IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p11962-d921906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic Response Analysis on Stress and Displacement of the Shield Tunnel Structure and Soil Layer under Train-Induced Vibration in Xiamen Metro Line 6

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaqi Guo

    (School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China)

  • Lexin Xu

    (School of Civil Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo 454000, China)

  • Chong Xu

    (China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710043, China)

  • Ruimin Chen

    (Zhongtian Construction Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310002, China)

  • Jinhai Lin

    (China Railway First Survey and Design Institute Group Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710043, China)

Abstract

Tunnel engineering develops rapidly. To study the dynamic response of shield tunnel structure and its bottom soil layer caused by metro train operation, a three-dimensional finite-difference dynamic calculation method is used to establish a shield tunnel-soil layer coupling model based on the shield tunnel project of Maluan Central Station-Jimei Island Station of Xiamen Metro Line 6, and the dynamic response of tunnel structure and its bottom soil layer caused by metro train operation is calculated. The results show that: Under the action of train-induced vibration, the shield tunnel structure mainly bears compressive stress and generates compressive deformation. The dynamic response of tunnel structure represents a significant increasing trend with the enhancement of train-induced vibration load. Under the same load strength, dynamic response change amplitude of structure is not obvious with tunnel structural stiffness, stress is gradually increasing, and displacement is weakening. The deeper the soil depth at the bottom of the shield tunnel structure, the weaker the dynamic response of the soil layer. The stress response of the soil layer at the same depth is increasing with the train-induced vibration load improving, but the displacement response has a stage characteristic. The dynamic response of the soil layer at the same depth does not change obviously with the increase in shield tunnel structural stiffness, but the stress response gradually increases, and the displacement response becomes weak. In general, investigation of the dynamic response of the subway shield tunnel under train-induced vibration has important practical significance for maintaining the long-term safe operation of subway tunnels.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaqi Guo & Lexin Xu & Chong Xu & Ruimin Chen & Jinhai Lin, 2022. "Dynamic Response Analysis on Stress and Displacement of the Shield Tunnel Structure and Soil Layer under Train-Induced Vibration in Xiamen Metro Line 6," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11962-:d:921906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11962/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/11962/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mengxi Zhang & Xiaoqing Zhang & Lei Li & Chengyu Hong, 2018. "Experimental study on dynamic response of model shield tunnel induced by moving-axle loads of subway train," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 14(10), pages 15501477188, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Changchang Li & Zhengzhong Wang & Quanhong Liu, 2022. "Numerical Simulation of Mudstone Shield Tunnel Excavation with ABAQUS Seepage–Stress Coupling: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:11962-:d:921906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.