IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10050-d887697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Advanced Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework of Bridge Maintenance Policy Formulation

Author

Listed:
  • Qi-Neng Zhou

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Ye Yuan

    (Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China)

  • Dong Yang

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

  • Jing Zhang

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China)

Abstract

In its long service life, bridge structure will inevitably deteriorate due to coupling effects; thus, bridge maintenance has become a research hotspot. The existing algorithms are mostly based on linear programming and dynamic programming, which have low efficiency and high economic cost and cannot meet the actual needs of maintenance. In this paper, a multi-agent reinforcement learning framework was proposed to predict the deterioration process reasonably and achieve the optimal maintenance policy. Using the regression-based optimization method, the Markov transition matrix can better describe the uncertain transition process of bridge components in the maintenance year and the real-time updating of the matrix can be realized by monitoring and evaluating the performance deterioration of components. Aiming at bridges with a large number of components, the maintenance decision-making framework of multi-agent reinforcement learning can adjust the maintenance policy according to the updated Markov matrix in time, which can better adapt to the dynamic change of bridge performance in service life. Finally, the effectiveness of the framework was verified by taking the simulation data of a simply supported beam bridge and a cable-stayed bridge as examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi-Neng Zhou & Ye Yuan & Dong Yang & Jing Zhang, 2022. "An Advanced Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Framework of Bridge Maintenance Policy Formulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10050-:d:887697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10050/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10050/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalliopi Kastampolidou & Christos Papalitsas & Theodore Andronikos, 2022. "The Distributed Kolkata Paise Restaurant Game," Games, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Robelin, Charles-Antoine & Madanat, S M, 2006. "Dynamic Programing based Maintenance and Replacement Optimization for Bridge Decks using History-Dependent Deterioration Models," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5k01s7x9, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Volodymyr Mnih & Koray Kavukcuoglu & David Silver & Andrei A. Rusu & Joel Veness & Marc G. Bellemare & Alex Graves & Martin Riedmiller & Andreas K. Fidjeland & Georg Ostrovski & Stig Petersen & Charle, 2015. "Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning," Nature, Nature, vol. 518(7540), pages 529-533, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tulika Saha & Sriparna Saha & Pushpak Bhattacharyya, 2020. "Towards sentiment aided dialogue policy learning for multi-intent conversations using hierarchical reinforcement learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, July.
    2. Mahmoud Mahfouz & Angelos Filos & Cyrine Chtourou & Joshua Lockhart & Samuel Assefa & Manuela Veloso & Danilo Mandic & Tucker Balch, 2019. "On the Importance of Opponent Modeling in Auction Markets," Papers 1911.12816, arXiv.org.
    3. Imen Azzouz & Wiem Fekih Hassen, 2023. "Optimization of Electric Vehicles Charging Scheduling Based on Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Decentralized Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Jacob W. Crandall & Mayada Oudah & Tennom & Fatimah Ishowo-Oloko & Sherief Abdallah & Jean-François Bonnefon & Manuel Cebrian & Azim Shariff & Michael A. Goodrich & Iyad Rahwan, 2018. "Cooperating with machines," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
      • Abdallah, Sherief & Bonnefon, Jean-François & Cebrian, Manuel & Crandall, Jacob W. & Ishowo-Oloko, Fatimah & Oudah, Mayada & Rahwan, Iyad & Shariff, Azim & Tennom,, 2017. "Cooperating with Machines," TSE Working Papers 17-806, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
      • Abdallah, Sherief & Bonnefon, Jean-François & Cebrian, Manuel & Crandall, Jacob W. & Ishowo-Oloko, Fatimah & Oudah, Mayada & Rahwan, Iyad & Shariff, Azim & Tennom,, 2017. "Cooperating with Machines," IAST Working Papers 17-68, Institute for Advanced Study in Toulouse (IAST).
      • Jacob Crandall & Mayada Oudah & Fatimah Ishowo-Oloko Tennom & Fatimah Ishowo-Oloko & Sherief Abdallah & Jean-François Bonnefon & Manuel Cebrian & Azim Shariff & Michael Goodrich & Iyad Rahwan, 2018. "Cooperating with machines," Post-Print hal-01897802, HAL.
    5. Sun, Alexander Y., 2020. "Optimal carbon storage reservoir management through deep reinforcement learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    6. Yassine Chemingui & Adel Gastli & Omar Ellabban, 2020. "Reinforcement Learning-Based School Energy Management System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, December.
    7. Woo Jae Byun & Bumkyu Choi & Seongmin Kim & Joohyun Jo, 2023. "Practical Application of Deep Reinforcement Learning to Optimal Trade Execution," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Lu, Yu & Xiang, Yue & Huang, Yuan & Yu, Bin & Weng, Liguo & Liu, Junyong, 2023. "Deep reinforcement learning based optimal scheduling of active distribution system considering distributed generation, energy storage and flexible load," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    9. Yuhong Wang & Lei Chen & Hong Zhou & Xu Zhou & Zongsheng Zheng & Qi Zeng & Li Jiang & Liang Lu, 2021. "Flexible Transmission Network Expansion Planning Based on DQN Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-21, April.
    10. Huang, Ruchen & He, Hongwen & Gao, Miaojue, 2023. "Training-efficient and cost-optimal energy management for fuel cell hybrid electric bus based on a novel distributed deep reinforcement learning framework," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    11. Michelle M. LaMar, 2018. "Markov Decision Process Measurement Model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 83(1), pages 67-88, March.
    12. Zichen Lu & Ying Yan, 2024. "Temperature Control of Fuel Cell Based on PEI-DDPG," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-19, April.
    13. Yang, Ting & Zhao, Liyuan & Li, Wei & Zomaya, Albert Y., 2021. "Dynamic energy dispatch strategy for integrated energy system based on improved deep reinforcement learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    14. Wang, Xuan & Shu, Gequn & Tian, Hua & Wang, Rui & Cai, Jinwen, 2020. "Operation performance comparison of CCHP systems with cascade waste heat recovery systems by simulation and operation optimisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    15. Wang, Yi & Qiu, Dawei & Sun, Mingyang & Strbac, Goran & Gao, Zhiwei, 2023. "Secure energy management of multi-energy microgrid: A physical-informed safe reinforcement learning approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    16. Parvez Farazi, Nahid & Zou, Bo & Tulabandhula, Theja, 2022. "Dynamic On-Demand Crowdshipping Using Constrained and Heuristics-Embedded Double Dueling Deep Q-Network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    17. Louback, Eduardo & Biswas, Atriya & Machado, Fabricio & Emadi, Ali, 2024. "A review of the design process of energy management systems for dual-motor battery electric vehicles," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    18. Brammer, Janis & Lutz, Bernhard & Neumann, Dirk, 2022. "Permutation flow shop scheduling with multiple lines and demand plans using reinforcement learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 75-86.
    19. Neha Soni & Enakshi Khular Sharma & Narotam Singh & Amita Kapoor, 2019. "Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Businesses: from Research, Innovation, Market Deployment to Future Shifts in Business Models," Papers 1905.02092, arXiv.org.
    20. Tri-Hai Nguyen & Laihyuk Park, 2023. "HAP-Assisted RSMA-Enabled Vehicular Edge Computing: A DRL-Based Optimization Framework," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10050-:d:887697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.