IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p11988-d922558.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA) Checklists for Off-Site Construction (OSC) Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Seoyoung Jung

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, Korea)

  • Jungho Yu

    (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kwangwoon University, Seoul 01897, Korea)

Abstract

Off-Site Construction (OSC), which has the advantage of improving construction productivity, is being spotlighted as a solution to the limitations of conventional construction production methods. Despite the need for, and various advantages of, the introduction and utilization of OSC, however, several issues remain, such as design errors and reduction in design completeness, due to the lack of experience and expertise of project participants, as well as improper consideration of production environment and technical constraints. To resolve these issues, it is necessary to develop an optimal design plan that conforms to the OSC manufacturing environment and manufacturing efficiency; thus, there have been ongoing efforts in the construction industry to introduce Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA), to derive the optimal design plans for OSC projects. Some studies related to the application of DfMA to OSC have been conducted, however they neglected to present a checklist for reviewing the optimality of OSC design plans. This study has therefore developed an OSC–DfMA checklist, to review the optimality of design plans for OSC projects, by listing optimal design goals for OSC projects, the OSC process, and DfMA principles. This study utilized the systematic literature review, structured interview, and content validity analysis methods to develop the OSC–DfMA checklist presented herein. The developed OSC–DfMA checklist will be applicable to reviewing the optimality of the OSC design plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Seoyoung Jung & Jungho Yu, 2022. "Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA) Checklists for Off-Site Construction (OSC) Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11988-:d:922558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11988/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11988/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ke Chen & Weisheng Lu, 2018. "Design for Manufacture and Assembly Oriented Design Approach to a Curtain Wall System: A Case Study of a Commercial Building in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Craig Langston & Weiwei Zhang, 2021. "DfMA: Towards an Integrated Strategy for a More Productive and Sustainable Construction Industry in Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    2. Hosang Hyun & Hyung-Geun Kim & Jin-Sung Kim, 2022. "Integrated Off-Site Construction Design Process including DfMA Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Rabia Charef, 2022. "Is Circular Economy for the Built Environment a Myth or a Real Opportunity?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-5, December.
    4. Zhenmin Yuan & Guodong Ni & Linxiu Wang & Yaning Qiao & Chengshuang Sun & Na Xu & Wenshun Wang, 2020. "Research on the Barrier Analysis and Strength Measurement of a Prefabricated Building Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Dariel López-López & Antonio Serrano-Jiménez & Juan Gavilanes & Ferran Ventura-Blanch & Ángela Barrios-Padura & Carmen Díaz-López, 2023. "A Study on the Parametric Design Parameters That Influence Environmental Ergonomics and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-30, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11988-:d:922558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.