IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10455-d894848.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of KROQI as a Level-2 Common Data Environment in the French Construction Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Marin Bedoiseau

    (Research Laboratory on Information Technology in Construction, Department of Construction Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame Street West, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)

  • David Martin

    (Research Laboratory on Information Technology in Construction, Department of Construction Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame Street West, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)

  • Conrad Boton

    (Research Laboratory on Information Technology in Construction, Department of Construction Engineering, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre-Dame Street West, Montreal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada)

Abstract

The implementation of a common data environment (CDE) in the construction industry appears to be crucial for organizing and managing the flow of important information within construction projects effectively. However, it is observed that the investments and the costs associated with setting up such environments are often dissuasive, particularly for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). By launching the Plan BIM 2022 in 2017, the French government aimed to combat the emerging digital divide between large and small construction companies. At the heart of this state-funded plan was the development of a CDE-like collaborative platform called KROQI. The work presented in this article proposes a three-level matrix to characterize common data environments based on computer-supported collaboration work theories. The paper demonstrates how KROQI can be characterized as a level-2 CDE solution. Based on a preliminary study, it explores the perception and satisfaction of practitioners with respect to the features proposed by KROQI. The results show that, among the large variety of features proposed, some are hardly ever used. Therefore, while KROQI appears to be an excellent industry-wide solution aimed at federating initiatives towards digital collaboration centered around BIM models, there is definitely room for improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Marin Bedoiseau & David Martin & Conrad Boton, 2022. "Use of KROQI as a Level-2 Common Data Environment in the French Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10455-:d:894848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10455/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10455/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Conrad Boton, 2020. "Remote Teaching of Building Information Modeling During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ryszard Dindorf & Piotr Wos, 2024. "Challenges of Robotic Technology in Sustainable Construction Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-26, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Triana Aguirre & Leire Aperribai & Lorea Cortabarría & Emilio Verche & África Borges, 2022. "Challenges for Teachers’ and Students’ Digital Abilities: A Mixed Methods Design Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-9, April.
    2. Iñigo Leon & Maialen Sagarna & Fernando Mora & Juan Pedro Otaduy, 2021. "BIM Application for Sustainable Teaching Environment and Solutions in the Context of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10455-:d:894848. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.