IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11782-d919167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Virtual Carbon Flow in China’s Capital Economic Circle: A Multi-Regional Input–Output Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Chong Yin

    (Institute of Science and Technology for Development of Shandong, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China)

  • Yue Liu

    (Institute of Science and Technology for Development of Shandong, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China)

  • Yingxin Cui

    (Institute of Science and Technology for Development of Shandong, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250014, China)

Abstract

The Capital Economic Circle (CEC) is the area with the largest economic aggregate in northern China and has a strong status in driving the economic development of China. However, the industrial structure dominated by high energy consuming industries leads to a large number of carbon dioxide emissions, and the imbalance between economic development and carbon emissions in CEC is serious; therefore, it is necessary to explore how to solve the carbon imbalance problem of the CEC by relying on interregional cooperation. Based on China’s multi-regional input–output tables of 2012, 2015 and 2017, this paper proposes the CEC carbon-extended, multi-regional input–output model to measure virtual carbon flow and analyze how the industrial structure leads to the imbalance of carbon flow distribution in CEC. Indicators such as direct carbon emission coefficients, complete carbon emission coefficients and carbon emissions pull coefficients of the industrial sectors in CEC are calculated and the physical carbon emission and virtual carbon flows among the industrial sectors and the regions are evaluated. The results show that there are potential constraints from the uncoordinated configuration of industrial innovation chains among the CEC, and the “carbon imbalance” of CEC is mainly reflected in the backward production technology of Hebei and its inefficient connection with the industrial innovation chain of Beijing and Tianjin. It is suggested that policymakers should promote the low-carbon production system and strengthen green energy development and utilization to enhance green development in CEC. In future research, we should pay attention to the updating method of the input–output table and the development of carbon circular networks. This study has implications for some areas of China and developing countries in Asia, which also have an imbalance between industrial economy development and carbon emissions, and a similarity in space structure and industry layout with CEC.

Suggested Citation

  • Chong Yin & Yue Liu & Yingxin Cui, 2022. "Virtual Carbon Flow in China’s Capital Economic Circle: A Multi-Regional Input–Output Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11782-:d:919167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11782/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11782/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Huaping & Edziah, Bless Kofi & Kporsu, Anthony Kwaku & Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad, 2021. "Energy efficiency: The role of technological innovation and knowledge spillover," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Majeed, Abdul & Wang, Lijun & Zhang, Xiaohui & Muniba, & Kirikkaleli, Dervis, 2021. "Modeling the dynamic links among natural resources, economic globalization, disaggregated energy consumption, and environmental quality: Fresh evidence from GCC economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. Rosa Duarte & Vicente Pinilla & Ana Serrano, 2018. "Factors driving embodied carbon in international trade: a multiregional input–output gravity model," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 545-566, October.
    4. Anne Margaret Lee, 2005. "A study in time," Nature, Nature, vol. 436(7049), pages 438-438, July.
    5. Hehua Zhao & Hongwen Chen & Lei He, 2022. "Embodied Carbon Emissions and Regional Transfer Characteristics—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    6. Wu Xiaoman & Abdul Majeed & Dinara G. Vasbieva & Claire Emilienne Wati Yameogo & Nazim Hussain, 2021. "Natural resources abundance, economic globalization, and carbon emissions: Advancing sustainable development agenda," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 1037-1048, September.
    7. Xu, Xiaomin & Niu, Dongxiao & Xiao, Bowen & Guo, Xiaodan & Zhang, Lihui & Wang, Keke, 2020. "Policy analysis for grid parity of wind power generation in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    8. Brizga, Janis & Feng, Kuishuang & Hubacek, Klaus, 2017. "Household carbon footprints in the Baltic States: A global multi-regional input–output analysis from 1995 to 2011," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 780-788.
    9. Shan, Yuli & Liu, Jianghua & Liu, Zhu & Xu, Xinwanghao & Shao, Shuai & Wang, Peng & Guan, Dabo, 2016. "New provincial CO2 emission inventories in China based on apparent energy consumption data and updated emission factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 742-750.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aladejare, Samson Adeniyi, 2022. "Natural resource rents, globalisation and environmental degradation: New insight from 5 richest African economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Xu, Haitao & Yang, Chengying & Li, Xuetao & Liu, Ruiyu & Zhang, Yonghong, 2024. "How do fintech, digitalization, green technologies influence sustainable environment in CIVETS nations? An evidence from CUP FM and CUP BC approaches," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Yang, Bin & Wu, Qiong & Sharif, Arshian & Uddin, Gazi Salah, 2023. "Non-linear impact of natural resources, green financing, and energy transition on sustainable environment: A way out for common prosperity in NORDIC countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    4. Duan, Cuncun & Chen, Bin & Feng, Kuishuang & Liu, Zhu & Hayat, Tasawar & Alsaedi, Ahmed & Ahmad, Bashir, 2018. "Interregional carbon flows of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C), pages 342-352.
    5. Li, Xiangrong & Zhu, Shaoying & Li, Yanyong & Chang, Ronghua, 2022. "What is the asymmetric influence of natural resource rent and green innovation on the ecological sustainability of the ARCTIC region," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    6. Ongo Nkoa, Bruno Emmanuel & Song, Jacques Simon & Minkoue Bikoula, Brice, 2024. "Natural resource rents in developing countries: Is the positive influence on the fragilities real?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    7. Hehua Zhao & Hongwen Chen & Ying Fang & Apei Song, 2022. "Transfer Characteristics of Embodied Carbon Emissions in Export Trade—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Wu Xie & Shuai Hu & Fangyi Li & Xin Cao & Zhipeng Tang, 2020. "Carbon and Water Footprints of Tibet: Spatial Pattern and Trend Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    9. Ahmad, Munir & Wu, Yiyun, 2022. "Natural resources, technological progress, and ecological efficiency: Does financial deepening matter for G-20 economies?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    10. Abdul Majeed & Juan Wang & Yewang Zhou & Muniba, 2024. "The Symmetric Effect of Financial Development, Human Capital and Urbanization on Ecological Footprint: Insights from BRICST Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-25, June.
    11. Tran, Trung Kien & Lin, Chia-Yang & Tu, Yu-Te & Duong, Nam Tien & Pham Thi, Thuy Dung & Shoh-Jakhon, Khamdamov, 2023. "Nexus between natural resource depletion and rent and COP26 commitments: Empirical evidence from Vietnam," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    12. Wen, Wen & Feng, Cuiyang & Zhou, Hao & Zhang, Li & Wu, Xiaohui & Qi, Jianchuan & Yang, Xuechun & Liang, Yuhan, 2021. "Critical provincial transmission sectors for carbon dioxide emissions in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    13. Rui Huang & Shaohui Zhang & Changxin Liu, 2018. "Comparing Urban and Rural Household CO 2 Emissions—Case from China’s Four Megacities: Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, and Chongqing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, May.
    14. Liu, Xiaolian & Udemba, Edmund Ntom & Emir, Firat & Hussain, Sadam & Khan, Nazakat Ullah & Abdallah, Ibrahim, 2024. "Nexus between resource policy, renewable energy policy and export diversification: Asymmetric study of environment quality towards sustainable development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Siming Zuo & Mingxia Zhu & Zhexiao Xu & Judit Oláh & Zoltan Lakner, 2021. "The Dynamic Impact of Natural Resource Rents, Financial Development, and Technological Innovations on Environmental Quality: Empirical Evidence from BRI Economies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Cong, Yufei & Ren, Chunhong, 2023. "Does Natural resource dependency impede sustainable development? Exploring the non-linear consequence of economic complexity," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    17. Erdogan, Sinan, 2024. "On the impact of natural resources on environmental sustainability in African countries: A comparative approach based on the EKC and LCC hypotheses," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    18. Yingying Hu & Wei Wu, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Variation and Driving Factors of Embodied Carbon in China-G7 Trade," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Javed, Hasnain & Du, Jianguo & Iqbal, Shuja & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Basheer, Muhammad Farhan, 2024. "The impact of mineral resource abundance on environmental degradation in ten mineral- rich countries: Do the green innovation and financial technology matter?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    20. Simon Schulte & Arthur Jakobs & Stefan Pauliuk, 2021. "Relaxing the import proportionality assumption in multi-regional input–output modelling," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11782-:d:919167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.