IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i18p11534-d914775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Affecting Organisations’ Adoption Behaviour toward Blockchain-Based Distributed Identity Management: The Sustainability of Self-Sovereign Identity in Organisations

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Mulombo Mulaji

    (Department of Information Systems, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa)

  • Sumarie Roodt

    (Department of Information Systems, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town 7701, South Africa)

Abstract

Blockchain-based Distributed Identity Management (BDIDM) can enhance sustainable identification and authentication of users on organisations’ digital systems. But there is not a clear consensus on how organisations perceive the value proposition of such technology, nor what might affect their adoption behaviour toward it. This research explains how technological, organisational and environmental (TOE) factors affect organisations’ adoption behaviour toward BDIDM. This study aims to determine the most critical factors affecting the behaviour while assessing the effectiveness and appropriateness of the model involved, i.e., TOE-BDIDM. Online questionnaires are used to survey 111 information and cybersecurity practitioners within South African organisations. The analysis combines binary logistic regression modelling, Structural Equation Modelling of the measurement model, and chi-squared tests. The results suggest TOE factors positively or negatively affect adoption behaviour. The behaviour is significantly affected by technology characteristics, i.e., BDIDM’s disruptive nature, and is associated with Blockchain type. Indeed, the majority of participants intended to recommend BDIDM to their organisations yet paradoxically preferred private-permissioned blockchain the most, revealing resistance to decentralised and privacy-preserving BDIDM models like Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI). The latter might be utopian or unsustainable for organisations. TOE-BDIDM was found relatively appropriate and effective but arguably ‘incomplete’ for explaining the adoption of disruptive technologies like SSI in organisations. TOE should extend to TOEU by including the User factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Mulombo Mulaji & Sumarie Roodt, 2022. "Factors Affecting Organisations’ Adoption Behaviour toward Blockchain-Based Distributed Identity Management: The Sustainability of Self-Sovereign Identity in Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11534-:d:914775
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11534/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/18/11534/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hart O. Awa & Ojiabo Ukoha & Bartholomew C. Emecheta, 2016. "Using T-O-E theoretical framework to study the adoption of ERP solution," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1196571-119, December.
    2. Marian STOICA & Bogdan GHILIC-MICU & Marinela MIRCEA, 2019. "Restarting the Information Society Based on Blockchain Technology," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(3), pages 39-48.
    3. Kshetri, Nir, 2017. "Blockchain's roles in strengthening cybersecurity and protecting privacy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(10), pages 1027-1038.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ammar AL-Ashmori & Gunasekar Thangarasu & P. D. D. Dominic & Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi, 2023. "A Readiness Model and Factors Influencing Blockchain Adoption in Malaysia’s Software Sector: A Survey Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahmoona Khalil & Kausar Fiaz Khawaja & Muddassar Sarfraz, 2022. "The adoption of blockchain technology in the financial sector during the era of fourth industrial revolution: a moderated mediated model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2435-2452, August.
    2. Srivastava, Deepak Kumar & Kumar, Vikas & Ekren, Banu Yetkin & Upadhyay, Arvind & Tyagi, Mrinal & Kumari, Archana, 2022. "Adopting Industry 4.0 by leveraging organisational factors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Erhan Baran & Tulay Korkusuz Polat, 2022. "Classification of Industry 4.0 for Total Quality Management: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Hiran, Kamal Kant & Dadhich, Manish, 2024. "Predicting the core determinants of cloud-edge computing adoption (CECA) for sustainable development in the higher education institutions of Africa: A high order SEM-ANN analytical approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. Queiroz, Maciel M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2019. "Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: An empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 70-82.
    6. Xiaobao Zhu & Jing Shi & Fengjie Xie & Rouqi Song, 2020. "Pricing strategy and system performance in a cloud-based manufacturing system built on blockchain technology," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(8), pages 1985-2002, December.
    7. Alovsat Garaja ALIYEV, 2022. "Study of Development Trends and Application Risks of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Technologies in the Digital Environment," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 26(3), pages 37-49.
    8. Kirimhan, Destan, 2023. "Importance of anti-money laundering regulations among prosumers for a cybersecure decentralized finance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Macnish, Kevin & van der Ham, Jeroen, 2020. "Ethics in cybersecurity research and practice," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    10. Ma, Chao-Qun & Lei, Yu-Tian & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Chen, Xun-Qi & Wang, Yi-Ran & Narayan, Seema, 2024. "Systematic analysis of the blockchain in the energy sector: Trends, issues, and future directions," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).
    11. Niloofar Etemadi & Pieter Van Gelder & Fernanda Strozzi, 2021. "An ISM Modeling of Barriers for Blockchain/Distributed Ledger Technology Adoption in Supply Chains towards Cybersecurity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-28, April.
    12. Leny Vinceslas & Safak Dogan & Srikumar Sundareshwar & Ahmet M. Kondoz, 2023. "Abstracting Data in Distributed Ledger Systems for Higher Level Analytics and Visualizations," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Aristotelis Mavidis & Dimitris Folinas, 2022. "From Public E-Procurement 3.0 to E-Procurement 4.0; A Critical Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-23, September.
    14. Priti Jagwani & V. B. Singh & Noopur Agrawal & Aditya P. Tripathi, 2023. "Blockchain technology and software engineering practices: a systematic review of literature using topic modelling approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Mulligan, Catherine & Morsfield, Suzanne & Cheikosman, Evîn, 2024. "Blockchain for sustainability: A systematic literature review for policy impact," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).
    16. Konstantinos Siassiakos & Stamatia Ilioudi & Tsaktsira Effrosyni & Vasiliki Mitsiou & Dimitris Nanouris, 2020. "Utilization of Blockchain Technology in Greek Public Administration," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12.
    17. Viktorija Skvarciany & Daiva Jurevičienė, 2018. "Factors Influencing Individual Customers Trust in Internet Banking: Case of Baltic States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    18. Serrano-Calle, Silvia & Robles, Tomás & Martín, Diego & Mateos, Raquel, 2018. "Digitalization of Operations Management with Emotional and Intelligence Tools. Blockchain and IoT integration, the last disruption?," 29th European Regional ITS Conference, Trento 2018 184967, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    19. Catarina Lemos & Ricardo F. Ramos & Sérgio Moro & Pedro Miguel Oliveira, 2022. "Stick or Twist—The Rise of Blockchain Applications in Marketing Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Hosam A. Althibyani & Abdulrahman M. Al-Zahrani, 2023. "Investigating the Effect of Students’ Knowledge, Beliefs, and Digital Citizenship Skills on the Prevention of Cybercrime," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:18:p:11534-:d:914775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.