IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12894-d937492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of the Internet on Regional Economic Development—An Empirical Study Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Wang

    (International Business School, Shandong Jiaotong University, Weihai 264209, China)

  • Youyu Dai

    (International Business School, Shandong Jiaotong University, Weihai 264209, China
    Chinese International College, Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok 10210, Thailand)

  • Zhengyin Wang

    (International Business School, Shandong Jiaotong University, Weihai 264209, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of the digital economy, the level of Internet development has become increasingly important to the national economy. The development and application of the Internet have brought new impetus to economic development. At present, China’s economic growth is slowing down. Finding new support points to maintain high-quality economic growth has become the focus of current research. Therefore, at the moment of Internet economic development, it is of great significance to study whether the Internet development level can promote economic development, how to promote economic development and the size of its influence on economic development. Based on this, this paper constructs an indicator system for evaluating the Internet development level from four dimensions: Internet popularization level, information infrastructure development level, scientific and cultural development level, and industrial development and application level. With the Internet development level as the core explanatory variable, this paper establishes a fixed effect model based on the Hausman test by analyzing China’s provincial panel data from 2010 to 2019. The research results show that the Internet development level in all regions of China has risen from 2010 to 2019. The Internet development level has a promoting effect on economic growth, and there are regional differences. The promoting effect on the eastern region is higher than that in the central and western regions. The Internet development level has a significantly higher role in promoting the per capital GDP in the eastern region than in the central and western regions. It is expected to provide valuable ideas for the government to fully harness the role of the Internet in promoting economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Wang & Youyu Dai & Zhengyin Wang, 2022. "The Influence of the Internet on Regional Economic Development—An Empirical Study Based on China’s Provincial Panel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12894-:d:937492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12894/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12894/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shao, Benjamin B.M. & Lin, Winston T., 2016. "Assessing output performance of information technology service industries: Productivity, innovation and catch-up," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 43-53.
    2. Hrushikesh Mallick, 2014. "Role of technological infrastructures in exports: evidence from a cross-country analysis," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 669-694, September.
    3. Schleife, Katrin, 2010. "What really matters: Regional versus individual determinants of the digital divide in Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 173-185, February.
    4. repec:kap:iaecre:v:17:y:2011:i:1:p:28-44 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Martha Jim鮥z & Jaime Arturo Matus & Miguel Angel Mart󹑺, 2014. "Economic growth as a function of human capital, internet and work," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(26), pages 3202-3210, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Domenica Lavorato & Palmira Piedepalumbo, 2023. "How Smart Technologies Affect the Decision-Making and Control System of Food and Beverage Companies—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Ventura, Eva & Satorra, Albert, 2015. "A multiple indicator model for panel data: an application to ICT area-level variation," 26th European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2015 127191, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    3. Margarita Billon & Rocio Marco & Fernando Lera-Lopez, 2017. "Innovation and ICT use in the EU: an analysis of regional drivers," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1083-1108, November.
    4. Bing Li & Linyue Li & Rou Li & Yunsong Yue, 2023. "Internet and firms’ exports and imports: Firm level evidence from China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 835-872, March.
    5. Nakano, Satoshi & Washizu, Ayu, 2018. "Induced effects of smart food/agri-systems in Japan: Towards a structural analysis of information technology," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(10), pages 824-835.
    6. Mathilde Aubouin, 2023. "Determinants of the Digital Divide: Evidence from France," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 151, pages 37-80.
    7. Yang Liu & Yanlin Yang & Huihui Li & Kaiyang Zhong, 2022. "Digital Economy Development, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China’s Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-23, February.
    8. Zhiguang ZHANG & Haiqing HU & Winston T. LIN, 2019. "Analyzing the Impacts of Unobserved National Characteristics on Economic Performance of Information Technology based on a Partial Adjustment Approach With Dynamic and Variable Speed of Adjustment," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(1), pages 128-142, March.
    9. Junjun Tang & Xing Zhao, 2023. "Does the new digital infrastructure improve total factor productivity?," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(4), pages 895-916, October.
    10. Martin Quinn & Miguel Godinho de Matos & Christian Peukert, 2022. "The Welfare Effects of Mobile Internet Access - Evidence from Roam-Like-at-Home," CESifo Working Paper Series 9612, CESifo.
    11. Hong, Jinhyun & Thakuriah, Piyushimita Vonu, 2018. "Examining the relationship between different urbanization settings, smartphone use to access the Internet and trip frequencies," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 11-18.
    12. Visser, Robin, 2019. "The effect of the internet on the margins of trade," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 41-54.
    13. Wei Zhang & Siqi Zhao & Xiaoyu Wan & Yuan Yao, 2021. "Study on the effect of digital economy on high-quality economic development in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-27, September.
    14. Gao, Yanyan & Zang, Leizhen & Sun, Jun, 2018. "Does computer penetration increase farmers’ income? An empirical study from China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 345-360.
    15. Graziella Bonanno & Annalisa Ferrando & Stefania Patrizia Sonia Rossi, 2023. "Do innovation and financial constraints affect the profit efficiency of European enterprises?," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 13(1), pages 57-86, March.
    16. Jyoti Choudrie & Efpraxia Zamani & Chike Obuekwe, 2022. "Bridging the Digital Divide in Ethnic Minority Older Adults: an Organisational Qualitative Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1355-1375, August.
    17. Chia-Nan Wang & Thanh-Tuan Dang & Ngoc-Ai-Thy Nguyen & Thi-Thu-Hong Le, 2020. "Supporting Better Decision-Making: A Combined Grey Model and Data Envelopment Analysis for Efficiency Evaluation in E-Commerce Marketplaces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-24, December.
    18. Thonipara, Anita & Sternberg, Rolf G. & Proeger, Till & Haefner, Lukas, 2020. "Assessing the Digital Divide and its Regional Determinants: Evidence from a Web-Scraping Analysis," ifh Working Papers 25/2020, Volkswirtschaftliches Institut für Mittelstand und Handwerk an der Universität Göttingen (ifh), revised 2020.
    19. Arianna Petrosino & Daniela Mancini & Stefano Garzella & Rita Lamboglia, 2018. "La Business Intelligence e la Business Analytics nell?era dei Big Data: una analisi della letteratura," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(3), pages 31-58.
    20. Charmine Sheena Saflor & Klint Allen Mariñas & Princess Alvarado & Anelyn Baleña & Monica Shane Tanglao & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Jazmin Tangsoc & Ezekiel Bernardo, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Internet Service Provision: Analyzing Consumer Preferences through a Hybrid TOPSIS–SEM–Neural Network Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-31, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12894-:d:937492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.