Author
Listed:
- Mingyue Wan
(Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510530, China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China
Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Operational Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Zhiqin Wang
(Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510530, China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China
Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Operational Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Guangming Mai
(Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510530, China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China
Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Operational Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Zengling Ma
(National and Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Ecological Treatment Technology for Urban Water Pollution, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China)
- Xiaomin Xia
(Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510530, China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Yehui Tan
(Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510530, China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
- Gang Li
(Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-Resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510530, China
Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou 511458, China
Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Operational Oceanography, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
Abstract
The changes in underwater light in field usually occur not only in intensity but in spectrum, affecting the photophysiology of marine photoautotrophs. In this study, we comparably examined the photosynthesis of two dominating macroalgae in the Daya Bay, Chlorophyta Ulva fasciata and Phaeophyta Sargassum thunbergii , under white light, as well as under red, green and blue light. The results showed that the net photosynthetic O 2 evolution rate (Pn) of U. fasciata under field light increased from 25.2 ± 3.06 to 168 ± 1.2 µmol O 2 g FW −1 h −1 from dawn to noon, then decreased to 42.4 ± 0.20 µmol O 2 g FW −1 h −1 at dusk. The Pn of S. thunbergii exhibited a similar diel change pattern, but was over 50% lower than that of U. fasciata . The maximal photosynthetic rate (Pmax) of U. fasciata derived from the photosynthesis vs. irradiance curve under white light (i.e., 148 ± 15.8 µmol O 2 g FW −1 h −1 ) was ~30% higher than that under blue light, while the Pmax of S. thunbergii under white light (i.e., 39.2 ± 3.44 µmol O 2 g FW −1 h −1 ) was over 50% lower than that under red, green and blue light. Furthermore, the daily primary production (PP) of U. fasciata was ~20% higher under white than blue light, while that of S. thunbergii was 34% lower, indicating the varied light spectral compositions influence algal photosynthetic ability and thus their primary production in field, and such an influence is species-specific.
Suggested Citation
Mingyue Wan & Zhiqin Wang & Guangming Mai & Zengling Ma & Xiaomin Xia & Yehui Tan & Gang Li, 2022.
"Photosynthetic Characteristics of Macroalgae Ulva fasciata and Sargassum thunbergii in the Daya Bay of the South China Sea, with Special Reference to the Effects of Light Quality,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-11, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8063-:d:853951
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Zhang, Haibo & Richardson, Patricia A. & Belayneh, Bruk E. & Ristvey, Andrew & Lea-Cox, John & Copes, Warren E. & Moorman, Gary W. & Hong, Chuanxue, 2015.
"Characterization of water quality in stratified nursery recycling irrigation reservoirs,"
Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 76-83.
- Chuanjun Dai & Hengguo Yu & Qing Guo & He Liu & Qi Wang & Zengling Ma & Min Zhao, 2019.
"Dynamics Induced by Delay in a Nutrient-Phytoplankton Model with Multiple Delays,"
Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-16, February.
- Joydev Chattopadhyay & Ezio Venturino & Samrat Chatterjee, 2013.
"Aggregation of toxin-producing phytoplankton acts as a defence mechanism – a model-based study,"
Mathematical and Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 159-174, April.
- Olusoji, Oluwafemi D. & Spaak, Jurg W. & Holmes, Mark & Neyens, Thomas & Aerts, Marc & De Laender, Frederik, 2021.
"cyanoFilter: An R package to identify phytoplankton populations from flow cytometry data using cell pigmentation and granularity,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 460(C).
- Tsakalakis, Ioannis & Pahlow, Markus & Oschlies, Andreas & Blasius, Bernd & Ryabov, Alexey B., 2018.
"Diel light cycle as a key factor for modelling phytoplankton biogeography and diversity,"
Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 241-248.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8063-:d:853951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.