IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p9867-d884625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Different Row Spacing and Weed Control Intervals on Weed Infestation and Yield-Related Traits of American ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) and Desi ( Gossypium arboreum ) Cotton

Author

Listed:
  • Mubshar Hussain

    (Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
    School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, 90 South Street, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia)

  • Muhammad Haider Abbas

    (Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Abdul Majeed

    (Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Waqas Ahmed Minhas

    (Department of Agronomy, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan 60800, Pakistan)

  • Shahid Farooq

    (Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Harran University, Şanlıurfa 63050, Turkey)

  • Khawar Jabran

    (Department of Plant Production and Technologies, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Nigde Omer Halisdemir University, Nigde 51240, Turkey)

Abstract

Narrow row spacing has attracted significant attention due to its beneficial impacts on weed management in cotton. This study compared the effects of normal and ultra-narrow row spacing on critical periods of weed control in American ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) and ‘Desi’ ( Gossypium arboreum ) cotton. Two different row spacings (i.e., recommended (75 cm) and ultra-narrow (30 cm)) and three weed control intervals (i.e., weed control at 30, 60 and 90 days after sowing (DAS)) were included in the study. Weedy-check and weed-free treatments were included in the experiment as controls for comparison. ‘Desi’ cotton grown under ultra-narrow spacing recorded the lowest weed density and individual density of Trianthema portulacastarum L., Cyperus rotundus L., Cynodon dactylon L., Echinochloa colona (L.) Link and Digera muricata (L.) Mart. Moreover, ‘Desi’ cotton sown under ultra-narrow spacing with weed-free and weed control at 30 DAS resulted in the highest leaf area index (LAI), leaf area duration (LAD), net assimilation late (NAR), root elongation rate (RER) and root growth rate (RGR) at all sampling dates. Likewise, ‘desi’ cotton sown under recommended row spacing and weed-free conditions produced the highest number of sympodial and monopodial branches, number of flowers and bolls per plant, whereas the highest seed cotton yield of ‘Desi’ cotton was noted under ultra-narrow spacing and weed-free conditions. It is concluded that sowing both cotton types in ultra-narrow row spacing and controlling weeds at 30 DAS will result in lower weed infestation and higher seed cotton yield.

Suggested Citation

  • Mubshar Hussain & Muhammad Haider Abbas & Abdul Majeed & Waqas Ahmed Minhas & Shahid Farooq & Khawar Jabran, 2022. "The Influence of Different Row Spacing and Weed Control Intervals on Weed Infestation and Yield-Related Traits of American ( Gossypium hirsutum L.) and Desi ( Gossypium arboreum ) Cotton," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9867-:d:884625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9867/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/9867/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Naved Hamid & Ijaz Nabi & Rafia Zafar, 2014. "The Textiles and Garments Sector: Moving Up the Value Chain," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 19(Special E), pages 283-306, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naved Hamid & Maha Khan, 2015. "Pakistan: A Case of Premature Deindustrialization?," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 20(Special E), pages 107-141, September.
    2. Theresa Thompson Chaudhry & Mahvish Faran, 2016. "Same Jeans, Same Stitch? A Comparison of Denim Production Across Three Factories in Punjab, Pakistan," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 21(Special E), pages 211-236, September.
    3. Ayesha Javed & Rao Muhammad Atif, 2021. "Global Value Chain: An Analysis of Pakistan’s Textile Sector," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 22(4), pages 879-892, August.
    4. Rajah Rasiah & Nazia Nazeer, 2016. "Comparing Industrialization in Pakistan and the East Asian Economies," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 21(Special E), pages 167-192, September.
    5. Enrico Fontana & Muhammad Atif & Huma Sarwar, 2024. "Pressures for sub‐supplier sustainability compliance: The importance of target markets in textile and garment supply chains," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 3794-3810, July.
    6. Ayşegül Toy & Ayhan Kapusuzoğlu & Nildağ Başak Ceylan, 2022. "The Effect of Working Capital Management on the Performance of the Textile Firms: Evidence from Fragile Five Countries (FFCs)," Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, Ersan ERSOY, vol. 7(4), pages 814-838.
    7. Nazia Nazeer & Rajah Rasiah, 2016. "Explaining Pakistan’s Premature Deindustrialization," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 21(Special E), pages 351-368, September.
    8. Khalil Hamdani, 2015. "Globalization: The Challenge for Pakistan," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 20(Special E), pages 225-240, September.
    9. Jaffar Abbas & Qingyu Zhang & Iftikhar Hussain & Sabahat Akram & Aneeqa Afaq & Muhammad Afzal Shad, 2020. "Sustainable Innovation in Small Medium Enterprises: The Impact of Knowledge Management on Organizational Innovation through a Mediation Analysis by Using SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:9867-:d:884625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.