IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12378-d928657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Street Tree Height on PM2.5 Concentration in Street Canyons: A Simulation Study

Author

Listed:
  • Junyou Liu

    (School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Bohong Zheng

    (School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Yanfen Xiang

    (School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Jia Fan

    (School of Architecture and Art, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

With the rapid development of cities and the rapid increase in automobile ownership, traffic has become one of the main sources of PM2.5 pollution, which can be reduced by road greening through sedimentation, blocking, adhesion, and absorption. Using the method of combining field monitoring and ENVI-met simulation, the influence of the tree height on the PM2.5 concentration on both sides of the city streets was discussed. The influence of tree height on PM2.5 under five conditions was analyzed, including 10 m tall trees (i), 15 m tall trees (ii), alternating distribution of 15 and 10 m tall trees (iii), 5 m tall trees (iv), no trees on either side of the road (v). The results show that: Roadside trees can increase the concentration of PM2.5 in the narrow space of street canyons. However, without roadside trees, PM2.5 from traffic sources is not reduced in time, it is more easily spread to the distance. When the height of the roadside trees is 5 m and their crown widths are smaller than those of other trees, there is a relatively wide space between them. Compared with the higher roadside tree models with larger crown widths, the concentration of PM2.5 on the roadway and the downwind sidewalk is relatively low. In the three models (i–iii) with tree height above or equal to 10 m, the PM2.5 concentration around the trees do not show regular change with the change in tree height. Due to the tree height of 10 and 15 m, the crown width is large enough, and the alternate distribution of tree height of 15 and 10 m fails to make the PM2.5 concentration in the models lower than the models with tree height of 15 m or 10 m. The reasonable height of roadside trees in street canyons helps improve the wind circulation to promote the diffusion of PM2.5 pollution. There is no optimal height of roadside trees for PM2.5 pollution in street canyons, thus it is necessary to select the height reasonably according to the specific situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Junyou Liu & Bohong Zheng & Yanfen Xiang & Jia Fan, 2022. "The Impact of Street Tree Height on PM2.5 Concentration in Street Canyons: A Simulation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12378-:d:928657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12378/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Binghui Yang & Ye Chen, 2021. "PM2.5 Pollutant Concentrations in Greenspaces of Nanjing Are High but Can Be Lowered with Environmental Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-20, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youngsun Seok & Hyosook Yim & Taehyeon Moon & Jinhyung Chon, 2022. "Street Tree Planning to Improve Public Health and Ecosystem Resilience in Urban Areas: A Scenario Analysis Using a System Dynamics Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-19, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12378-:d:928657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.