IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8837-d866379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relevance of Impact Categories and Applicability of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods from an Automotive Industry Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Natalia Mikosch

    (Department of Sustainable Engineering, Institute of Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany)

  • Tina Dettmer

    (Group Research & Development, Life Cycle Optimisation, Volkswagen AG, Berliner Ring 2, 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany)

  • Benjamin Plaga

    (Group Research & Development, Life Cycle Optimisation, Volkswagen AG, Berliner Ring 2, 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany)

  • Marko Gernuks

    (Group Components, Circular Economy, Volkswagen AG, Berliner Ring 2, 38440 Wolfsburg, Germany)

  • Matthias Finkbeiner

    (Department of Sustainable Engineering, Institute of Environmental Technology, Technische Universität Berlin, Straße des 17. Juni 135, 10623 Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

Climate change impacts have been extensively addressed in academia, politics and industry for decades. However, particularly within the scientific community, the importance of considering further impact categories to ensure holistic environmental assessment and avoid burden shifting is strongly emphasized. Since considering all impact categories might become overwhelming for industry, a prioritization approach can support practitioners to focus their efforts on the most relevant impacts. Therefore, within this paper, an approach for the identification of relevant impact categories is developed for the automotive sector together with Volkswagen AG. The evaluation is conducted using a criteria set including criteria groups “relevance for automotive sector” and “relevance for stakeholders”. For the impact categories identified as relevant, an evaluation of LCIA methods is conducted considering the methodologies CML and ReCiPe 2016 and the methods recommended by PEF. The results demonstrate that climate change is by far the most relevant impact category followed by resource use, human toxicity and ecotoxicity from both automotive and stakeholder perspective. Based on the evaluation of the LCIA methods, a combination of different methods can be recommended. This work provides guidance for the automotive sector to prioritize its focus on the most relevant impact categories and to select applicable LCIA methods for their quantification.

Suggested Citation

  • Natalia Mikosch & Tina Dettmer & Benjamin Plaga & Marko Gernuks & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2022. "Relevance of Impact Categories and Applicability of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods from an Automotive Industry Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8837-:d:866379
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8837/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8837/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergej Lisowski & Markus Berger & Justus Caspers & Klaus Mayr-Rauch & Georg Bäuml & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2020. "Criteria-Based Approach to Select Relevant Environmental SDG Indicators for the Automobile Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Achtelik, Timo & Tiwari, Rajnish, 2022. "Ecological lightweight design for sustainable composites: Need for application of frugal engineering principles," Working Papers 114, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Clemens Pizzinini & Emanuel D’Amico & Korbinian Götz & Markus Lienkamp, 2023. "Driving Sustainable Development: The Power of Vehicle-Based Services in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Francisco J. Tapiador & Andrés Navarro & Josu Mezo & Sergio de la Llave & Jesús Muñoz, 2021. "Urban Vegetation Leveraging Actions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    3. Dimitrios Bouras & Styliani (Stella) Sofianopoulou, 2023. "Sustainable Development Assessment of Organizations through Quantitative Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, May.
    4. María Garrido-Ruso & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán & Albertina Paula Monteiro, 2022. "Businesses’ Role in the Fulfillment of the 2030 Agenda: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-35, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8837-:d:866379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.