IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i1p531-d717496.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Impact on Corporate Risk-Taking? Evidence from Emerging Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao Li

    (Systems and Industrial Engineering Technology Research Center, Zhongyuan University of Technology, Zhengzhou 451191, China)

  • Gang Liu

    (Hubei Enterprise Culture Research Center, Hubei University of Economics, Wuhan 430205, China)

  • Qinghua Fu

    (Department of Business Administration, Moutai Institute, Renhuai 564507, China)

  • Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman

    (College of Business Administration, Kingdom University, Riffa 40434, Bahrain)

  • Abdelrhman Meero

    (College of Business Administration, Kingdom University, Riffa 40434, Bahrain)

  • Muhammad Safdar Sial

    (Department of Management Sciences, COMSATS University Islamabad (CUI), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan)

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) fulfillment on corporate risk-taking to assist stakeholders in identifying the “double-edged sword” role of CSR activities and provide empirical evidence for enterprises to properly carry out CSR activities. The results show that the self-interest instrumentalization of CSR activities intensifies agency conflict, and CSR fulfillment weakens risk-taking to a certain extent. When CSR fulfillment reaches a certain value, CSR activities can improve risk-taking. Then, CSR fulfillment and risk-taking show a U-shaped relationship. Further analysis shows that the impacts of CSR on debt financing and R&D input reflect the U-shaped effect pathways of CSR fulfillment on risk-taking. Finally, it is suggested that CSR activities should be avoided to become the “self-interest tool” of the management. The regulators guide enterprises to break through the inflection point of the U-shaped effect and consider more for the stakeholders’ overall interests. Additionally, the regulators establish an effective compensation system to ensure that the enterprises with adequate CSR fulfillment obtain high-quality capital resources and promote the sustainable development of the capital market.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao Li & Gang Liu & Qinghua Fu & Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahman & Abdelrhman Meero & Muhammad Safdar Sial, 2022. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Impact on Corporate Risk-Taking? Evidence from Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:531-:d:717496
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/531/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/531/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Abad & M. Fuensanta Cutillas-Gomariz & Juan Pedro Sánchez-Ballesta & José Yagüe, 2018. "Real Earnings Management and Information Asymmetry in the Equity Market," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 209-235, March.
    2. Ming-Chuan Chen & Chen-Fu Lee & Chien-Ming Huang, 2016. "The Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Equity Fund Returns: Evidence from China," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(10), pages 92-102, October.
    3. Nguyen, Pascal, 2011. "Corporate governance and risk-taking: Evidence from Japanese firms," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 278-297, June.
    4. Chia-Ling Cheng & Fan-Hua Kung, 2016. "The effects of mandatory corporate social responsibility policy on accounting conservatism," Review of Accounting and Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(1), pages 2-20, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Xiaoqian & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier & Zhao, Shikuan & Wang, Long, 2024. "The impact of government environmental attention on firms’ ESG performance: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    2. Qian Wang & Huiru Chen & Yajiong Xue & Huigang Liang, 2022. "How Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Firm Performance: The Inverted-U Shape Contingent on Founder CEO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Xiaodong Teng & Kun-Shan Wu & Lopin Kuo & Bao-Guang Chang, 2023. "Investigating the double-edged sword effect of environmental, social and governance practices on corporate risk-taking in the high-tech industry," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(2), pages 511-549, June.
    4. Guo, Chunying & Yang, Baochen & Fan, Ying, 2022. "Does mandatory CSR disclosure improve stock price informativeness? Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Haifei Wang & Hongjun Wu & Peter Humphreys, 2022. "Chinese Merchant Group Culture, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Cost of Debt: Evidence from Private Listed Firms in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Mbanyele, William & Muchenje, Linda T, 2022. "The dark side of weakening shareholder litigation rights: Evidence from green patenting activities," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anagnostopoulou, Seraina C. & Tsekrekos, Andrianos E. & Voulgaris, Georgios, 2021. "Accounting conservatism and corporate social responsibility," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    2. Díez-Esteban, José María & Farinha, Jorge Bento & García-Gómez, Conrado Diego, 2016. "The role of institutional investors in propagating the 2007 financial crisis in Southern Europe," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 439-454.
    3. Xiaodong Teng & Kun-Shan Wu & Lopin Kuo & Bao-Guang Chang, 2023. "Investigating the double-edged sword effect of environmental, social and governance practices on corporate risk-taking in the high-tech industry," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(2), pages 511-549, June.
    4. Nam Hoai Tran & Chi Dat Le & David McMillan, 2020. "Ownership concentration, corporate risk-taking and performance: Evidence from Vietnamese listed firms," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 1732640-173, January.
    5. Huiping Zhu & Haifeng Gu & Habiba Halepoto, 2022. "Can Fulfillment of Social Responsibility Enable Enterprises to Innovate? The Role of Corporate Financialization and Agency Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    6. Wang, Jie & Wang, Wanwan & Yuan, Fang, 2023. "Air pollution and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 570-586.
    7. Randall Morck & Bernard Yeung & Wayne Yu, 2013. "R-squared and the Economy," NBER Working Papers 19017, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Oliver Lukason & María-del-Mar Camacho-Miñano, 2020. "Corporate Governance Characteristics of Private SMEs’ Annual Report Submission Violations," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Si, Deng-Kui & Li, Xiao-Lin, 2022. "Shadow banking business and firm risk-taking: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Jifan Hu & Yeyao Tang & Na Yin & Xiang Guo, 2024. "Institutional Investor Information Competition and Accounting Information Transparency: Implications for Financial Markets and Corporate Governance in China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9629-9666, June.
    11. Le, Anh-Tuan & Doan, Anh-Tuan, 2020. "Corruption and financial fragility of small and medium enterprises: International evidence," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 57.
    12. Luis Otero-González & Luis-Ignacio Rodríguez-Gil & Milagros Vivel-Búa & Aracely Tamayo-Herrera, 2022. "Family Ownership, Corporate Governance and Risk-Taking," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.
    13. Garanina, Tatiana & Kim, Oksana, 2023. "The relationship between CSR disclosure and accounting conservatism: The role of state ownership," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    14. Jayaram, Jayanth & Dixit, Mita & Motwani, Jaideep, 2014. "Supply chain management capability of small and medium sized family businesses in India: A multiple case study approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 472-485.
    15. Pathak, Rajesh & Gupta, Ranjan Das, 2022. "Environmental, social and governance performance and earnings management – The moderating role of law code and creditor's rights," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(PA).
    16. Aryestantya Fikri Dewanta & Johan Arifin, 2020. "Corporate Risk-Taking Behaviour: Corporate Governance Perspective," Journal of Contemporary Accounting, Master in Accounting Program, Faculty of Business & Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, vol. 2(1), pages 1, May.
    17. Xu, Weidong & Gao, Xin & Xu, Hao & Li, Donghui, 2022. "Does global climate risk encourage companies to take more risks?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    18. Kumari Ranjita & Kumar Nishant, 2020. "Ownership Structure and the Risk: Analysis of Indian Firms," Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 39-52, October.
    19. Vural-Yavaş, Çiğdem, 2020. "Corporate risk-taking in developed countries: The influence of economic policy uncertainty and macroeconomic conditions," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    20. Dorra Ellouze & Khadija Mnasri, 2019. "Risk-taking behaviour of family firms: evidence from Tunisia," Post-Print hal-02999642, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:531-:d:717496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.