IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10537-d896078.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mapping of the Interests and Influences Perceived in the Actors That Make Up the National System of Innovation in Rehabilitation in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Juanita Irina Sánchez Romero

    (Doctorado en Gestión de la Tecnología y la Innovación, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia)

  • Ricardo León Sánchez Arenas

    (Grupo FISIOTER, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Fundación Universitaria María Cano, Medellín 050012, Colombia)

  • Vera Z. Pérez

    (Grupo de Investigaciones en, Facultad de Ingeniería Electrónica, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Bioingeniería, Medellín 050031, Colombia)

  • Carlos Ocampo-López

    (Centro de Estudios y de Investigación en Biotecnología (CIBIOT), Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia)

  • Diana P. Giraldo

    (Grupo Gestión de la Tecnología y la Innovación—GTI, Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín 050031, Colombia)

Abstract

In the last 20 years, there has been an increase in the research and development of technologies that contribute to the physical, occupational, and language rehabilitation processes of people with disabilities. This has led to the management of technology in rehabilitation acquiring relevance. This study identifies the actors involved in innovation activities in rehabilitation and determines their interest and influence on the dynamics of the system, taking Colombia as a case study, including its 32 departments and its capital. Methodologically, the research has a quantitative approach of a descriptive correlational type. The design is non-experimental and cross-sectional. A heat map is used to represent the changes and magnitudes of the data, and the Key Actor Mapping methodology is used to compare the results of the variables studied. The results show the participation of actors that are currently not politically recognized as agents of the system. On the other hand, the interest and influence of the actors in the innovative performance of the system are changing. The main implication of this study is that the innovation system in rehabilitation in developing countries has not been studied and documented completely. This study is the first contribution to this global analysis. Nevertheless, the argumentation in the Latin American context is limited due to the absence of available data required for a sufficient comparison. It is necessary to determine the patterns of linkage between the actors to define strategies for the dynamization of the system that results in innovations that contribute to the welfare and social inclusion of the population with disabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Juanita Irina Sánchez Romero & Ricardo León Sánchez Arenas & Vera Z. Pérez & Carlos Ocampo-López & Diana P. Giraldo, 2022. "Mapping of the Interests and Influences Perceived in the Actors That Make Up the National System of Innovation in Rehabilitation in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10537-:d:896078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10537/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10537/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ullmann, Heidi & Cecchini, Simone & Atuesta, Bernardo & Rubio García, Mónica, 2021. "Las transferencias monetarias no contributivas: un instrumento para promover los derechos y el bienestar de la población infantil con discapacidad en América Latina y el Caribe," Documentos de Proyectos 46626, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. Proksch, Dorian & Busch-Casler, Julia & Haberstroh, Marcus Max & Pinkwart, Andreas, 2019. "National health innovation systems: Clustering the OECD countries by innovative output in healthcare using a multi indicator approach," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 169-179.
    3. Bauer, Stephen M, 2003. "Demand Pull Technology Transfer Applied to the Field of Assistive Technology," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 28(3-4), pages 285-303, August.
    4. Celeste Amorim Varum & Carlos Pinho, 2007. "Searching For Sectoral Patterns Of Innovation In European Manufacturing Industry," Working Papers de Economia (Economics Working Papers) 48, Departamento de Economia, Gestão e Engenharia Industrial, Universidade de Aveiro.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cooley, Savannah & Jenkins, Amber & Schaeffer, Blake & Bormann, Kat J. & Abdallah, Adel & Melton, Forrest & Granger, Stephanie & Graczyk, Indrani, 2022. "Paths to research-driven decision making in the realms of environment and water," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. repec:oup:rseval:v:32:y:2024:i:2:p:426-440. is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Thanos Fragkandreas, 2023. "Case study research on innovation systems: paradox, dialectical analysis and resolution," Working Papers 65, Birkbeck Centre for Innovation Management Research, revised 15 May 2023.
    4. Jesús Muyor-Rodríguez & Virginia Fuentes-Gutiérrez & Yolanda María De la Fuente-Robles & Teresa Amezcua-Aguilar, 2021. "Inclusive University Education in Bolivia: The Actors and Their Discourses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Kim, Jong-Seok & Kim, Byung-Keun, 2022. "Examining different technology transfer capabilities and their counterpart works from two different positions," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    6. Adrián A & Oscar Llopis & Pablo D’Este & Jordi Molas-Gallart, 2023. "Assessing the variety of collaborative practices in translational research: An analysis of scientists’ ego-networks," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 426-440.
    7. Mashiho Mihalache & Oli Mihalache & Jan Ende, 2021. "International Diversification and MNE Innovativeness: A Contingency Perspective of Foreign Subsidiary Portfolio Characteristics," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 769-798, December.
    8. Won Jun Choe & Ilyong Ji, 2019. "The Performance of Supply-Push Versus Demand-Pull Technology Transfer and the Role of Technology Marketing Strategies: The Case of a Korean Public Research Institute," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, April.
    9. Puertas, Rosa & Marti, Luisa & Guaita-Martinez, José M., 2020. "Innovation, lifestyle, policy and socioeconomic factors: An analysis of European quality of life," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    10. Blaženka Popović & Svjetlana Janković Šoja & Tamara Paunović & Radojka Maletić, 2019. "Evaluation of Sustainable Development Management in EU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Williams, Christopher, 2021. "Global human burden and official development assistance in health R&D: The role of medical absorptive capacity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    12. Allers, Sanne & Eijkenaar, Frank & van Raaij, Erik M. & Schut, Frederik T., 2023. "The long and winding road towards payment for healthcare innovation with high societal value but limited commercial value: A comparative case study of devices and health information technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    13. Elena Lascu & Irina Severin & Florina Daniela Lascu & Razvan Adrian Gudana & Gabriela Nalbitoru & Nicoleta Daniela Ignat, 2021. "Framework on Performance Management in Automotive Industry: A Case Study," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Domenico Bevere & Nicola Faccilongo, 2024. "Shaping the Future of Healthcare: Integrating Ecology and Digital Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-20, May.
    15. S. I. Kravchenko, 2022. "Identification Of The National Innovation System In A Globalized Environment," Strategic decisions and risk management, Real Economy Publishing House, vol. 12(4).
    16. Wen, Jun & Deng, Peidong & Fu, Qiang & Chang, Chun-Ping, 2022. "Does health innovation relieve disease burden? The comprehensive evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10537-:d:896078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.