IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12041-d923309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hybrid Wavelet Scattering Network-Based Model for Failure Identification of Reinforced Concrete Members

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Sadegh Barkhordari

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran 1591634311, Iran)

  • Mohammad Mahdi Barkhordari

    (School of Medicin, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman 7616914115, Iran)

  • Danial Jahed Armaghani

    (Department of Urban Planning, Engineering Networks and Systems, Institute of Architecture and Construction, South Ural State University, 76, Lenin Prospect, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia)

  • Ahmad Safuan A. Rashid

    (School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia)

  • Dmitrii Vladimirovich Ulrikh

    (Department of Urban Planning, Engineering Networks and Systems, Institute of Architecture and Construction, South Ural State University, 76, Lenin Prospect, 454080 Chelyabinsk, Russia)

Abstract

After earthquakes, qualified inspectors typically conduct a semisystematic information gathering, physical inspection, and visual examination of the nation’s public facilities, buildings, and structures. Manual examinations, however, take a lot of time and frequently demand too much work. In addition, there are not enough professionals qualified to assess such structural damage. As a result, in this paper, the efficiency of computer-vision hybrid models was investigated for automatically detecting damage to reinforced concrete elements. Data-driven hybrid models are generated by combining wavelet scattering network (WSN) with bagged trees (BT), random subspace ensembles (RSE), artificial neural networks (ANN), and quadratic support vector machines (SVM), named “BT-WSN”, “RSE-WSN”, “ANN-WSN”, and “SVM-WSN”. The hybrid models were trained on an image database containing 4585 images. In total, 15% of images with different sorts of damage were used to test the trained models’ robustness and adaptability; these images were not utilized in the training or validation phase. The WSN-SVM algorithm performed best in classifying the damage. It had the highest accuracy of the hybrid models, with a value of 99.1% in the testing phase.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Sadegh Barkhordari & Mohammad Mahdi Barkhordari & Danial Jahed Armaghani & Ahmad Safuan A. Rashid & Dmitrii Vladimirovich Ulrikh, 2022. "Hybrid Wavelet Scattering Network-Based Model for Failure Identification of Reinforced Concrete Members," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12041-:d:923309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12041/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12041/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abdollahi, Azam & Amini, Ali & Hariri-Ardebili, Mohammad Amin, 2022. "An uncertainty-aware dynamic shape optimization framework: Gravity dam design," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shirgir, Sina & Shamsaddinlou, Amir & Zare, Reza Najafi & Zehtabiyan, Sorour & Bonab, Masoud Hajialilue, 2023. "An efficient double-loop reliability-based optimization with metaheuristic algorithms to design soil nail walls under uncertain condition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. D'Urso, Diego & Chiacchio, Ferdinando & Cavalieri, Salvatore & Gambadoro, Salvatore & Khodayee, Soheyl Moheb, 2024. "Predictive maintenance of standalone steel industrial components powered by a dynamic reliability digital twin model with artificial intelligence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12041-:d:923309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.