Author
Listed:
- Priyanka Chandra
(ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)
- Subhash Chander Gill
(ICAR—Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal 132001, India)
- Kailash Prajapat
(ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)
- Arijit Barman
(ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)
- Rajender Singh Chhokar
(ICAR—Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal 132001, India)
- Subhash Chandra Tripathi
(ICAR—Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal 132001, India)
- Geeta Singh
(ICAR—Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012, India)
- Raj Kumar
(ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)
- Arvind Kumar Rai
(ICAR—Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal 132001, India)
- Rinki Khobra
(ICAR—Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal 132001, India)
- Poonam Jasrotia
(ICAR—Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal 132001, India)
- Gyanendra P. Singh
(ICAR—Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal 132001, India)
Abstract
The deterioration of soil biological health is the most important aspect associated with the sustainability of cereal-based food production systems. The application of organic nutrient sources is widely accepted and recommended for sustaining crop productivity and preserving soil fertility. Therefore, a study was carried out to assess the effects of different levels of farmyard manure (FYM 10 : 10 t ha −1 , FYM 20 : 20 t ha −1 , FYM 30 : 30 t ha −1 ), including inorganic fertilizer (NPK) on the soil and the biological properties of five high-yielding wheat cultivars (HD 2967, DPW 621-50, PBW 550, and WH 1105) over a three-year period (2014–2015 to 2016–2017). The results showed that the application of NPK produced significantly higher yields compared to different levels of FYM and the control during all the study years. The continuous addition of a higher rate of FYM at 30 t ha −1 was found to be beneficial in terms of enhancing crop yield gain, thereby bridging the yield gap to only 7.2% in the third year; the gap was 69.1% in the first year with NPK application. The microbial population and microbial biomass carbon were significantly higher in the FYM treatments compared to the NPK treatment. The activities of different soil enzymes were observed to be significantly maximum in the FYM 30 treatment. Similarly, the addition of FYM significantly improved the soil respiration and microbial activity over the NPK and control treatments. Based on the principal component analysis, fluorescein diacetate, bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes were observed as sensitive biological parameters for the assessing of soil biological health. The soil biological index (SBI) determined with the sensitive parameters was in the decreasing order of FYM 30 (0.70), FYM 20 (0.61), FYM 10 (0.55), NPK (0.18), and control (0.15). Considering both the SBI and the sustainability yield index together, the performance of WH 1105 was found to be better compared to the rest of the wheat cultivars. Our results conclude that the application of FYM in the long run increases the crop yield (24.3 to 38.9%) and improves the soil biological process, leading to the improved biological index of the soil.
Suggested Citation
Priyanka Chandra & Subhash Chander Gill & Kailash Prajapat & Arijit Barman & Rajender Singh Chhokar & Subhash Chandra Tripathi & Geeta Singh & Raj Kumar & Arvind Kumar Rai & Rinki Khobra & Poonam Jasr, 2022.
"Response of Wheat Cultivars to Organic and Inorganic Nutrition: Effect on the Yield and Soil Biological Properties,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9578-:d:880233
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9578-:d:880233. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.