IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i1p544-d717808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Knowledge of Participants’ Outdoor and Indoor Physical Education Lessons as an Example of Implementing Sustainable Development Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Marcin Pasek

    (Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Elena Bendíková

    (Faculty of Arts, Matej Bel University, 974 01 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia)

  • Michalina Kuska

    (Institute of Physical Education, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Hanna Żukowska

    (Institute of Physical Education, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Remigiusz Dróżdż

    (Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Dariusz Jacek Olszewski-Strzyżowski

    (Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland)

  • Magdalena Zając

    (Department of Special Pedagogy and Speech Therapy, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

  • Mirosława Szark-Eckardt

    (Institute of Physical Education, Kazimierz Wielki University, 85-064 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

Abstract

(1) Background: The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of physical activity outdoors in nature as part of physical education in schools on the level of knowledge and ecological attitudes. (2) Material and methods: A total of 220 students took part in the study, with 103 of them in the treatment group, which usually practiced outdoor physical education classes, and 117 in the control group, which practiced mainly indoor. The project lasted 21 months, covering the last two years of primary school. The authors used the Children’s Environmental Attitude and Knowledge Scale CHEAKS in this study. The authors sought for an answer to the question of whether bringing a young person closer to nature by participating in a greater number of outdoor physical education lessons results in in-depth environmental knowledge. (3) Results: The appearance of seven statistically significant differences in ecological knowledge in the final study in favor of the group having outdoor physical education lessons proves the cognitively and visually stimulating role of a natural environment for physically active people. The location of physical education lessons turned out to be a much stronger condition for in-depth knowledge than gender, place of residence, parents’ education level, and subjective assessment of the financial satisfaction level. (4) Conclusion: These results are an incentive to further developing the young generation’s contact with nature through outdoor physical education lessons.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcin Pasek & Elena Bendíková & Michalina Kuska & Hanna Żukowska & Remigiusz Dróżdż & Dariusz Jacek Olszewski-Strzyżowski & Magdalena Zając & Mirosława Szark-Eckardt, 2022. "Environmental Knowledge of Participants’ Outdoor and Indoor Physical Education Lessons as an Example of Implementing Sustainable Development Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:544-:d:717808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/544/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/544/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alicja Balcerak & Jacek Woźniak, 2022. "Shaping Pro-Environmental Attitudes through Higher Education—A Preliminary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Branka Radulović & Milanka Džinović & Danimir Mandić & Mirsada Zukorlić & Gorana Starijaš, 2023. "Outdoor Science Approach with Peer Tutoring at University Level as an Example of Implementing Sustainable Development Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-13, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:544-:d:717808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.