IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i21p13738-d951224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Main Agro-Ecological Structure: An Index for Evaluating Agro-Biodiversity in Agro-Ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Ingrid Quintero

    (Programa Doctoral en Agroecología, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 30 # 45–03 Edificio 500, Bogota 111321, Colombia
    Instituto de Estudios Ambientales, Grupo de Estudios Ambientales Agrarios, Universidad Nacional de Colombia (IDEA/UN), Calle 44 # 45–67, Unidad Camilo Torres Bloque B2, Bogota 111321, Colombia)

  • Yesica Xiomara Daza-Cruz

    (Instituto de Estudios Ambientales, Grupo de Estudios Ambientales Agrarios, Universidad Nacional de Colombia (IDEA/UN), Calle 44 # 45–67, Unidad Camilo Torres Bloque B2, Bogota 111321, Colombia)

  • Tomás León-Sicard

    (Instituto de Estudios Ambientales, Grupo de Estudios Ambientales Agrarios, Universidad Nacional de Colombia (IDEA/UN), Calle 44 # 45–67, Unidad Camilo Torres Bloque B2, Bogota 111321, Colombia)

Abstract

The agro-biodiversity present in agro-ecosystems is fundamental in guaranteeing sustainability and resilience. However, there are very few approaches for evaluating it and, even less, ones that include indicators to analyze the influence of the structural and spatial configuration of a landscape in order to favor agro-biodiversity connectivity to productive systems. There are also no proposals that include management and conservation practices, and the producer (farmer)’s perceptions, awareness and ability to favor it on their farm. The Main Agro-ecological Structure (MAS) is a new proposed index to describe the agro-biodiversity of agro-ecosystems, including these topics and comprising 10 criteria and 29 indicators. Connection with the main ecological structure of the landscape (CMESL), extension of external connectors (EEC), diversity of external connectors (DEC), extension of internal connectors (EIC), diversity of internal connectors (DIC), land use (LU), management practices (PM), conservation practices (CP), perception, awareness and knowledge (PAK) and action capacity (AC) are the criteria that make up the index. Methodologies for its evaluation are also described, and a possibility of adapting certain indicators according to the ecological and cultural contexts where the farms are located is discussed. The possibility of relating agro-biodiversity, evaluated using the index, to other agro-system attributes or properties would allow for one to consider its importance in the multidimensional sustainability of farms, thought to be the greatest advantage for its application.

Suggested Citation

  • Ingrid Quintero & Yesica Xiomara Daza-Cruz & Tomás León-Sicard, 2022. "Main Agro-Ecological Structure: An Index for Evaluating Agro-Biodiversity in Agro-Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13738-:d:951224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13738/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/13738/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriel, Jose Luis & Quemada, Miguel & Martín-Lammerding, Diana & Vanclooster, Marnik, 2019. "Assessing the cover crop effect on soil hydraulic properties by inverse modelling in a 10-year field trial," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 62-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Morgado Marcelino & Pedro Dinis Gaspar & Arminda Paço & Tânia M. Lima & Ana Monteiro & José Carlos Franco & Erika S. Santos & Rebeca Campos & Carlos M. Lopes, 2024. "Decision Support System for the Assessment and Enhancement of Agrobiodiversity Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-18, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:21:p:13738-:d:951224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.