IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12215-d925936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eucalyptus Growth Responses to Soil Water Storage Capacity in Arenosols and Acrisols Soils: Wood and Biomass Stock Modelling

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Pierre Cavalli

    (Soils Department, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil)

  • Elias Frank de Araújo

    (CMPC Celulose Riograndense, R. São Geraldo, 1680-Ermo, Guaiba 92703-470, Brazil)

  • José Miguel Reichert

    (Soils Department, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil)

Abstract

Eucalyptus is the main fast-growing tree for biomass production in the tropics, providing resources for pulp and paper industries and bioenergy. The potential productivity of forest sites over an eight-year rotation in Brazil was evaluated by the Physiological Principles in Predicting Growth (3-PG) model for two soils, Acrisols and Arenosols, with high and low water storage, respectively, and distinct productive potential capacity. The model was parameterized by data-sets obtained in bimonthly forest inventories performed in stands with 33, 58 and 89 months-old trees, and edaphic surveys. The average volumetric productivity of wood and biomass of the main stem determined at the 89 months-old stand was 374 m 3 ha −1 (177 Mg ha −1 ) for Acrisols and 272.3 m 3 ha −1 (130.0 Mg ha −1 ) for Arenosols. The estimated volumetric production in the Arenosols had a high mean annual increment up to the age of 58 months, with a significant reduction in growth rates after this time. In Acrisols, high incremental rates in wood volume up to age of 89 months (MAI VW > 50 m 3 ha −1 year −1 ) indicate that, under ideal soil conditions, the cutting cycle may exceed 8 years with no productivity impairment. The parameterized model matched well for forest yield (r 2 > 0.9) and dendrometric variables (r 2 > 0.78). The expected results of lower productivity in Arenosols occurred only after 58 months, while for Acrisols productivity remained high up to 89 months. The results showed the eucalyptus cycle should be shorter in Arenosols, since the lower cutting cycle can provide higher final productivity, when using the mean annual increment to evaluate productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Pierre Cavalli & Elias Frank de Araújo & José Miguel Reichert, 2022. "Eucalyptus Growth Responses to Soil Water Storage Capacity in Arenosols and Acrisols Soils: Wood and Biomass Stock Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12215-:d:925936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12215/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12215/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Meifang & Xiang, Wenhua & Deng, Xiangwen & Tian, Dalun & Huang, Zhihong & Zhou, Xiaolu & Yu, Guirui & He, Honglin & Peng, Changhui, 2013. "Application of TRIPLEX model for predicting Cunninghamia lanceolata and Pinus massoniana forest stand production in Hunan Province, southern China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 58-71.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucas Contarato Pilon & Jordano Vaz Ambus & Elena Blume & Rodrigo Josemar Seminoti Jacques & José Miguel Reichert, 2023. "Citrus Orchards in Agroforestry, Organic, and Conventional Systems: Soil Quality and Functioning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-28, August.
    2. Karuppanan Ramasamy Ramesh & Harshavardhan Krishnarao Deshmukh & Karthikeyan Sivakumar & Vipan Guleria & Rathod Digvijaysinh Umedsinh & Nathakrishnan Krishnakumar & Alagesan Thangamalar & Kathirvel Su, 2023. "Influence of Eucalyptus Agroforestry on Crop Yields, Soil Properties, and System Economics in Southern Regions of India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12215-:d:925936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.