IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p14193-d958711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling of Causes and Consequences of Human Error in Mining Processes Design: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Iraj Mohammadfam

    (Department of Ergonomic, Health in Emergency and Disaster Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Science, Tehran 1653787165, Iran)

  • Marc Bascompta

    (Department of Mining, Industrial and ICT Engineering, Polytechnic University of Catalonia, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

  • AliAsghar Khajevandi

    (Department of Occupational Health, Safety and Environment Management, Faculty of Health, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan 6517838736, Iran)

  • Hesam Dehghani

    (Department of Mining Engineering, Hamedan University of Technology, Hamadan 6516913418, Iran)

Abstract

Given the significant role of mining in sustainable development and its intrinsic characteristics, the hazards and potential consequences are a great concern for the industry. A design error is one of the main reasons behind accidents and environmental disasters. This study aims to identify and categorize effective factors influencing design errors and their health, safety, and environmental consequences. The study was carried out based on the theme analysis of 12 Iranian surface miners’ opinions from 14 October to 25 December 2021. The data were collected using semi-structured interviews. The data analysis procedure was conducted based on the Strauss Model using MAXQDA2022. In the open coding section, 120 and 146 primary codes were identified regarding causes and consequences, respectively. As for the codes for causes, 26 main categories and five subcategory codes were identified, including organizational, personal, environmental, occupational, and external factors. As for the identified codes for consequences, 11 subcategories and three main categories were identified, including safety, health, and environmental effects. The findings of the study revealed that among causes, the external factor ( p = 0.3703) had the weakest, and the personal factor ( p = 0.003) had the strongest correlations with human error in design. In line with the opinion of the expert participants, design error had significant relationships with safety ( p = 0.002), environmental ( p = 0.01), and health effects ( p = 0.034). The cause-consequence model introduced in this study can help many organizations, particularly surface mines, to provide a good basis for achieving sustainable safety, health management, and sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Iraj Mohammadfam & Marc Bascompta & AliAsghar Khajevandi & Hesam Dehghani, 2022. "Modeling of Causes and Consequences of Human Error in Mining Processes Design: A Qualitative Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14193-:d:958711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14193/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14193/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shabnam Vatanpour & Steve E. Hrudey & Irina Dinu, 2015. "Can Public Health Risk Assessment Using Risk Matrices Be Misleading?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Zhu, Andy Yunlong & von Zedtwitz, Max & Assimakopoulos, Dimitris & Fernandes, Kiran, 2016. "The impact of organizational culture on Concurrent Engineering, Design-for-Safety, and product safety performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 69-81.
    3. Rodrigo F. Herrera & Claudio Mourgues & Luis Fernando Alarcón & Eugenio Pellicer, 2019. "An Assessment of Lean Design Management Practices in Construction Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. David M. Clarke, 2003. "Review essay: Organizational accidents and human error," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 285-288, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessandro Capocchi & Paola Orlandini & Stefano Amelio, 2021. "Hospital risk management at the time of Covid-19: An analysis of the Lombardy Region," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(118), pages 97-116.
    2. F. Acebes & J. M. González-Varona & A. López-Paredes & J. Pajares, 2024. "Beyond probability-impact matrices in project risk management: A quantitative methodology for risk prioritisation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Ghafoori, Arman & Gupta, Manjul & Merhi, Mohammad I. & Gupta, Samrat & Shore, Adam P., 2024. "Toward the role of organizational culture in data-driven digital transformation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    4. Felipe Muñoz-La Rivera & Juan Carlos Vielma & Rodrigo F. Herrera & Elisa Gallardo, 2021. "Waste Identification in the Operation of Structural Engineering Companies (SEC) According to Lean Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:14193-:d:958711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.