites: A Threat to Residence of Yelwa Tsakani, Bauchi," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(2), pages 507-522, February.
    8. Takunda Shabani & Steven Jerie & Timothy Vurayayi Mutekwa & Tapiwa Shabani, 2024. "Electronic Waste: 21st Century Scenario in Zimbabwe—A Review," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1269-1284, June.
    9. Vladimír Frišták & Diana Bošanská & Vladimír Turčan & Martin Pipíška & Christoph Pfeifer & Gerhard Soja, 2022. "Relevance of Pyrolysis Products Derived from Sewage Sludge for Soil Applications," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Anna Mazzi & Michela Sciarrone & Roberto Raga, 2022. "Environmental Performance of Semi-Aerobic Landfill by Means of Life Cycle Assessment Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Yijia Wang & Senwei Huang & Jia Liu, 2023. "Research on the Rural Environmental Governance and Interaction Effects of Farmers under the Perspective of Circular Economy—Evidence from Three Provinces of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Sabah Mariyam & Logan Cochrane & Shifa Zuhara & Gordon McKay, 2022. "Waste Management in Qatar: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations for System Strengthening," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    13. Mohd Faiz Ibrahim & Rozita Hod & Haidar Rizal Toha & Azmawati Mohammed Nawi & Idayu Badilla Idris & Hanizah Mohd Yusoff & Mazrura Sahani, 2021. "The Impacts of Illegal Toxic Waste Dumping on Children’s Health: A Review and Case Study from Pasir Gudang, Malaysia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Marco Bardus & May A. Massoud, 2022. "Predicting the Intention to Sort Waste at Home in Rural Communities in Lebanon: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Alessio Conti & Elena Viottini & Rosanna Irene Comoretto & Chiara Piovan & Barbara Martin & Beatrice Albanesi & Marco Clari & Valerio Dimonte & Sara Campagna, 2024. "The Effectiveness of Educational Interventions in Improving Waste Management Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.
    16. Sabbir Ahmed & Sameera Mubarak & Jia Tina Du & Santoso Wibowo, 2022. "Forecasting the Status of Municipal Waste in Smart Bins Using Deep Learning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Hang Yin & Yixiong Huang & Kuiming Wang, 2021. "How Do Environmental Concerns and Governance Performance Affect Public Environmental Participation: A Case Study of Waste Sorting in Urban China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-16, September.
    18. Saowanee Wijitkosum, 2023. "Repurposing Disposable Bamboo Chopsticks Waste as Biochar for Agronomical Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-16, January.
    19. Benett Siyabonga Madonsela & Machete Machete & Karabo Shale, 2024. "Indigenous Knowledge Systems of Solid Waste Management in Bushbuckridge Rural Communities, South Africa," Waste, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Emily Ying Yang Chan & Tiffany Sze Tung Sham & Tayyab Salim Shahzada & Caroline Dubois & Zhe Huang & Sida Liu & Kevin K.C. Hung & Shelly L.A. Tse & Kin On Kwok & Pui-Hong Chung & Ryoma Kayano & Rajib , 2020. "Narrative Review on Health-EDRM Primary Prevention Measures for Vector-Borne Diseases," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-28, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14603-:d:965189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.