IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10940-d904383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COVID-19-Adapted Multi-Functional Corniche Street Design Assessment Model: Applying Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) and Adaptability Analysis Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Arezou Shafaghat

    (Department of Construction Management, College of Architecture and Construction Management, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, GA 30060, USA
    Department of Architecture, College of Architecture and Construction Management, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, GA 30060, USA)

  • Salim Ferwati

    (Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar)

  • Ali Keyvanfar

    (Department of Construction Management, College of Architecture and Construction Management, Kennesaw State University, Marietta, GA 30060, USA)

Abstract

The world-shaking communicable coronavirus disease (i.e., COVID-19) has become a pandemic threat to a healthy built environment. This study aimed to develop the COVID-19-adapted multi-functional corniche street design (Ca-MCSD) assessment model. Accordingly, this study identified variables coordinating the local environmental, physical, social, cultural, and political mediations of multi-functional corniche street design. Secondly, it measured the weight of every single variable through confirmatory analysis, normalization, and standardization techniques, and an expert-input study then developed the MCSD model and Ca-MCSD model. This study validated the models through a case study (i.e., Al Wakrah corniche street in Dubai, Qatar) and conducted ANOVA regression analysis and global sensitivity analysis (GSA). The Ca-MCSD model evaluates the design quality of a corniche street across five criteria—inclusiveness, desirable activities, safety, comfort, and pleasurability—and forty-two sub-criteria. The regression analysis determined that the MCSD model and Ca-MCSD model are linearly and positively correlated (Y = 0.811777X + 0.383401), where the Pearson regression coefficient (r) equaled 0.903729, r 2 equaled 0.816727, and the p -value was 0.025 with 95% confidence intervals. The research found that, before the COVID-19 pandemic, microclimate comfort (avW Sc.3.4 = 7.880), community gathering places (Sc.2.1), availability of foods (Sc.2.4), appropriate maintenance and physical condition (Sc.3.6), and attractiveness of space (Sc.5.8) (avW = 6.000) played critical roles in designing a multi-functional corniche street. However, after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the key drivers changed to microclimate comfort (favW Sc.3.4 = 12.632), appropriate maintenance and physical condition (favW Sc.3.6 = 9.618), physical/visual connection or openness to adjacent spaces (favW Sc.4.1 = 4.809), and over-securitization (favW Sc.4.1 = 4.287).

Suggested Citation

  • Arezou Shafaghat & Salim Ferwati & Ali Keyvanfar, 2022. "COVID-19-Adapted Multi-Functional Corniche Street Design Assessment Model: Applying Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) and Adaptability Analysis Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10940-:d:904383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10940/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10940/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mojtaba Valibeigi & Fateme Ghorbani & Roxana Jahanmehmani, 2019. "Perceived Environmental Response Mechanism in Tehran Public Spaces," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 143(2), pages 839-858, June.
    2. You Peng & Zhikai Peng & Tao Feng & Chixing Zhong & Wei Wang, 2021. "Assessing Comfort in Urban Public Spaces: A Structural Equation Model Involving Environmental Attitude and Perception," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Ali Keyvanfar & M. Salim Ferwati & Arezou Shafaghat & Hasanuddin Lamit, 2018. "A Path Walkability Assessment Index Model for Evaluating and Facilitating Retail Walking Using Decision-Tree-Making (DTM) Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-33, March.
    4. Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Stephanie Rodriguez-Besteiro & Juan José Cabello-Eras & Alvaro Bustamante-Sanchez & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Macarena Donoso-Gonzalez & Ana Isabel Beltrán-Velasco & J, 2022. "Sustainable Development Goals in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Narrative Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-26, June.
    5. Cristina Davino & Marco Gherghi & Silvia Sorana & Domenico Vistocco, 2021. "Measuring Social Vulnerability in an Urban Space Through Multivariate Methods and Models," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 1179-1201, October.
    6. Berke, E.M. & Koepsell, T.D. & Moudon, A.V. & Hoskins, R.E. & Larson, E.B., 2007. "Association of the built environment with physical activity and obesity in older persons," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(3), pages 486-492.
    7. Sungduck Lee, 2022. "The safety of public space: urban design guidelines for neighborhood park planning," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 222-240, April.
    8. Noacco, Valentina & Sarrazin, Fanny & Pianosi, Francesca & Wagener, Thorsten, 2019. "Matlab/R workflows to assess critical choices in Global Sensitivity Analysis using the SAFE toolbox," Earth Arxiv pu83z, Center for Open Science.
    9. Miguel Lopes & Ana Camanho, 2013. "Public Green Space Use and Consequences on Urban Vitality: An Assessment of European Cities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 113(3), pages 751-767, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jiawei Li & Jun Zhang, 2024. "A Study on the Impact of Street Environment on Elderly Leisure Path Preferences Based on the Stated Preference Method (SP Method)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Paköz, Muhammed Ziya & Yaratgan, Dilara & Şahin, Aydan, 2022. "Re-mapping urban vitality through Jane Jacobs’ criteria: The case of Kayseri, Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    3. José Sobreiro Filho & Enzo Barberio Mariano & Vinicius Amorim Sobreiro & Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour, 2016. "Beyond the Agrarian Reform Policies in Brazil: An Empirical Study of Brazilian States from 1995 Through 2011," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(3), pages 1093-1114, December.
    4. Aurélie Mercier & Stéphanie Souche‐Le Corvec & Nicolas Ovtracht, 2021. "Measure of accessibility to postal services in France: A potential spatial accessibility approach applied in an urban region," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 100(1), pages 227-249, February.
    5. Jue Wang & Mei-Po Kwan & Yanwei Chai, 2018. "An Innovative Context-Based Crystal-Growth Activity Space Method for Environmental Exposure Assessment: A Study Using GIS and GPS Trajectory Data Collected in Chicago," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, April.
    6. Zhenhua Zheng & Hong Chen & Junling Gao, 2021. "Age Differences in the Influence of Residential Environment and Behavior on the Life Quality of Older Adults: The Transfer from Physical-Environment to Social-Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Wanying Zhong & Yue Wang, 2022. "A study on the spatial and temporal variation of urban integrated vulnerability in Southwest China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(3), pages 2855-2882, December.
    8. Fabiana R. Sousa-Mast & Arianne C. Reis & Marcelo C. Vieira & Sandro Sperandei & Luilma A. Gurgel & Uwe Pühse, 2017. "Does being an Olympic city help improve recreational resources? Examining the quality of physical activity resources in a low-income neighborhood of Rio de Janeiro," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 62(2), pages 263-268, March.
    9. Amer Habibullah & Nawaf Alhajaj & Ahmad Fallatah, 2022. "One-Kilometer Walking Limit during COVID-19: Evaluating Accessibility to Residential Public Open Spaces in a Major Saudi City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Zhenhua Zheng & Hong Chen & Liu Yang, 2019. "Transfer of Promotion Effects on Elderly Health with Age: From Physical Environment to Interpersonal Environment and Social Participation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Clarke, Philippa J. & Ailshire, Jennifer A. & Nieuwenhuijsen, Els R. & de Kleijn - de Vrankrijker, Marijke W., 2011. "Participation among adults with disability: The role of the urban environment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(10), pages 1674-1684, May.
    12. Neatt, Kevin & Millward, Hugh & Spinney, Jamie, 2017. "Neighborhood walking densities: A multivariate analysis in Halifax, Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 9-16.
    13. Guancen Wu & Dongqin Yang & Xing Niu & Zixuan Mi, 2024. "The Impact of Park Green Space Areas on Urban Vitality: A Case Study of 35 Large and Medium-Sized Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Folk, György, 2019. "Weal: the universal core of human well-being," MPRA Paper 97082, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Jinyao Lin & Yaye Zhuang & Yang Zhao & Hua Li & Xiaoyu He & Siyan Lu, 2022. "Measuring the Non-Linear Relationship between Three-Dimensional Built Environment and Urban Vitality Based on a Random Forest Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Peng Zang & Fei Xian & Hualong Qiu & Shifa Ma & Hongxu Guo & Mengrui Wang & Linchuan Yang, 2022. "Differences in the Correlation between the Built Environment and Walking, Moderate, and Vigorous Physical Activity among the Elderly in Low- and High-Income Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Perchoux, Camille & Kestens, Yan & Thomas, Frédérique & Hulst, Andraea Van & Thierry, Benoit & Chaix, Basile, 2014. "Assessing patterns of spatial behavior in health studies: Their socio-demographic determinants and associations with transportation modes (the RECORD Cohort Study)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 64-73.
    18. Gerlinde Grasser & Delfien Dyck & Sylvia Titze & Willibald Stronegger, 2013. "Objectively measured walkability and active transport and weight-related outcomes in adults: a systematic review," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 58(4), pages 615-625, August.
    19. Pengxiang Zhao & Mei-Po Kwan & Suhong Zhou, 2018. "The Uncertain Geographic Context Problem in the Analysis of the Relationships between Obesity and the Built Environment in Guangzhou," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, February.
    20. Jinghua Song & Yuyi Zhu & Xiangzhai Chu & Xiu Yang, 2024. "Research on the Vitality of Public Spaces in Tourist Villages through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of Mochou Village in Hubei, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10940-:d:904383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.