IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10078-d888276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatio-Temporal Variation of Habitat Quality for Bird Species in China Caused by Land Use Change during 1995–2015

Author

Listed:
  • Bingkui Qiu

    (Department of Tourism Management, Jinzhong University, Jinzhong 030619, China)

  • Jinjiang Yao

    (Science and Technology Innovation and Public Management Research Center of Shanghai, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

  • Siyu Han

    (College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Zhe Zhu

    (School of Management, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, China)

Abstract

The analysis of land use change (LUC) has become an important criterion for evaluating the impact of human activities on the natural environment. Habitat loss and degradation caused by LUC are the main threats to biodiversity worldwide. Research on the impact of long-term, wide-scope, and fine-scale LUC on bird habitats is currently limited due to a lack of adequate data. In this study, conducted in China, 9 km grid units were sampled randomly between 1995 and 2015. Logistic regression was used to calculate the probability that each unit grid contained suitable habitat (hereinafter, abbreviated as PGSH) for 981 bird species and analyze the spatial-temporal characteristics of PGSH accordingly. The results showed that: (1) The habitat quality of 84 bird species deteriorated, but for 582 bird species, habitat quality improved. (2) There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the intensity of LUC and the PGSH. The LUC intensity threshold is approximately 67.21%. (3) Based on the counterfactual scenario analysis, the construction of the Three North Shelterbelt has increased the PGSH for all bird species from 20.76% before restoration to 21.38% after restoration. Within the LUC grid representing the transformation of farmland back to forests, the average PGSH for all birds increased from 73.97% to 75.04%. These results may provide a reference for measuring the impacts of LUC on bird species, enabling the protection of bird species and habitats that need it most.

Suggested Citation

  • Bingkui Qiu & Jinjiang Yao & Siyu Han & Zhe Zhu, 2022. "Spatio-Temporal Variation of Habitat Quality for Bird Species in China Caused by Land Use Change during 1995–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-12, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10078-:d:888276
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10078/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10078/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shannon M. Sterling & Agnès Ducharne & Jan Polcher, 2013. "The impact of global land-cover change on the terrestrial water cycle," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(4), pages 385-390, April.
    2. Xindong Du & Xiaobin Jin & Xilian Yang & Xuhong Yang & Yinkang Zhou, 2014. "Spatial Pattern of Land Use Change and Its Driving Force in Jiangsu Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Ryan P. Powers & Walter Jetz, 2019. "Global habitat loss and extinction risk of terrestrial vertebrates under future land-use-change scenarios," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(4), pages 323-329, April.
    4. Keyue Yuan & Fei Li & Haijuan Yang & Yiming Wang, 2019. "The Influence of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value in Shangzhou District," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-13, April.
    5. Dinda, Soumyananda, 2004. "Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis: A Survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 431-455, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cheng He & Kangning Xiong & Yongkuan Chi & Shuzhen Song & Jinzhong Fang & Shuyu He, 2022. "Effects of Landscape Type Change on Spatial and Temporal Evolution of Ecological Assets in a Karst Plateau-Mountain Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Yajuan Wang & Yongheng Rao & Hongbo Zhu, 2023. "Analyzing the Land Use and Cover Change Inside and Outside China’s Ecological Function Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Davor Mance & Katarina Krunić & Diana Mance, 2021. "Protecting Species by Promoting Protected Areas and Human Development—A Panel Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Arsani Alina & Stefan George, 2024. "Energy Transition and European Sub-Models. Restructuring EU Economy," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 86-101.
    5. Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman & Zaman, Khalid & Zhang, Yu, 2016. "The relationship between energy-resource depletion, climate change, health resources and the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from the panel of selected developed countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 468-477.
    6. Fujii, Hidemichi & Managi, Shunsuke, 2013. "Which industry is greener? An empirical study of nine industries in OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 381-388.
    7. Muhammad Shahbaz & Vassilios G. Papavassiliou & Amine Lahiani & David Roubaud, 2023. "Are we moving towards decarbonisation of the global economy? Lessons from the distant past to the present," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 2620-2634, July.
    8. Zanin, Luca & Marra, Giampiero, 2012. "Assessing the functional relationship between CO2 emissions and economic development using an additive mixed model approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 1328-1337.
    9. Kaika, Dimitra & Zervas, Efthimios, 2013. "The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) theory. Part B: Critical issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1403-1411.
    10. Touitou Mohammed, 2021. "Empirical Analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions in North African Countries," Econometrics. Advances in Applied Data Analysis, Sciendo, vol. 25(2), pages 67-77, June.
    11. Erasmia Kotroni & Dimitra Kaika & Efthimios Zervas, 2020. "Environmental Kuznets Curve in Greece in the period 1960-2014," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 364-370.
    12. Emrah Kocak & Hayriye Hilal Baglitas, 2022. "The path to sustainable municipal solid waste management: Do human development, energy efficiency, and income inequality matter?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1947-1962, December.
    13. Yue, Shen & Munir, Irfan Ullah & Hyder, Shabir & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Qazi Abro, Muhammad Moinuddin & Zaman, Khalid, 2020. "Sustainable food production, forest biodiversity and mineral pricing: Interconnected global issues," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    14. Awaworyi Churchill, Sefa & Inekwe, John & Smyth, Russell & Zhang, Xibin, 2019. "R&D intensity and carbon emissions in the G7: 1870–2014," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 30-37.
    15. Juan Antonio Duro & Jordi Teixidó-Figueras & Emilio Padilla, 2017. "The Causal Factors of International Inequality in $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 Emissions Per Capita: A Regression-Based Inequality Decomposition Analysis," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(4), pages 683-700, August.
    16. Ertürk, Mevlüde, 2016. "Çevre Kirliliği Ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Veri Görselleştirme Kullanarak Karşılaştırılması [The Relation Between Environmental Pollution and Economic Growth ," MPRA Paper 69879, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Mar 2016.
    17. Yan, Bingqian & Xia, Yan & Jiang, Xuemei, 2023. "Carbon productivity and value-added generations: Regional heterogeneity along global value chain," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 111-125.
    18. Hernan Winkler & Vincenzo Di Maro & Kelly Montoya & Sergio Olivieri & Emmanuel Vazquez, 2024. "Measuring Green Jobs: A New Database for Latin America and Other Regions," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0335, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    19. Apergis, Nicholas & Payne, James E., 2010. "Coal consumption and economic growth: Evidence from a panel of OECD countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1353-1359, March.
    20. Ehigiamusoe, Kizito Uyi & Lean, Hooi Hooi & Smyth, Russell, 2020. "The moderating role of energy consumption in the carbon emissions-income nexus in middle-income countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10078-:d:888276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.