IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i13p8038-d853400.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multicriteria Approach for Supplier Selection: Evidence from a Case Study in the Fashion Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Caristi

    (Department of Economics, University of Messina, Via dei Verdi 75, 98122 Messina, Italy)

  • Raffaele Boffardi

    (Department of Social and Human Science, University of Naples “L’Orientale”, Largo San Giovanni Maggiore 30, 80134 Naples, Italy)

  • Cristina Ciliberto

    (Department of Economics, University of Messina, Via dei Verdi 75, 98122 Messina, Italy)

  • Roberta Arbolino

    (Department of Social and Human Science, University of Naples “L’Orientale”, Largo San Giovanni Maggiore 30, 80134 Naples, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Ioppolo

    (Department of Economics, University of Messina, Via dei Verdi 75, 98122 Messina, Italy)

Abstract

Worldwide manufactures are redesigning supply chains, often outsourcing with the aim of maintaining a competitive advantage and gaining market share. When selecting and purchasing fabrics, firms should actively cooperate with suppliers, to meet customers’ needs. In this view, the supplier selection process plays a key role in keeping a competitive edge in global markets. Therefore, this study proposes a multicriteria decision-making model (MCDM) to ease supplier evaluation and selection. Supply chain operation reference metrics (SCOR metrics) and fuzzy technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS) are combined to build a model for supplier selection. The former allows us to conduct a very thorough fact-based analysis of all features in the supply chain, while the combination of fuzzy theory and SCOR model allows us to deal with uncertainty. The main novelty of this method is that it incorporates a consolidated supply chain management criteria within the framework of fuzzy set theory and multicriteria decision-making model (MCDM) facilitating their application into practice. The proposed approach is tested by considering the case of a manufacturing firm in the fashion industry willing to designate the most appropriate supplier within a set of three potential ones.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Caristi & Raffaele Boffardi & Cristina Ciliberto & Roberta Arbolino & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2022. "Multicriteria Approach for Supplier Selection: Evidence from a Case Study in the Fashion Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8038-:d:853400
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8038/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/13/8038/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jose Benitez & Yang Chen & Thompson S.H. Teo & Aseel Ajamieh, 2018. "Evolution of the impact of e-business technology on operational competence and firm profitability: A panel data investigation," Post-Print hal-01998202, HAL.
    2. Liao, Zhiying & Rittscher, Jens, 2007. "A multi-objective supplier selection model under stochastic demand conditions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(1), pages 150-159, January.
    3. Weber, Charles A. & Current, John R. & Benton, W. C., 1991. "Vendor selection criteria and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 2-18, January.
    4. Miguel Afonso Sellitto & Giancarlo Medeiros Pereira & Miriam Borchardt & Rosnaldo Inácio da Silva & Cláudia Viviane Viegas, 2015. "A SCOR-based model for supply chain performance measurement: application in the footwear industry," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(16), pages 4917-4926, August.
    5. Beamon, Benita M., 1998. "Supply chain design and analysis:: Models and methods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 281-294, August.
    6. Biljana Petković & Yousef Zandi & Alireza Sadighi Agdas & Ivica Nikolić & Nebojša Denić & Nenad Kojić & Abdellatif Selmi & Alibek Issakhov & Slaviša Milošević & Afrasyab Khan, 2022. "Adaptive neuro fuzzy evaluation of energy and non‐energy material productivity impact on sustainable development based on circular economy and gross domestic product," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 129-144, January.
    7. Handfield, Robert & Walton, Steven V. & Sroufe, Robert & Melnyk, Steven A., 2002. "Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 70-87, August.
    8. Subhani, Muhammad Imtiaz & Osman, Ms.Amber, 2010. "Factors affecting the decision making of out-sourcing in textile in Pakistan," MPRA Paper 27006, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 09 Nov 2010.
    9. Scott Stephens, 2001. "Supply Chain Operations Reference Model Version 5.0: A New Tool to Improve Supply Chain Efficiency and Achieve Best Practice," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 471-476, December.
    10. Soni, Gunjan & Kumar, Satish & Mahto, Raj V. & Mangla, Sachin K. & Mittal, M.L. & Lim, Weng Marc, 2022. "A decision-making framework for Industry 4.0 technology implementation: The case of FinTech and sustainable supply chain finance for SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    11. Eduarda Asfora Frej & Lucia Reis Peixoto Roselli & Jônatas Araújo de Almeida & Adiel Teixeira de Almeida, 2017. "A Multicriteria Decision Model for Supplier Selection in a Food Industry Based on FITradeoff Method," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-9, October.
    12. Jammernegg, Werner & Reiner, Gerald, 2007. "Performance improvement of supply chain processes by coordinated inventory and capacity management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 183-190, July.
    13. Lin, Rong-Ho, 2012. "An integrated model for supplier selection under a fuzzy situation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 55-61.
    14. Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2016. "Combining SCOR® model and fuzzy TOPSIS for supplier evaluation and management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 128-141.
    15. D’Amico, Gaspare & Arbolino, Roberta & Shi, Lei & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Ioppolo, Giuseppe, 2022. "Digitalisation driven urban metabolism circularity: A review and analysis of circular city initiatives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    16. Gumus, Alev Taskin & Guneri, Ali Fuat & Ulengin, Fusun, 2010. "A new methodology for multi-echelon inventory management in stochastic and neuro-fuzzy environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 248-260, November.
    17. G. Kannan & A. Noorul Haq & P. Sasikumar & Subramaniam Arunachalam, 2008. "Analysis and selection of green suppliers using interpretative structural modelling and analytic hierarchy process," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 163-182.
    18. Bai, Chunguang & Sarkis, Joseph, 2010. "Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 252-264, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiongyong Zhou & Zhiduan Xu, 2018. "An Integrated Sustainable Supplier Selection Approach Based on Hybrid Information Aggregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-49, July.
    2. Alptekin Ulutaş & Ayşe Topal & Dragan Pamučar & Željko Stević & Darjan Karabašević & Gabrijela Popović, 2022. "A New Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Sustainable Supplier Selection Based on a Novel Grey WISP and Grey BWM Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    4. Dobos, Imre & Vörösmarty, Gyöngyi, 2014. "Green supplier selection and evaluation using DEA-type composite indicators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 273-278.
    5. Lin, Rong-Ho, 2012. "An integrated model for supplier selection under a fuzzy situation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 55-61.
    6. Mohammed, Ahmed & Harris, Irina & Govindan, Kannan, 2019. "A hybrid MCDM-FMOO approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 171-184.
    7. Awasthi, Anjali & Chauhan, Satyaveer S. & Goyal, S.K., 2010. "A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 370-378, August.
    8. Theißen, Sebastian & Spinler, Stefan, 2014. "Strategic analysis of manufacturer-supplier partnerships: An ANP model for collaborative CO2 reduction management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 383-397.
    9. R. Sivaprakasam & V. Selladurai & P. Sasikumar, 2015. "Implementation of interpretive structural modelling methodology as a strategic decision making tool in a Green Supply Chain Context," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 233(1), pages 423-448, October.
    10. James J.H. Liou & Jolanta Tamošaitienė & Edmundas K. Zavadskas & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2016. "New hybrid COPRAS-G MADM Model for improving and selecting suppliers in green supply chain management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(1), pages 114-134, January.
    11. Hashemi, Seyed Hamid & Karimi, Amir & Tavana, Madjid, 2015. "An integrated green supplier selection approach with analytic network process and improved Grey relational analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 178-191.
    12. Roya Ghamari & Mohammad Mahdavi-Mazdeh & Seyed Farid Ghannadpour, 2022. "Resilient and sustainable supplier selection via a new framework: a case study from the steel industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(8), pages 10403-10441, August.
    13. Xu, Jiuping & Ding, Can, 2011. "A class of chance constrained multiobjective linear programming with birandom coefficients and its application to vendors selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 709-720, June.
    14. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    15. Ali Salmasnia & Hamid Daliri & Ali Ghorbanian & Hadi Mokhtari, 2018. "A statistical analysis and simulation based approach to an uncertain supplier selection problem with discount option," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(6), pages 1250-1259, December.
    16. Andrea Chiarini, 2017. "Environmental Policies for Evaluating Suppliers' Performance Based on GRI Indicators," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 98-111, January.
    17. Agnieszka Konys, 2019. "Green Supplier Selection Criteria: From a Literature Review to a Comprehensive Knowledge Base," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-41, August.
    18. Ehsan Afshar Bakeshlou & Alireza Arshadi Khamseh & Mohammad Ali Goudarzian Asl & Javad Sadeghi & Mostafa Abbaszadeh, 2017. "Evaluating a green supplier selection problem using a hybrid MODM algorithm," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 913-927, April.
    19. van der Rhee, Bo & Verma, Rohit & Plaschka, Gerhard, 2009. "Understanding trade-offs in the supplier selection process: The role of flexibility, delivery, and value-added services/support," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 30-41, July.
    20. Sureeyatanapas, Panitas & Sriwattananusart, Kawinpob & Niyamosoth, Thanawath & Sessomboon, Weerapat & Arunyanart, Sirawadee, 2018. "Supplier selection towards uncertain and unavailable information: An extension of TOPSIS method," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 69-79.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:8038-:d:853400. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.