IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13881-d953192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency Evaluation of a Forestry Green Economy under a Multi-Dimensional Output Benefit in China—Based on Evidential Reasoning and the Cross Efficiency Model

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Huang

    (College of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    School of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    The Collective Forestry Reform and Development Research Center of New Types of Think Tanks with Universities in Fujian, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Xiao He

    (College of Computer and Information Sciences, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    The Collective Forestry Reform and Development Research Center of New Types of Think Tanks with Universities in Fujian, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Shizhen He

    (School of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    The Collective Forestry Reform and Development Research Center of New Types of Think Tanks with Universities in Fujian, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Yongwu Dai

    (School of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
    The Collective Forestry Reform and Development Research Center of New Types of Think Tanks with Universities in Fujian, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

Abstract

The efficiency evaluation of forestry green economy development is related to the direction of forestry development and plays an important role in balancing the economic and environmental issues within that forestry development. The existing research faces three challenges: first, the output indicator is singular; second, the perspective of a self-assessment is extremely limited; and third, the multi perspective fusion method is not in line with the mechanism of the cross efficiency evaluation model. To address these challenges and the characteristics of forestry development output, we constructed multi-level output indicators from four aspects: ecology, economy, society, and sustainability and used evidence reasoning to combine the output indicators. Based on the perspective of a cross evaluation among peers, four different cross efficiency values are defined from the evaluation relationship between the different decision-making units to obtain economic–aggressive, social–neutral, ecological–benevolent, sustainable–neutral, and comprehensive–neutral cross efficiencies. According to the relationship between self- and cross evaluation, an order conditional entropy cross efficiency aggregation model has been proposed and used to analyze the development efficiency of the forestry green economy in 31 Chinese provinces in 2019. Considering the uneven distribution of the forestry resources in China, the development in the 31 provinces and cities is divided into four types by discussing the relationship between the output indicators and efficiency, while the reasons for the unbalanced development and the poor comprehensive development are discussed according to five cross efficiencies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Huang & Xiao He & Shizhen He & Yongwu Dai, 2022. "Efficiency Evaluation of a Forestry Green Economy under a Multi-Dimensional Output Benefit in China—Based on Evidential Reasoning and the Cross Efficiency Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13881-:d:953192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13881/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13881/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Feng & Ang, Sheng & Xia, Qiong & Yang, Chenchen, 2012. "Ranking DMUs by using interval DEA cross efficiency matrix with acceptability analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(2), pages 483-488.
    2. Yang, Jian-Bo, 2001. "Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 31-61, May.
    3. Lisa Reyes Mason & Colleen Cummings Melton & Darian Gray & Andrea L. Swallow, 2022. "Climate Change, Social Work, and the Transition Away from Fossil Fuels: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Chen, Lei & Wang, Ying-Ming, 2020. "DEA target setting approach within the cross efficiency framework," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    5. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Wang, Chih-Wei & Ho, Shan-Ju, 2022. "The dimension of green economy: Culture viewpoint," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 122-138.
    6. Yang, Guo-liang & Yang, Jian-bo & Liu, Wen-bin & Li, Xiao-xuan, 2013. "Cross-efficiency aggregation in DEA models using the evidential-reasoning approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 393-404.
    7. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    8. Kallio, A. Maarit I. & Hänninen, Riitta & Vainikainen, Nina & Luque, Sandra, 2008. "Biodiversity value and the optimal location of forest conservation sites in Southern Finland," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 232-243, September.
    9. Y M Wang & S Wang, 2013. "Approaches to determining the relative importance weights for cross-efficiency aggregation in data envelopment analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(1), pages 60-69, January.
    10. Markowski-Lindsay, Marla & Borsuk, Mark E. & Butler, Brett J. & Duveneck, Matthew J. & Holt, Jonathan & Kittredge, David B. & Laflower, Danelle & MacLean, Meghan Graham & Orwig, David & Thompson, Jona, 2020. "Compounding the Disturbance: Family Forest Owner Reactions to Invasive Forest Insects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng Li & Han Wu & Qingyuan Zhu & Liang Liang & Gang Kou, 2021. "Data envelopment analysis cross efficiency evaluation with reciprocal behaviors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 302(1), pages 173-210, July.
    2. Shiva Moslemi & Hamidreza Izadbakhsh & Marzieh Zarinbal, 2019. "A new reliable performance evaluation model: IFB-IER–DEA," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 56(1), pages 14-31, March.
    3. Hao Pan & Guo-liang Yang & Xiao-lei Chen & Yuan-yu Lou & Teng Wang & Zhong-cheng Guan, 2024. "Regret cross-efficiency evaluation using attitudinal entropy approach," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Ganji, S.S. & Dehghani, Alireza & Ajirlu, Shahrouz Fathi, 2024. "Evaluation of intercity road passenger transportation using a novel double-frontier game-regret-cross-efficiency," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    5. Davtalab-Olyaie, Mostafa & Asgharian, Masoud, 2021. "On Pareto-optimality in the cross-efficiency evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 247-257.
    6. Liu, Hui-hui & Song, Yao-yao & Liu, Xiao-xiao & Yang, Guo-liang, 2020. "Aggregating the DEA prospect cross-efficiency with an application to state key laboratories in China," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Oral, Muhittin & Oukil, Amar & Malouin, Jean-Louis & Kettani, Ossama, 2014. "The appreciative democratic voice of DEA: A case of faculty academic performance evaluation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 20-28.
    8. Yangxue Ning & Yan Zhang & Guoqiang Wang, 2023. "An Improved DEA Prospect Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method and Its Application in Fund Performance Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Kao, Chiang & Liu, Shiang-Tai, 2020. "A slacks-based measure model for calculating cross efficiency in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    10. R. Pelissari & M. C. Oliveira & S. Ben Amor & A. Kandakoglu & A. L. Helleno, 2020. "SMAA methods and their applications: a literature review and future research directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 433-493, October.
    11. Shiang-Tai Liu & Yueh-Chiang Lee, 2021. "Fuzzy measures for fuzzy cross efficiency in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 369-398, May.
    12. Fukuyama, Hirofumi & Matousek, Roman & Tzeremes, Nickolaos G., 2022. "Bank production with nonperforming loans: A minimum distance directional slack inefficiency approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    13. Yang, Jian-Bo & Wong, Brandon Y.H. & Xu, Dong-Ling & Stewart, Theodor J., 2009. "Integrating DEA-oriented performance assessment and target setting using interactive MOLP methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(1), pages 205-222, May.
    14. Chen, Kun & Song, Yao-yao & Pan, Jiao-feng & Yang, Guo-liang, 2020. "Measuring destocking performance of the Chinese real estate industry: A DEA-Malmquist approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    15. Merigó, José M. & Casanovas, Montserrat & Yang, Jian-Bo, 2014. "Group decision making with expertons and uncertain generalized probabilistic weighted aggregation operators," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 215-224.
    16. Cui, Yuan & Pan, Hao & Huang, Yi-Di & Yang, Guo-liang, 2024. "How can sociological theories provide legitimacy to eco-efficiency evaluations? Embark on a journey toward understanding," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    17. Klimberg, Ronald & Ratick, Samuel, 2023. "Benchmarking nursing homes using the Order Rated Effectiveness model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    18. Yinsheng Yang & Qianwei Zhuang & Guangdong Tian & Silin Wei, 2018. "A Management and Environmental Performance Evaluation of China’s Family Farms Using an Ultimate Comprehensive Cross-Efficiency Model (UCCE)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-25, December.
    19. Delimiro Visbal-Cadavid & Mónica Martínez-Gómez & Francisco Guijarro, 2017. "Assessing the Efficiency of Public Universities through DEA. A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Menghan Chen & Sheng Ang & Lijing Jiang & Feng Yang, 2020. "Centralized resource allocation based on cross-evaluation considering organizational objective and individual preferences," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(2), pages 529-565, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13881-:d:953192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.