IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i14p8701-d863913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Level and Consumption Behavior of Native Plants, Meats, and Drinking Waters with High Fluoride Concentrations about the Relation to the Potential Health Risk of Fluoride in Lamphun Province Thailand: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Wittaya Tewarangsri

    (Informatics Innovation Center of Excellence, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand)

  • Tippawan Chaiwong

    (Emergency Room Department, Dok Kham Tai Hospital, Phayao 56120, Thailand)

  • Kongkea Phan

    (Faculty of Science and Technology, International University, Phnom Penh 12101, Cambodia)

  • Chaipat Lapinee

    (Department of Chemistry, School of Science, University of Phayao, Phayao 56000, Thailand)

  • Sanhawat Chaiwong

    (School of Public Health, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 8016, Thailand)

Abstract

Fluoride exposure from natural, agricultural, and industrial sources has harmed people living in fluoride-affected areas. Fluoride accumulates in the human body after being exposed to it through the food chain. The population consisted of 371 community health volunteers who were surveyed and chosen based on personal fluoride information. Only 39 residents were chosen to be interviewed and take part in the trial, which involved drinking fluoride-containing groundwater (>1.5 part per million: ppm) and urine testing that revealed urine fluoride level (>0.7 ppm). In addition, 47 biological samples and eight commercially bottled water specimens were examined. The information was gathered in four ways: (1) a questionnaire-based survey of fluoride knowledge, (2) food consumption behavior with locally grown vegetables, fruits, poultry, and meat, and commercially bottled water produced by groundwater in fluoride-affected areas, (3) a semi-food frequency questionnaire, and (4) fluoride content measurements using an ion-selective electrode. According to the analyses, the participants ranged in age from 51 to 60 years, with approximately 60.38% of them female and born and raised in polluted areas. The majority of subjects had a low level of fluoride knowledge (65.23%). The respondents’ primary source of drinking water (100.00%) was commercially bottled water; they chewed camellia sinensis 11.56% of the time (1 to 5 years) and they drank tea 9.16% of the time (during 1 to 5 years). Sus scrofa domesticus was responsible for the intake of vegetables and fruits, whereas Brassica chinensis, Jusl var para-chinensis (Bailey), and Tsen and Lee were responsible for the intake of poultry and animal flesh. They were all purchased at a local farm. The hazard quotient was greater than one, and the fluoride concentration (ppm) ranged between 75.00% (0.29–5.20), 57.14% (0.01–0.46), 88.89% (0.07–0.91), 100.00% (0.43–3.07), 100.00% (0.58–0.77), 42.86% (0.12–0.62 ppm.), 60.00% (0.11–1.44), and 33.33% (0.10–0.80) in drinking water, fruit, young and mature plants. Fluoride ingestion may pose a health concern. Under the 95th percentile condition, 74.47% consumed water with a high fluoride level, vegetables and fruits, and poultry and meats.

Suggested Citation

  • Wittaya Tewarangsri & Tippawan Chaiwong & Kongkea Phan & Chaipat Lapinee & Sanhawat Chaiwong, 2022. "Knowledge Level and Consumption Behavior of Native Plants, Meats, and Drinking Waters with High Fluoride Concentrations about the Relation to the Potential Health Risk of Fluoride in Lamphun Province ," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-24, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8701-:d:863913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8701/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/14/8701/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solomon Negash & Philip Musa & Doug Vogel & Sundeep Sahay, 2018. "Healthcare information technology for development: improvements in people’s lives through innovations in the uses of technologies," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 189-197, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Edward Simpson & David Bradley & John Palfreyman & Roger White, 2022. "Sustainable Society: Wellbeing and Technology—3 Case Studies in Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-30, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:14:p:8701-:d:863913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.