IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10208-d890298.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Development of Audit Market: Benefits of Audit Price Deregulation in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yanming Cao

    (School of Business, Macquarie University, 4 Eastern Road, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia)

  • Zhongwei Zhao

    (School of Economics and Management, Weifang University of Science and Technology, Weifang 262700, China)

  • Ning Wang

    (School of Business, Macquarie University, 4 Eastern Road, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia)

  • Liming Zhao

    (School of Business, Macquarie University, 4 Eastern Road, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia)

Abstract

Utilizing a unique audit price deregulation policy in China, we examine industry-specialized auditors’ competing strategies in different markets. Our results from the difference-in-difference model reveal that after audit price deregulation, audit fees of industry-specialized auditors in less developed markets become significantly lower than other auditors. Furthermore, we find the decreased audit fees of the industry specialists are not due to the reduced audit effort, and the audit quality is not impaired. On the other hand, industry specialists cannot keep their audit fee premium in more developed markets after the policy. These results indicate that audit price deregulation makes industry-specialized auditors more available, which benefits the market’s sustainable development. Our study contributes significantly to the industry specialized auditor literature by providing novel evidence that industry specialists’ competing strategies could depend on the market’s development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanming Cao & Zhongwei Zhao & Ning Wang & Liming Zhao, 2022. "Sustainable Development of Audit Market: Benefits of Audit Price Deregulation in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10208-:d:890298
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10208/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10208/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph H. Zhang, 2018. "Accounting Comparability, Audit Effort, and Audit Outcomes," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(1), pages 245-276, March.
    2. Guan, Yuyan & Su, Lixin (Nancy) & Wu, Donghui & Yang, Zhifeng, 2016. "Do school ties between auditors and client executives influence audit outcomes?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 506-525.
    3. Mike Qinghao Mao & Yangxin Yu, 2015. "Analysts' Cash Flow Forecasts, Audit Effort, and Audit Opinions on Internal Control," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(5-6), pages 635-664, June.
    4. Ku He & Xiaofei Pan & Gary Tian, 2017. "Legal Liability, Government Intervention, and Auditor Behavior: Evidence from Structural Reform of Audit Firms in China," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 61-95, January.
    5. Jonathan H. Grenier & Bradley Pomeroy & Matthew T. Stern, 2015. "The Effects of Accounting Standard Precision, Auditor Task Expertise, and Judgment Frameworks on Audit Firm Litigation Exposure," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 336-357, March.
    6. Firth, Michael & Rui, Oliver M. & Wu, Xi, 2012. "How Do Various Forms of Auditor Rotation Affect Audit Quality? Evidence from China," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 109-138.
    7. Rui Zhang & Raymond M. K. Wong & Agnes W. Y. Lo & Gaoliang Tian, 2022. "Can mandatory dual audit reduce the cost of equity? Evidence from China," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(3), pages 291-320, April.
    8. Ettredge, Michael & Fuerherm, Elizabeth Emeigh & Li, Chan, 2014. "Fee pressure and audit quality," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 247-263.
    9. Hanwen Chen & Jeff Zeyun Chen & Gerald J. Lobo & Yanyan Wang, 2011. "Effects of Audit Quality on Earnings Management and Cost of Equity Capital: Evidence from China," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(3), pages 892-925, September.
    10. DeFond, Mark & Zhang, Jieying, 2014. "A review of archival auditing research," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 275-326.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Alon & Oksana Kim, 2022. "Protectionism through legislative layering: Implications for auditors and investors," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 5(3), pages 363-383, September.
    2. Guangming Gong & Liang Xiao & Si Xu & Xun Gong, 2019. "Do Bond Investors Care About Engagement Auditors’ Negative Experiences? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 779-806, September.
    3. Patrick Velte, 2023. "The impact of external auditors on firms’ financial restatements: a review of archival studies and implications for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 959-985, September.
    4. Athavale, Manoj & Guo, Zhaorui & Meng, Yun & Zhang, Tianshu, 2022. "Diversity of signing auditors and audit quality: Evidence from capital market in China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 554-571.
    5. Ole‐Kristian Hope & Pingui Rao & Yanping Xu & Heng Yue, 2023. "Information sharing between mutual funds and auditors," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(1-2), pages 152-197, January.
    6. Han, Hongwen & Tang, Jiali Jenna & Tang, Qingquan, 2024. "The role of large shareholders in goodwill impairment decisions – Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    7. Zhang, Min & Xu, Haoran & Li, Xu, 2017. "The Effect of Previous Working Relationship between Rotating Partners on Mandatory Audit Partner Rotation," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 101-121.
    8. Xingqiang Du, 2019. "Does CEO-Auditor Dialect Sharing Impair Pre-IPO Audit Quality? Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 699-735, May.
    9. Pan, Yue & Shroff, Nemit & Zhang, Pengdong, 2023. "The dark side of audit market competition," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    10. Muhammad Farhan Malik & Yuan George Shan & Jamie Yixing Tong, 2022. "Do auditors price litigious tone?," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1715-1760, April.
    11. Cao, June & Ee, Mong Shan & Hasan, Iftekhar & Huang, He, 2024. "Asymmetric reactions of abnormal audit fees jump to credit rating changes," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(2).
    12. Jingyu Yang & Hai Wu & Yangxin Yu, 2021. "Distracted institutional investors and audit risk," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 3855-3881, September.
    13. Xiong, Hao & Hou, Fei & Li, Hanwen & Wang, Huabing, 2020. "Does rice farming shape audit quality: Evidence from signing auditors level analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 403-420.
    14. Kharuddin, Khairul Ayuni Mohd & Basioudis, Ilias G & Farooque, Omar Al, 2021. "Effects of the Big 4 national and city-level industry expertise on audit quality in the United Kingdom," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    15. Bandyopadhyay, Sati P. & Chen, Changling & Yu, Yingmin, 2014. "Mandatory audit partner rotation, audit market concentration, and audit quality: Evidence from China," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 18-31.
    16. Liao, Fang-nan & Zhang, Chuancai & Zhang, Jin-jin & Yan, Xiang & Chen, Tian-xiang, 2024. "Hyperbole or reality? The effect of auditors' AI education on audit report timeliness," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    17. Laudemann, & al.,, 2016. "Die zeitliche Entwicklung von Abschlussprüferhonoraren in Deutschland – Eine empirische Untersuchung der Jahre 2009 bis 2013," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 70(2), pages 153-186.
    18. Rezaee, Zabihollah & Dou, Huan & Zhang, Huili, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and earnings quality: Evidence from China," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    19. Zhichao Zhang & Fangjun Wang, 2023. "Managerial short‐termism and financial statement comparability," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(5), pages 5027-5067, December.
    20. Giuseppe Iuliano & Gaetano Matonti, 2015. "Do big 4 audit companies detect earnings management and report it in the audit opinion? Empirical evidence from italian non-listed firms," ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(2), pages 5-43.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10208-:d:890298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.