IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14541-d964044.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wildlife Knowledge and Attitudes toward Hunting: A Comparative Hunter–Non-Hunter Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Georgia Raftogianni

    (Department of Forest and Natural Environment Sciences, International Hellenic University, P.O. Box 172, 66100 Drama, Greece)

  • Vasileios J. Kontsiotis

    (Department of Forest and Natural Environment Sciences, International Hellenic University, P.O. Box 172, 66100 Drama, Greece)

  • Vasilios Liordos

    (Department of Forest and Natural Environment Sciences, International Hellenic University, P.O. Box 172, 66100 Drama, Greece)

Abstract

Assessing the public’s attitudes toward hunting and knowledge about wildlife is critical for successfully managing and conserving resources. This need is further emphasized by the increase in urbanization, resulting in decreasing participation in outdoor activities, such as hunting. This study aimed at investigating the attitudes toward hunting and the wildlife knowledge of Greek residents and at understanding the variation among hunters and non-hunters. Respondents to on-site, face-to-face surveys ( n = 461; hunters, 146; non-hunters, 315) were asked to rate their acceptance of the motives for hunting and of hunting as a management tool and their knowledge about the ecology, biology, and behavior of wildlife. The hunters were highly motivated for hunting and supported it as a management tool. The non-hunters’ attitudes were, however, neutral to negative. The hunters had greater knowledge about wildlife species, both game and non-game, than the non-hunters. The more experienced hunters with greater knowledge about wildlife were generally more positive toward hunting. Older, male, non-hunters who have a greater knowledge about wildlife and who consume game meat and have hunters in the family or among their friends were generally more positive toward hunting. The findings suggested that hunting is a controversial social issue. Policies aimed at informing public groups about good hunting practices and at increasing the public’s engagement in outdoor activities would reduce such controversies, improve human health and well-being, and reinforce nature and wildlife stewardship and support for biodiversity conservation.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgia Raftogianni & Vasileios J. Kontsiotis & Vasilios Liordos, 2022. "Wildlife Knowledge and Attitudes toward Hunting: A Comparative Hunter–Non-Hunter Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14541-:d:964044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14541/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14541/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anke Fischer & Camilla Sandström & Miguel Delibes-Mateos & Beatriz Arroyo & Degu Tadie & Deborah Randall & Fetene Hailu & Asanterabi Lowassa & Maurus Msuha & Vesna Kereži & Slaven Reljić & John Linnel, 2013. "On the multifunctionality of hunting -- an institutional analysis of eight cases from Europe and Africa," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 531-552, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Živojinović, I. & Weiss, G. & Wilding, M. & Wong, J.L.G. & Ludvig, A., 2020. "Experiencing forest products – An innovation trend by rural entrepreneurs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    2. Ernst-August Nuppenau, 2018. "Eco-System Services in Agrarian Value Chains: Value Detection of Bio-Diversity as Public Good Provision, Problems, and Institutional Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Cláudio Bicho & Rui Machado & Russell Alpizar-Jara & Pedro Santos, 2024. "Planning for Deer-Hunting Management at the Local and Regional Scales: Reconciling Economic, Social and Ecological Functions," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Stryamets, Nataliya & Elbakidze, Marine & Chamberlain, James & Angelstam, Per, 2020. "Governance of non-wood forest products in Russia and Ukraine: Institutional rules, stakeholder arrangements, and decision-making processes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Bowditch, Euan A.D. & McMorran, Rob & Bryce, Rosalind & Smith, Melanie, 2019. "Perception and partnership: Developing forest resilience on private estates," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 110-122.
    6. Ratna C. Purwestri & Miroslav Hájek & Miroslava Šodková & Vilém Jarský, 2020. "How Are Wood and Non-Wood Forest Products Utilized in the Czech Republic? A Preliminary Assessment of a Nationwide Survey on the Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12, January.
    7. Eastwood, Antonia & Fischer, Anke & Hague, Alice & Brown, Katrina, 2022. "A cup of tea? – The role of social relationships, networks and learning in land managers’ adaptations to policy change," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Emily J. Potratz & Robert D. Holt & Joel S. Brown, 2024. "Ecology of Fear: Acclimation and Adaptations to Hunting by Humans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14541-:d:964044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.