IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p9989-d886672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Axial Behavior of FRP Confined Concrete Using Locally Available Low-Cost Wraps

Author

Listed:
  • Asad U. Qazi

    (Civil Engineering Department, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan)

  • Qasim S. Khan

    (Civil Engineering Department, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan)

  • H. Abrar Ahmad

    (Architectural Engineering Department, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore 54890, Pakistan)

  • Thong M. Pham

    (School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley 6102, Australia)

Abstract

This study investigates the influences of three types of locally available low-cost Fiber Reinforced Polymers (FRP) wraps and two concrete mix designs on the axial behavior of FRP confined concrete. The experimental program comprised four unconfined (control), four glass FRP Matt Strand (GFRP-MS) confined concrete, four glass FRP Rowing (GFRP-R) confined concrete and four carbon FRP (CFRP) confined concrete specimens with a diameter of 150 mm and a height of 300 mm tested under axial compression. The specimens were prepared using two normal strength concrete mix designs, i.e., Mix-A and Mix-B. The experimental results exhibited that an increase in the confined concrete strength per unit cost ratio of a single layer of GFRP-MS was about two times of a single layer of CFRP wrap, whereas the increase in confined concrete strength per unit cost ratio of single layer of GFRP-R was about four times of a single layer of CFRP wrap. GFRP-MS and GFRP-R wraps can exhibit similar confined strengths as CFRP wrap with six and twelve times lower costs, respectively, than CFRP wrap. Mix-B concrete specimens exhibited higher confined concrete strengths but lower confined concrete strain than Mix-A concrete specimens. A database of 140 FRP confined concrete specimens was developed based on a set of specific criteria to develop a design-oriented model to predict the FRP confined concrete strength. The predicted confined concrete strengths matched well with the experimental confined concrete strengths. The two layers of GFRP-R exhibited similar confined concrete strength as CFRP wrap. In addition, GFRP-R exhibited high cement strength index (CSI) and low embodied CO 2 index (CI).

Suggested Citation

  • Asad U. Qazi & Qasim S. Khan & H. Abrar Ahmad & Thong M. Pham, 2022. "Axial Behavior of FRP Confined Concrete Using Locally Available Low-Cost Wraps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9989-:d:886672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9989/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9989/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saim Raza & Muhammad K. I. Khan & Scott J. Menegon & Hing-Ho Tsang & John L. Wilson, 2019. "Strengthening and Repair of Reinforced Concrete Columns by Jacketing: State-of-the-Art Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-31, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Theodoros Chrysanidis & Dimitra Mousama & Eleni Tzatzo & Nikolaos Alamanis & Dimos Zachos, 2022. "Study of the Effect of a Seismic Zone to the Construction Cost of a Five-Story Reinforced Concrete Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Zixiang Yue & Qingjie Wen & Youliang Ding, 2022. "Research on Torsional Characteristic and Stiffness Reinforcement of Main Girder of Half-Through Truss Bridge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Emmanouil Golias & Adamantis G. Zapris & Violetta K. Kytinou & George I. Kalogeropoulos & Constantin E. Chalioris & Chris G. Karayannis, 2021. "Effectiveness of the Novel Rehabilitation Method of Seismically Damaged RC Joints Using C-FRP Ropes and Comparison with Widely Applied Method Using C-FRP Sheets—Experimental Investigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9989-:d:886672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.